股骨颈骨折髋关节置换术中恢复颈长方法的比较与验证。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Hss Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1177/15563316241306109
Alex J Anatone, Rafa Rahman, Tyler J Uppstrom, Jason L Blevins, Peter K Sculco, William M Ricci
{"title":"股骨颈骨折髋关节置换术中恢复颈长方法的比较与验证。","authors":"Alex J Anatone, Rafa Rahman, Tyler J Uppstrom, Jason L Blevins, Peter K Sculco, William M Ricci","doi":"10.1177/15563316241306109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Restoring leg length during total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fracture is challenging due to the lack of an intact femoral neck on the fractured side. Thus, templating methods typically use size of the intact contralateral hip to estimate length. Common reference points include the distance from the lesser trochanter to the center of the femoral head (LTC) and femoral head diameter (FHD). <i>Objectives</i>: We sought to (1) investigate the LTC:FHD ratio as a preoperative templating method and (2) compare this method with calibrated LTC measurements. <i>Methods</i>: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing primary THA between 2021 and 2022 with recorded intraoperative measurements of LTC and FHD at a single academic orthopedic specialty hospital. Preoperative hip X-rays were used to determine the \"predicted LTC length\" with 2 separate methods: the LTC:FHD ratio yielding the \"Ratio Predicted LTC\" and the calibrated measurements method yielding the \"Calibrated Predicted LTC.\" These measurements were compared with intraoperative measurements of the LTC length to determine accuracy. <i>Results</i>: Sixty-two hips in 59 patients were studied. The ratio predicted LTC and contralateral ratio predicted LTC length showed no significant difference from the intraoperative LTC length with a strong correlation between the 2 measurements (correlation coefficient = 0.77 and 0.80). The calibrated predicted LTC lengths were significantly different from the intraoperative LTC lengths (mean difference, 3.0 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [2.2, 3.8]). <i>Conclusions</i>: This retrospective review suggests the LTC:FHD ratio multiplied by intraoperative FHD may be an accurate method for restoring anatomic femoral head height in THA (LTC<sub>a</sub> = [LTC<sub>r</sub>/FHD<sub>r</sub>] × FHD<sub>a</sub>). This method may be useful in hip fracture populations with distorted proximal femoral anatomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35357,"journal":{"name":"Hss Journal","volume":" ","pages":"15563316241306109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison and Validation of Methods for Restoring Neck Length in Hip Arthroplasty That Can Be Applied for Femoral Neck Fracture.\",\"authors\":\"Alex J Anatone, Rafa Rahman, Tyler J Uppstrom, Jason L Blevins, Peter K Sculco, William M Ricci\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15563316241306109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Restoring leg length during total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fracture is challenging due to the lack of an intact femoral neck on the fractured side. Thus, templating methods typically use size of the intact contralateral hip to estimate length. Common reference points include the distance from the lesser trochanter to the center of the femoral head (LTC) and femoral head diameter (FHD). <i>Objectives</i>: We sought to (1) investigate the LTC:FHD ratio as a preoperative templating method and (2) compare this method with calibrated LTC measurements. <i>Methods</i>: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing primary THA between 2021 and 2022 with recorded intraoperative measurements of LTC and FHD at a single academic orthopedic specialty hospital. Preoperative hip X-rays were used to determine the \\\"predicted LTC length\\\" with 2 separate methods: the LTC:FHD ratio yielding the \\\"Ratio Predicted LTC\\\" and the calibrated measurements method yielding the \\\"Calibrated Predicted LTC.\\\" These measurements were compared with intraoperative measurements of the LTC length to determine accuracy. <i>Results</i>: Sixty-two hips in 59 patients were studied. The ratio predicted LTC and contralateral ratio predicted LTC length showed no significant difference from the intraoperative LTC length with a strong correlation between the 2 measurements (correlation coefficient = 0.77 and 0.80). The calibrated predicted LTC lengths were significantly different from the intraoperative LTC lengths (mean difference, 3.0 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [2.2, 3.8]). <i>Conclusions</i>: This retrospective review suggests the LTC:FHD ratio multiplied by intraoperative FHD may be an accurate method for restoring anatomic femoral head height in THA (LTC<sub>a</sub> = [LTC<sub>r</sub>/FHD<sub>r</sub>] × FHD<sub>a</sub>). This method may be useful in hip fracture populations with distorted proximal femoral anatomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hss Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15563316241306109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672367/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hss Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241306109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hss Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241306109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在股骨颈骨折的全髋关节置换术(THA)中恢复腿长是具有挑战性的,因为骨折侧缺乏完整的股骨颈。因此,模板法通常使用完整对侧髋关节的大小来估计长度。常用的参考点包括小转子到股骨头中心的距离(LTC)和股骨头直径(FHD)。目的:我们试图(1)研究LTC:FHD比率作为术前模板方法,(2)将该方法与校准的LTC测量进行比较。方法:我们对一家学术骨科专科医院在2021年至2022年间接受原发性THA的患者进行了回顾性研究,并记录了术中LTC和FHD的测量。术前髋部x光片通过两种不同的方法确定“预测LTC长度”:LTC:FHD比率产生“比率预测LTC”,校准测量方法产生“校准预测LTC”。将这些测量值与术中LTC长度测量值进行比较,以确定准确性。结果:研究了59例患者的62个髋关节。预测LTC的比值和对侧预测LTC长度的比值与术中LTC长度无显著差异,两者具有较强的相关性(相关系数分别为0.77和0.80)。校正后的预测LTC长度与术中LTC长度有显著差异(平均差3.0 mm;95%置信区间[CI] =[2.2, 3.8])。结论:本回顾性研究提示LTC:FHD比值乘以术中FHD可能是THA术后解剖股骨头高度恢复的准确方法(LTCa = [LTCr/FHDr] × FHDa)。该方法可用于股骨近端解剖畸形的髋部骨折患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison and Validation of Methods for Restoring Neck Length in Hip Arthroplasty That Can Be Applied for Femoral Neck Fracture.

Background: Restoring leg length during total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fracture is challenging due to the lack of an intact femoral neck on the fractured side. Thus, templating methods typically use size of the intact contralateral hip to estimate length. Common reference points include the distance from the lesser trochanter to the center of the femoral head (LTC) and femoral head diameter (FHD). Objectives: We sought to (1) investigate the LTC:FHD ratio as a preoperative templating method and (2) compare this method with calibrated LTC measurements. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing primary THA between 2021 and 2022 with recorded intraoperative measurements of LTC and FHD at a single academic orthopedic specialty hospital. Preoperative hip X-rays were used to determine the "predicted LTC length" with 2 separate methods: the LTC:FHD ratio yielding the "Ratio Predicted LTC" and the calibrated measurements method yielding the "Calibrated Predicted LTC." These measurements were compared with intraoperative measurements of the LTC length to determine accuracy. Results: Sixty-two hips in 59 patients were studied. The ratio predicted LTC and contralateral ratio predicted LTC length showed no significant difference from the intraoperative LTC length with a strong correlation between the 2 measurements (correlation coefficient = 0.77 and 0.80). The calibrated predicted LTC lengths were significantly different from the intraoperative LTC lengths (mean difference, 3.0 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [2.2, 3.8]). Conclusions: This retrospective review suggests the LTC:FHD ratio multiplied by intraoperative FHD may be an accurate method for restoring anatomic femoral head height in THA (LTCa = [LTCr/FHDr] × FHDa). This method may be useful in hip fracture populations with distorted proximal femoral anatomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hss Journal
Hss Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The HSS Journal is the Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. The aim of the HSS Journal is to promote cutting edge research, clinical pathways, and state-of-the-art techniques that inform and facilitate the continuing education of the orthopaedic and musculoskeletal communities. HSS Journal publishes articles that offer contributions to the advancement of the knowledge of musculoskeletal diseases and encourages submission of manuscripts from all musculoskeletal disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Amino Acid Supplementation May Help Prevent Muscle Wasting After Orthopedic Surgery, but Additional Studies Are Warranted: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. Evaluation of the Application of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations on the Classification of Patients With Neck Pain. How Good is Your Doctor? Beyond the Numbers and What it Really Means. Comparison and Validation of Methods for Restoring Neck Length in Hip Arthroplasty That Can Be Applied for Femoral Neck Fracture. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Thrombotic Microangiopathy, and Purtscher-Like Retinopathy in a Patient Who Experienced Resolution With Eculizumab Treatment: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1