混合虚拟指导和远程监控在COPD管理:CAir随机对照研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/COPD.S487105
Dario Kohlbrenner, Manuel Kuhn, Adrian Kläy, Noriane A Sievi, Michal Muszynski, Adam Ivankay, Christoph S Gross, Alina Asisof, Thomas Brunschwiler, Christian F Clarenbach
{"title":"混合虚拟指导和远程监控在COPD管理:CAir随机对照研究。","authors":"Dario Kohlbrenner, Manuel Kuhn, Adrian Kläy, Noriane A Sievi, Michal Muszynski, Adam Ivankay, Christoph S Gross, Alina Asisof, Thomas Brunschwiler, Christian F Clarenbach","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S487105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of 12-weeks hybrid virtual coaching on health-related quality-of-life (HrQoL) in patients with stable COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We equipped all patients with a CAir Desk for telemonitoring, the intervention group additionally received hybrid virtual coaching through the built-in smartphone. The multimodal intervention based on the Living well with COPD programme, containing educational content, physical activity coaching, and home-based exercises. Primary outcome was HrQoL as measured by the SGRQ. Secondary outcomes were symptom burden, physical activity, functional exercise capacity, and lung function. Between-group differences were calculated using linear regression models, controlling for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 30 participants with COPD (13/17 women/men; 63 [9] years; FEV<sub>1</sub> 54 [22] % predicted), 24 (80%) completed the study. SGRQ improved in both groups (intervention: -4.5 [20.1]; control: -2.7 [7.4] points) without statistically significant or clinically relevant between-group differences (B = -2.5 points, 95% CI = -24.3, 19.3, p = 0.81). Physical activity increased only in the intervention group (313 [1561] vs -364 [2399] steps) without statistically significant but clinically relevant between-group difference (B = 2147 steps, 95% CI = -86, 4395, p = 0.06). Symptom burden decreased in both groups (-4.2 [6.7] vs -1.0 [2.8] points) without statistically significant but clinically relevant between-group difference (B = -3.0 points, 95% CI = -10.8, 5.0, p = 0.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Twelve-weeks hybrid virtual coaching did not improve HrQoL more than telemonitoring only in patients with stable COPD. The intervention group improved their physical activity and symptom burden clinically relevant more than the control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"19 ","pages":"2739-2750"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid Virtual Coaching and Telemonitoring in COPD Management: The CAir Randomised Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Dario Kohlbrenner, Manuel Kuhn, Adrian Kläy, Noriane A Sievi, Michal Muszynski, Adam Ivankay, Christoph S Gross, Alina Asisof, Thomas Brunschwiler, Christian F Clarenbach\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S487105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of 12-weeks hybrid virtual coaching on health-related quality-of-life (HrQoL) in patients with stable COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We equipped all patients with a CAir Desk for telemonitoring, the intervention group additionally received hybrid virtual coaching through the built-in smartphone. The multimodal intervention based on the Living well with COPD programme, containing educational content, physical activity coaching, and home-based exercises. Primary outcome was HrQoL as measured by the SGRQ. Secondary outcomes were symptom burden, physical activity, functional exercise capacity, and lung function. Between-group differences were calculated using linear regression models, controlling for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 30 participants with COPD (13/17 women/men; 63 [9] years; FEV<sub>1</sub> 54 [22] % predicted), 24 (80%) completed the study. SGRQ improved in both groups (intervention: -4.5 [20.1]; control: -2.7 [7.4] points) without statistically significant or clinically relevant between-group differences (B = -2.5 points, 95% CI = -24.3, 19.3, p = 0.81). Physical activity increased only in the intervention group (313 [1561] vs -364 [2399] steps) without statistically significant but clinically relevant between-group difference (B = 2147 steps, 95% CI = -86, 4395, p = 0.06). Symptom burden decreased in both groups (-4.2 [6.7] vs -1.0 [2.8] points) without statistically significant but clinically relevant between-group difference (B = -3.0 points, 95% CI = -10.8, 5.0, p = 0.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Twelve-weeks hybrid virtual coaching did not improve HrQoL more than telemonitoring only in patients with stable COPD. The intervention group improved their physical activity and symptom burden clinically relevant more than the control group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"2739-2750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681904/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S487105\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S487105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨12周混合虚拟训练对稳定期COPD患者健康相关生活质量(HrQoL)的影响。方法:所有患者均配备CAir台进行远程监护,干预组在此基础上通过内置智能手机进行混合虚拟训练。多模式干预基于“与COPD生活良好”计划,包括教育内容、体育活动指导和家庭锻炼。主要终点为HrQoL,由SGRQ衡量。次要结局是症状负担、体力活动、功能性运动能力和肺功能。采用线性回归模型计算组间差异,控制基线差异。结果:我们纳入了30名COPD患者(13/17名女性/男性;63亿年;FEV1 54[22] %预测),24(80%)完成研究。两组患者SGRQ均有改善(干预:-4.5 [20.1];对照组:-2.7[7.4]分),组间差异无统计学意义或临床相关性(B = -2.5分,95% CI = -24.3, 19.3, p = 0.81)。体力活动仅在干预组增加(313[1561]对-364[2399]步),组间差异无统计学意义(B = 2147步,95% CI = - 86,4395, p = 0.06)。两组症状负担下降(-4.2 [6.7]vs -1.0[2.8]分),组间差异无统计学意义,但具有临床相关性(B = -3.0分,95% CI = -10.8, 5.0, p = 0.43)。结论:在稳定型COPD患者中,12周的混合虚拟指导并不比远程监护更能改善HrQoL。干预组患者的体力活动和症状负担的改善程度明显高于对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hybrid Virtual Coaching and Telemonitoring in COPD Management: The CAir Randomised Controlled Study.

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of 12-weeks hybrid virtual coaching on health-related quality-of-life (HrQoL) in patients with stable COPD.

Methods: We equipped all patients with a CAir Desk for telemonitoring, the intervention group additionally received hybrid virtual coaching through the built-in smartphone. The multimodal intervention based on the Living well with COPD programme, containing educational content, physical activity coaching, and home-based exercises. Primary outcome was HrQoL as measured by the SGRQ. Secondary outcomes were symptom burden, physical activity, functional exercise capacity, and lung function. Between-group differences were calculated using linear regression models, controlling for baseline differences.

Results: We included 30 participants with COPD (13/17 women/men; 63 [9] years; FEV1 54 [22] % predicted), 24 (80%) completed the study. SGRQ improved in both groups (intervention: -4.5 [20.1]; control: -2.7 [7.4] points) without statistically significant or clinically relevant between-group differences (B = -2.5 points, 95% CI = -24.3, 19.3, p = 0.81). Physical activity increased only in the intervention group (313 [1561] vs -364 [2399] steps) without statistically significant but clinically relevant between-group difference (B = 2147 steps, 95% CI = -86, 4395, p = 0.06). Symptom burden decreased in both groups (-4.2 [6.7] vs -1.0 [2.8] points) without statistically significant but clinically relevant between-group difference (B = -3.0 points, 95% CI = -10.8, 5.0, p = 0.43).

Conclusion: Twelve-weeks hybrid virtual coaching did not improve HrQoL more than telemonitoring only in patients with stable COPD. The intervention group improved their physical activity and symptom burden clinically relevant more than the control group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
期刊最新文献
Hyperkalemia Is an Underestimated Risk Factor in COPD. The Causal Relationship Between Gut and Skin Microbiota and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease:A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis. The Impact of Beta-Blockers and Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors on the Prognosis of Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nation-Wide Registry Study. Application of Discrete Event Simulation Models for COPD Management: A Systematic Review. Predictive Value of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio/Serum Albumin for All-Cause Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Suffering from COPD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1