生物治疗对女性生育能力的影响:类风湿关节炎和银屑病关节炎女性的队列研究。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152608
Einat Haikin Herzberger, Tzipi Hornik-Lurie, Yair Levi, Netanella Miller, Amir Wiser, Anat Hershko-Klement
{"title":"生物治疗对女性生育能力的影响:类风湿关节炎和银屑病关节炎女性的队列研究。","authors":"Einat Haikin Herzberger, Tzipi Hornik-Lurie, Yair Levi, Netanella Miller, Amir Wiser, Anat Hershko-Klement","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate female fertility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exposed to biological drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, based on an electronic health record database, 4517 women with RA were compared to 1415 patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Patients were 18-40 years-of-age at diagnosis. Biological treatments included tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, anti-CD-20 monoclonal antibodies, interleukin blockers and T-cell inhibitors. Main outcome measure was positive pregnancy test rate. Secondary outcome measures were pregnancy attempts and use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis and at initiation of biological treatments was not statistically different between RA and PsA (30.7 ± 6.3 vs. 30.9 ± 6; p = 0.260 and 34.2 ± 8 vs. 34.2 ± 7.5 years; p = 0.729, respectively). Both groups demonstrated lower rates of positive beta hCG after diagnosis, as compared to baseline rates before diagnosis. However, exposure to biological treatment did not negatively affect the likelihood of conception in either group. Beta hCG testing increased in both groups after initiation of biological treatments (RA p < 0.01, PsA p = 0.07). Use of fertility medications before diagnosis was about 8 % in both groups (p > 0.5). After diagnosis, before exposure, this percentage dropped to approximately 4 % in both groups (p > 0.5) but recovered to baseline values. Post-exposure IVF rate among RA patients was lower (p < 0.01) than the pretreatment state but was not significantly different in the PsA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This large cohort study provides reassuring data regarding spontaneous and medicated fertility in patients exposed to biological medications. Further studies, as well as data on live birth rates are required to consolidate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"71 ","pages":"152608"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of biological treatment on female fertility: A cohort study of women with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Einat Haikin Herzberger, Tzipi Hornik-Lurie, Yair Levi, Netanella Miller, Amir Wiser, Anat Hershko-Klement\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate female fertility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exposed to biological drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, based on an electronic health record database, 4517 women with RA were compared to 1415 patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Patients were 18-40 years-of-age at diagnosis. Biological treatments included tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, anti-CD-20 monoclonal antibodies, interleukin blockers and T-cell inhibitors. Main outcome measure was positive pregnancy test rate. Secondary outcome measures were pregnancy attempts and use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis and at initiation of biological treatments was not statistically different between RA and PsA (30.7 ± 6.3 vs. 30.9 ± 6; p = 0.260 and 34.2 ± 8 vs. 34.2 ± 7.5 years; p = 0.729, respectively). Both groups demonstrated lower rates of positive beta hCG after diagnosis, as compared to baseline rates before diagnosis. However, exposure to biological treatment did not negatively affect the likelihood of conception in either group. Beta hCG testing increased in both groups after initiation of biological treatments (RA p < 0.01, PsA p = 0.07). Use of fertility medications before diagnosis was about 8 % in both groups (p > 0.5). After diagnosis, before exposure, this percentage dropped to approximately 4 % in both groups (p > 0.5) but recovered to baseline values. Post-exposure IVF rate among RA patients was lower (p < 0.01) than the pretreatment state but was not significantly different in the PsA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This large cohort study provides reassuring data regarding spontaneous and medicated fertility in patients exposed to biological medications. Further studies, as well as data on live birth rates are required to consolidate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"152608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152608\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152608","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨类风湿性关节炎(RA)暴露于生物药物的女性生育能力。方法:在这项基于电子健康记录数据库的回顾性队列研究中,4517名RA患者与1415名银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者进行了比较。患者诊断时年龄为18-40岁。生物治疗包括肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂、抗cd -20单克隆抗体、白细胞介素阻滞剂和t细胞抑制剂。主要结局指标为妊娠试验阳性率。次要结局指标是妊娠尝试和体外受精(IVF)的使用结果:RA和PsA在诊断和开始生物治疗时的平均年龄无统计学差异(30.7±6.3∶30.9±6;P = 0.260和34.2±8∶34.2±7.5岁;P = 0.729)。与诊断前的基线率相比,两组在诊断后均表现出较低的hCG阳性率。然而,暴露于生物治疗并没有负面影响受孕的可能性在两组。生物治疗开始后,两组患者β - hCG检测均升高(RA p < 0.01, PsA p = 0.07)。两组患者诊断前使用生育药物的比例均约为8% (p < 0.05)。诊断后,在暴露前,两组的这一百分比降至约4% (p < 0.05),但恢复到基线值。RA患者暴露后体外受精率低于治疗前(p < 0.01),而PsA组无显著差异。结论:这项大型队列研究提供了关于暴露于生物药物的患者自发和药物性生育的可靠数据。需要进一步的研究以及活产率的数据来巩固这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of biological treatment on female fertility: A cohort study of women with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

Objectives: To investigate female fertility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exposed to biological drugs.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, based on an electronic health record database, 4517 women with RA were compared to 1415 patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Patients were 18-40 years-of-age at diagnosis. Biological treatments included tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, anti-CD-20 monoclonal antibodies, interleukin blockers and T-cell inhibitors. Main outcome measure was positive pregnancy test rate. Secondary outcome measures were pregnancy attempts and use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis and at initiation of biological treatments was not statistically different between RA and PsA (30.7 ± 6.3 vs. 30.9 ± 6; p = 0.260 and 34.2 ± 8 vs. 34.2 ± 7.5 years; p = 0.729, respectively). Both groups demonstrated lower rates of positive beta hCG after diagnosis, as compared to baseline rates before diagnosis. However, exposure to biological treatment did not negatively affect the likelihood of conception in either group. Beta hCG testing increased in both groups after initiation of biological treatments (RA p < 0.01, PsA p = 0.07). Use of fertility medications before diagnosis was about 8 % in both groups (p > 0.5). After diagnosis, before exposure, this percentage dropped to approximately 4 % in both groups (p > 0.5) but recovered to baseline values. Post-exposure IVF rate among RA patients was lower (p < 0.01) than the pretreatment state but was not significantly different in the PsA group.

Conclusions: This large cohort study provides reassuring data regarding spontaneous and medicated fertility in patients exposed to biological medications. Further studies, as well as data on live birth rates are required to consolidate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Microbial pathways contributing to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: Advancing the identification and management. The cause is worse than the effect: Inequities in the United States health system; how could we change them? Metabolic checkpoints in rheumatoid arthritis. Promises and pitfalls of artificial intelligence models in forecasting rheumatoid arthritis treatment response and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1