Lin Shuang Mao, Yi Xuan Wang, Zhi Ming Wu, Feng Hua Ding, Lin Lu, Wei Feng Shen, Yang Dai, Ying Shen
{"title":"升高的全身免疫炎症指数预测慢性全闭塞的2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉侧支不良。","authors":"Lin Shuang Mao, Yi Xuan Wang, Zhi Ming Wu, Feng Hua Ding, Lin Lu, Wei Feng Shen, Yang Dai, Ying Shen","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1490498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the value of different systemic immune-inflammatory markers for evaluating coronary collateralization (CC) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic total occlusion (CTO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) were calculated at admission in 1409 T2DM patients with CTO. The degree of coronary collaterals was estimated using the Rentrop scoring system and categorized into poor (Rentrop score 0 or 1) or good (Rentrop score 2 or 3) CC. The predictors of poor CC were determined by multivariate regression analysis, and the diagnostic potential of these indexes was analyzed by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SII, SIRI and PIV levels increased stepwise across Rentrop score 0-3, with significantly higher levels in patients with poor CC than in those with good CC (<i>P</i> < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, SII, SIRI and PIV (per tertile) remained independent factors for poor CC. SII predicted poor CC better than SIRI and PIV (AUC: 0.758 vs. 0.680 and 0.698, all <i>P</i> < 0.001). There existed an interaction between blood concentration of HbA1c and SII (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with high SII levels being associated with a greater risk (OR: 5.058 vs. 2.444) and providing a better predictive ability for poor CC (AUC: 0.817 vs. 0.731) in patients with HbA1c < 6.5% compared to those with HbA1c ≥ 6.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that elevated SII provides a better prediction for poor CC in T2DM patients with CTO especially at good glycemic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1490498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elevated systemic immune-inflammatory index predicts poor coronary collateralization in type 2 diabetic patients with chronic total occlusion.\",\"authors\":\"Lin Shuang Mao, Yi Xuan Wang, Zhi Ming Wu, Feng Hua Ding, Lin Lu, Wei Feng Shen, Yang Dai, Ying Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1490498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the value of different systemic immune-inflammatory markers for evaluating coronary collateralization (CC) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic total occlusion (CTO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) were calculated at admission in 1409 T2DM patients with CTO. The degree of coronary collaterals was estimated using the Rentrop scoring system and categorized into poor (Rentrop score 0 or 1) or good (Rentrop score 2 or 3) CC. The predictors of poor CC were determined by multivariate regression analysis, and the diagnostic potential of these indexes was analyzed by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SII, SIRI and PIV levels increased stepwise across Rentrop score 0-3, with significantly higher levels in patients with poor CC than in those with good CC (<i>P</i> < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, SII, SIRI and PIV (per tertile) remained independent factors for poor CC. SII predicted poor CC better than SIRI and PIV (AUC: 0.758 vs. 0.680 and 0.698, all <i>P</i> < 0.001). There existed an interaction between blood concentration of HbA1c and SII (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with high SII levels being associated with a greater risk (OR: 5.058 vs. 2.444) and providing a better predictive ability for poor CC (AUC: 0.817 vs. 0.731) in patients with HbA1c < 6.5% compared to those with HbA1c ≥ 6.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that elevated SII provides a better prediction for poor CC in T2DM patients with CTO especially at good glycemic control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1490498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672344/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1490498\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1490498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较2型糖尿病(T2DM)和慢性全闭塞(CTO)患者不同全身免疫炎症标志物对冠状动脉侧支(CC)的评价价值。方法:计算1409例T2DM合并CTO患者入院时的全身免疫炎症指数(SII)、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)和泛免疫炎症值(PIV)。采用Rentrop评分系统评估冠状动脉侧支病变程度,并将其分为不良(Rentrop评分0分或1分)和良好(Rentrop评分2分或3分)CC,通过多因素回归分析确定不良CC的预测因素,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析这些指标的诊断潜力。结果:SII、SIRI和PIV水平在Rentrop评分0-3分期间逐步升高,CC差患者的SII水平明显高于CC好患者(P P P P)。结论:我们的研究表明,SII升高可以更好地预测T2DM合并CTO的CC差患者,尤其是血糖控制良好的患者。
Elevated systemic immune-inflammatory index predicts poor coronary collateralization in type 2 diabetic patients with chronic total occlusion.
Objective: This study compared the value of different systemic immune-inflammatory markers for evaluating coronary collateralization (CC) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic total occlusion (CTO).
Methods: Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) were calculated at admission in 1409 T2DM patients with CTO. The degree of coronary collaterals was estimated using the Rentrop scoring system and categorized into poor (Rentrop score 0 or 1) or good (Rentrop score 2 or 3) CC. The predictors of poor CC were determined by multivariate regression analysis, and the diagnostic potential of these indexes was analyzed by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results: SII, SIRI and PIV levels increased stepwise across Rentrop score 0-3, with significantly higher levels in patients with poor CC than in those with good CC (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, SII, SIRI and PIV (per tertile) remained independent factors for poor CC. SII predicted poor CC better than SIRI and PIV (AUC: 0.758 vs. 0.680 and 0.698, all P < 0.001). There existed an interaction between blood concentration of HbA1c and SII (P < 0.001), with high SII levels being associated with a greater risk (OR: 5.058 vs. 2.444) and providing a better predictive ability for poor CC (AUC: 0.817 vs. 0.731) in patients with HbA1c < 6.5% compared to those with HbA1c ≥ 6.5%.
Conclusion: Our study shows that elevated SII provides a better prediction for poor CC in T2DM patients with CTO especially at good glycemic control.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers?
At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.