没有我,就没有我:与年轻人合作进行心理健康研究。

JCPP advances Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/jcv2.12291
Alex Lloyd, Tom Chin-Han Wu, Laura Lucas, Adeola Agunbiade, Romana Saleh, Pasco Fearon, Essi Viding
{"title":"没有我,就没有我:与年轻人合作进行心理健康研究。","authors":"Alex Lloyd, Tom Chin-Han Wu, Laura Lucas, Adeola Agunbiade, Romana Saleh, Pasco Fearon, Essi Viding","doi":"10.1002/jcv2.12291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Involving young people with lived experience in youth mental health research is important. In recognition of the value of collaborating with experts by experience, international funders are increasingly mandating that mental health research is developed by teams that include individuals from the population of study. Yet, research into how Patient Public Involvement, specifically co-production and co-design, is implemented in youth mental health research is limited to date. The current review examined this question and identified common practices for collaborating with experts by experience in young people's mental health research. Academic databases were systematically searched for studies that had involved young people in mental health research, had described these activities, and had reported some demographic information about the experts by experience. From a total of 2130 studies that were screened, 37 studies were eligible for inclusion. The use of co-production and co-design spanned a wide range of topics, including interventions, digital support tools and psychometric studies. Interactive workshops were the primary method of engaging experts by experience, although some studies utilised interviews or focus groups. From the reviewed studies we identified common methodological practices including: Scene setting, utilising a cyclical process, ensuring appropriate engagement and recognition of the cultural context. We draw on these findings to suggest common methods for conducting co-production and co-design activities, and emphasise the importance of ensuring experts by experience are respected and safeguarded throughout their collaboration in research. We also outline areas that deserve future attention and development, and include a response from two young people aged 16-18 and their suggestions for improving and extending co-production methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":73542,"journal":{"name":"JCPP advances","volume":"4 4","pages":"e12291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No decision about me, without me: Collaborating with young people in mental health research.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Lloyd, Tom Chin-Han Wu, Laura Lucas, Adeola Agunbiade, Romana Saleh, Pasco Fearon, Essi Viding\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcv2.12291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Involving young people with lived experience in youth mental health research is important. In recognition of the value of collaborating with experts by experience, international funders are increasingly mandating that mental health research is developed by teams that include individuals from the population of study. Yet, research into how Patient Public Involvement, specifically co-production and co-design, is implemented in youth mental health research is limited to date. The current review examined this question and identified common practices for collaborating with experts by experience in young people's mental health research. Academic databases were systematically searched for studies that had involved young people in mental health research, had described these activities, and had reported some demographic information about the experts by experience. From a total of 2130 studies that were screened, 37 studies were eligible for inclusion. The use of co-production and co-design spanned a wide range of topics, including interventions, digital support tools and psychometric studies. Interactive workshops were the primary method of engaging experts by experience, although some studies utilised interviews or focus groups. From the reviewed studies we identified common methodological practices including: Scene setting, utilising a cyclical process, ensuring appropriate engagement and recognition of the cultural context. We draw on these findings to suggest common methods for conducting co-production and co-design activities, and emphasise the importance of ensuring experts by experience are respected and safeguarded throughout their collaboration in research. We also outline areas that deserve future attention and development, and include a response from two young people aged 16-18 and their suggestions for improving and extending co-production methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCPP advances\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"e12291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669772/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCPP advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCPP advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

让有生活经验的年轻人参与青年心理健康研究是很重要的。认识到根据经验与专家合作的价值,国际资助者越来越多地要求心理健康研究由包括研究对象个人在内的团队开展。然而,迄今为止,对青少年心理健康研究中如何实施患者公众参与,特别是共同制作和共同设计的研究是有限的。目前的审查审查了这个问题,并确定了在年轻人心理健康研究中与专家合作的常见做法。系统地检索了学术数据库,查找涉及青年人参与心理健康研究的研究,这些研究描述了这些活动,并根据经验报告了有关专家的一些人口统计信息。在总共2130项被筛选的研究中,37项研究符合纳入条件。联合制作和共同设计的使用涵盖了广泛的主题,包括干预措施、数字支持工具和心理测量学研究。虽然有些研究利用访谈或焦点小组,但互动式讲习班是根据经验吸引专家的主要方法。从回顾的研究中,我们确定了常见的方法实践,包括:场景设置,利用循环过程,确保适当的参与和对文化背景的认识。根据这些发现,我们建议开展合作生产和共同设计活动的共同方法,并强调在研究合作过程中确保经验丰富的专家得到尊重和保护的重要性。我们还概述了未来值得关注和发展的领域,并包括两位16-18岁的年轻人的回应以及他们对改进和扩展合作制作方法的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
No decision about me, without me: Collaborating with young people in mental health research.

Involving young people with lived experience in youth mental health research is important. In recognition of the value of collaborating with experts by experience, international funders are increasingly mandating that mental health research is developed by teams that include individuals from the population of study. Yet, research into how Patient Public Involvement, specifically co-production and co-design, is implemented in youth mental health research is limited to date. The current review examined this question and identified common practices for collaborating with experts by experience in young people's mental health research. Academic databases were systematically searched for studies that had involved young people in mental health research, had described these activities, and had reported some demographic information about the experts by experience. From a total of 2130 studies that were screened, 37 studies were eligible for inclusion. The use of co-production and co-design spanned a wide range of topics, including interventions, digital support tools and psychometric studies. Interactive workshops were the primary method of engaging experts by experience, although some studies utilised interviews or focus groups. From the reviewed studies we identified common methodological practices including: Scene setting, utilising a cyclical process, ensuring appropriate engagement and recognition of the cultural context. We draw on these findings to suggest common methods for conducting co-production and co-design activities, and emphasise the importance of ensuring experts by experience are respected and safeguarded throughout their collaboration in research. We also outline areas that deserve future attention and development, and include a response from two young people aged 16-18 and their suggestions for improving and extending co-production methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Camouflaging in neurodivergent and neurotypical girls at the transition to adolescence and its relationship to mental health: A participatory methods research study. Cultivating participatory processes in self-harm app development: A case-study and working methodology. No decision about me, without me: Collaborating with young people in mental health research. Deepening the participation of neurodivergent youth in qualitative mental health research: Co-development of a general approach and the evaluation of its implementation in a study on emotion. Participatory research in child psychology & psychiatry: Embracing untidiness to break new ground.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1