腰椎关节突关节射频消融术:一项技术报告和观察研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/8871568
Andrea Künzle, Sander M J van Kuijk, Eva Koetsier
{"title":"腰椎关节突关节射频消融术:一项技术报告和观察研究。","authors":"Andrea Künzle, Sander M J van Kuijk, Eva Koetsier","doi":"10.1155/prm/8871568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Lumbar facet joints are the source of pain in 15%-41% of individuals experiencing low back pain (LBP). Conventional lumbar facet radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has Level II evidence for improving pain and function. The best proven technique, the parallel technique, is technically challenging, time-consuming, and often uncomfortable for the patient. A novel RFA technique using a 3-tined cannula offers a potentially less complex and shorter procedure. <b>Objectives:</b> To describe the novel lumbar facet joint RFA technique with the 3-tined cannula and to evaluate its efficacy in treating chronic lumbar facet joint pain. <b>Methods:</b> Eligible adult patients with chronic lumbar facet joint pain, confirmed by positive medial branch blocks (MBBs), refractory to conservative treatment, received the novel RFA treatment with the 3-tined cannula. The change in pain intensity at 2 months follow-up compared to baseline, percentage of patients reporting a ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% reduction of pain intensity, patient global impression of change (PGIC), need for pain medication, walking ability, sleep quality, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> A total of 44 patients were included. Patients experienced a clinically meaningful and significant pain relief at follow-up and 41% of the patients reported ≥ 50% reduction of pain. Forty-eight percent experienced at least a score of \"much improved\" on the PGIC. No severe side effects or complications were observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our observational study suggests that lumbar facet joint RFA using the novel technique achieves significant pain relief. The larger lesions decrease the likelihood of missing the target nerve while obviating the need to conduct numerous lesions. Limiting is the single-center set-up with a relatively short-term follow-up duration. Randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted to confirm the efficacy of the novel RFA technique to treat lumbar facet joint pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2024 ","pages":"8871568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbar Facet Joint Radiofrequency Ablation With a 3-Tined Cannula: A Technical Report and Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Künzle, Sander M J van Kuijk, Eva Koetsier\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/prm/8871568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Lumbar facet joints are the source of pain in 15%-41% of individuals experiencing low back pain (LBP). Conventional lumbar facet radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has Level II evidence for improving pain and function. The best proven technique, the parallel technique, is technically challenging, time-consuming, and often uncomfortable for the patient. A novel RFA technique using a 3-tined cannula offers a potentially less complex and shorter procedure. <b>Objectives:</b> To describe the novel lumbar facet joint RFA technique with the 3-tined cannula and to evaluate its efficacy in treating chronic lumbar facet joint pain. <b>Methods:</b> Eligible adult patients with chronic lumbar facet joint pain, confirmed by positive medial branch blocks (MBBs), refractory to conservative treatment, received the novel RFA treatment with the 3-tined cannula. The change in pain intensity at 2 months follow-up compared to baseline, percentage of patients reporting a ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% reduction of pain intensity, patient global impression of change (PGIC), need for pain medication, walking ability, sleep quality, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> A total of 44 patients were included. Patients experienced a clinically meaningful and significant pain relief at follow-up and 41% of the patients reported ≥ 50% reduction of pain. Forty-eight percent experienced at least a score of \\\"much improved\\\" on the PGIC. No severe side effects or complications were observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our observational study suggests that lumbar facet joint RFA using the novel technique achieves significant pain relief. The larger lesions decrease the likelihood of missing the target nerve while obviating the need to conduct numerous lesions. Limiting is the single-center set-up with a relatively short-term follow-up duration. Randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted to confirm the efficacy of the novel RFA technique to treat lumbar facet joint pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"8871568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679272/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/8871568\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/8871568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰突关节是15%-41%腰痛(LBP)患者疼痛的来源。常规腰椎关节突射频消融术(RFA)在改善疼痛和功能方面具有II级证据。最好的被证实的技术,平行技术,在技术上是具有挑战性的,耗时的,而且往往不舒服的病人。一种新颖的RFA技术,使用三针套管,提供了一个潜在的更简单和更短的过程。目的:介绍一种新型的腰小关节三针插管RFA技术,并评价其治疗慢性腰小关节疼痛的疗效。方法:符合条件的成年慢性腰椎关节突关节痛患者,经内侧分支阻滞(MBBs)阳性证实,保守治疗难治性,采用新型三尖管RFA治疗。与基线相比,2个月随访时疼痛强度的变化,报告疼痛强度减轻≥30%和≥50%的患者百分比,患者总体印象变化(PGIC),止痛药需求,行走能力,睡眠质量和患者满意度进行评估。结果:共纳入44例患者。在随访中,患者经历了临床意义和显著的疼痛缓解,41%的患者报告疼痛减轻≥50%。48%的人在PGIC上至少得到了“很大的改善”。未观察到严重的副作用或并发症。结论:我们的观察性研究表明,使用这种新技术的腰椎小关节RFA可以显著缓解疼痛。较大的病变减少了丢失目标神经的可能性,同时避免了进行大量病变的需要。限制是单中心设置,随访时间相对较短。随机对照临床试验证实了新型射频消融技术治疗腰椎小关节疼痛的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lumbar Facet Joint Radiofrequency Ablation With a 3-Tined Cannula: A Technical Report and Observational Study.

Background: Lumbar facet joints are the source of pain in 15%-41% of individuals experiencing low back pain (LBP). Conventional lumbar facet radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has Level II evidence for improving pain and function. The best proven technique, the parallel technique, is technically challenging, time-consuming, and often uncomfortable for the patient. A novel RFA technique using a 3-tined cannula offers a potentially less complex and shorter procedure. Objectives: To describe the novel lumbar facet joint RFA technique with the 3-tined cannula and to evaluate its efficacy in treating chronic lumbar facet joint pain. Methods: Eligible adult patients with chronic lumbar facet joint pain, confirmed by positive medial branch blocks (MBBs), refractory to conservative treatment, received the novel RFA treatment with the 3-tined cannula. The change in pain intensity at 2 months follow-up compared to baseline, percentage of patients reporting a ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% reduction of pain intensity, patient global impression of change (PGIC), need for pain medication, walking ability, sleep quality, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Results: A total of 44 patients were included. Patients experienced a clinically meaningful and significant pain relief at follow-up and 41% of the patients reported ≥ 50% reduction of pain. Forty-eight percent experienced at least a score of "much improved" on the PGIC. No severe side effects or complications were observed. Conclusions: Our observational study suggests that lumbar facet joint RFA using the novel technique achieves significant pain relief. The larger lesions decrease the likelihood of missing the target nerve while obviating the need to conduct numerous lesions. Limiting is the single-center set-up with a relatively short-term follow-up duration. Randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted to confirm the efficacy of the novel RFA technique to treat lumbar facet joint pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
期刊最新文献
The Concept of Pain in Children Attending Primary School: Implications for School-Based Pain Education. Pharmacological Postoperative Pain Management for Paediatric Dental Extractions Under General Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review. Emerging Therapeutic Modalities and Pharmacotherapies in Neuropathic Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Parallel Randomized Controlled Trials. Neuropathic Component Characteristics in Chronic Secondary Musculoskeletal Pain After Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Fractures: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study. Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on the Incidence of Hypoxia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1