IF 7.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of the National Cancer Center Pub Date : 2024-08-19 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jncc.2024.07.002
Aimin Jiang, Ying Liu, Ziwei He, Wenqiang Liu, Qiwei Yang, Yu Fang, Baohua Zhu, Xiaofeng Wu, Huamao Ye, Bicheng Ye, Shunxiang Gao, Le Qu, Wenhao Xu, Peng Luo, Linhui Wang
{"title":"TDERS, an exosome RNA-derived signature predicts prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in clear cell renal cell cancer: a multicohort study.","authors":"Aimin Jiang, Ying Liu, Ziwei He, Wenqiang Liu, Qiwei Yang, Yu Fang, Baohua Zhu, Xiaofeng Wu, Huamao Ye, Bicheng Ye, Shunxiang Gao, Le Qu, Wenhao Xu, Peng Luo, Linhui Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumor-derived exosomes are involved in tumor progression and immune invasion and might function as promising noninvasive approaches for clinical management. However, there are few reports on exosom-based markers for predicting the progression and adjuvant therapy response rate among patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The signatures differentially expressed in exosomes from tumor and normal tissues from ccRCC patients were correspondingly deregulated in ccRCC tissues. We adopted a two-step strategy, including Lasso and bootstrapping, to construct a novel risk stratification system termed the TDERS (Tumor-Derived Exosome-Related Risk Score). During the testing and validation phases, we leveraged multiple external datasets containing over 2000 RCC cases from eight cohorts and one inhouse cohort to evaluate the accuracy of the TDERS. In addition, enrichment analysis, immune infiltration signatures, mutation landscape and therapy sensitivity between the high and low TDERS groups were compared. Finally, the impact of TDERS on the tumor microenvironment (TME) was also analysed in our single-cell datasets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TDERS consisted of 12 mRNAs deregulated in both exosomes and tissues from patients with ccRCC. TDERS achieved satisfactory performance in both prognosis and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response across all ccRCC cohorts and other pathological types, since the average area under the curve (AUC) to predict 5-year overall survival (OS) was larger than 0.8 across the four cohorts. Patients in the TDERS high group were resistant to ICIs, while mercaptopurine might function as a promising agent for those patients. Patients with a high TDERS were characterized by coagulation and hypoxia, which induced hampered tumor antigen presentation and relative resistance to ICIs. In addition, single cells from 12 advanced samples validated this phenomenon since the interaction between dendritic cells and macrophages was limited. Finally, PLOD2, which is highly expressed in fibro- and epi‑tissue, could be a potential therapeutic target for ccRCC patients since inhibiting PLOD2 altered the malignant phenotype of ccRCC <i>in vitro</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a novel, non-invasive, and repeatable monitoring tool, the TDERS could work as a robust risk stratification system for patients with ccRCC and precisely inform treatment decisions about ICI therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 4","pages":"382-394"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jncc.2024.07.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肿瘤衍生的外泌体参与了肿瘤进展和免疫侵袭,可能成为临床治疗的一种有前景的非侵入性方法。然而,关于基于外泌体的标记物预测透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)患者的病情进展和辅助治疗反应率的报道很少:方法:在ccRCC患者的肿瘤组织和正常组织的外泌体中差异表达的标志物在ccRCC组织中相应地发生了脱调。我们采用了包括Lasso和bootstrapping在内的两步策略,构建了一个新的风险分层系统,称为TDERS(肿瘤外泌体相关风险评分)。在测试和验证阶段,我们利用包含来自八个队列和一个内部队列的2000多例RCC病例的多个外部数据集来评估TDERS的准确性。此外,我们还比较了高TDERS组和低TDERS组之间的富集分析、免疫浸润特征、突变情况和治疗敏感性。最后,我们还在单细胞数据集中分析了TDERS对肿瘤微环境(TME)的影响:结果:TDERS包括12个在外泌体和ccRCC患者组织中均发生变化的mRNA。在所有ccRCC队列和其他病理类型中,TDERS在预后和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)反应方面都取得了令人满意的结果,因为在四个队列中,预测5年总生存期(OS)的平均曲线下面积(AUC)大于0.8。TDERS高分组的患者对ICIs有耐药性,而巯嘌呤可能是这些患者的理想药物。TDERS高组患者的特点是凝血和缺氧,这导致了肿瘤抗原呈递障碍和对 ICIs 的相对耐药性。此外,由于树突状细胞和巨噬细胞之间的相互作用受到限制,来自 12 个晚期样本的单细胞验证了这一现象。最后,PLOD2 在纤维组织和表皮组织中高度表达,可以成为 ccRCC 患者的潜在治疗靶点,因为抑制 PLOD2 可以改变体外 ccRCC 的恶性表型:作为一种新颖、无创、可重复的监测工具,TDERS可作为ccRCC患者的可靠风险分层系统,并为ICI治疗决策提供精确信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TDERS, an exosome RNA-derived signature predicts prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in clear cell renal cell cancer: a multicohort study.

Background: Tumor-derived exosomes are involved in tumor progression and immune invasion and might function as promising noninvasive approaches for clinical management. However, there are few reports on exosom-based markers for predicting the progression and adjuvant therapy response rate among patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Methods: The signatures differentially expressed in exosomes from tumor and normal tissues from ccRCC patients were correspondingly deregulated in ccRCC tissues. We adopted a two-step strategy, including Lasso and bootstrapping, to construct a novel risk stratification system termed the TDERS (Tumor-Derived Exosome-Related Risk Score). During the testing and validation phases, we leveraged multiple external datasets containing over 2000 RCC cases from eight cohorts and one inhouse cohort to evaluate the accuracy of the TDERS. In addition, enrichment analysis, immune infiltration signatures, mutation landscape and therapy sensitivity between the high and low TDERS groups were compared. Finally, the impact of TDERS on the tumor microenvironment (TME) was also analysed in our single-cell datasets.

Results: TDERS consisted of 12 mRNAs deregulated in both exosomes and tissues from patients with ccRCC. TDERS achieved satisfactory performance in both prognosis and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response across all ccRCC cohorts and other pathological types, since the average area under the curve (AUC) to predict 5-year overall survival (OS) was larger than 0.8 across the four cohorts. Patients in the TDERS high group were resistant to ICIs, while mercaptopurine might function as a promising agent for those patients. Patients with a high TDERS were characterized by coagulation and hypoxia, which induced hampered tumor antigen presentation and relative resistance to ICIs. In addition, single cells from 12 advanced samples validated this phenomenon since the interaction between dendritic cells and macrophages was limited. Finally, PLOD2, which is highly expressed in fibro- and epi‑tissue, could be a potential therapeutic target for ccRCC patients since inhibiting PLOD2 altered the malignant phenotype of ccRCC in vitro.

Conclusion: As a novel, non-invasive, and repeatable monitoring tool, the TDERS could work as a robust risk stratification system for patients with ccRCC and precisely inform treatment decisions about ICI therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment and triage strategy of cervical cancer primary screening on HPV integration status: 5-year follow-up of a prospective cohort study. Osteoimmunology in bone malignancies: a symphony with evil. Disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow as predictive classifiers for small cell lung cancer patients. Editorial Board TDERS, an exosome RNA-derived signature predicts prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in clear cell renal cell cancer: a multicohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1