标题:患者对腕管松解术教育的偏好:流行医疗保健网站和 ChatGPT 教育材料的比较。

Nicholas B Pohl, Omar H Tarawneh, Evan Johnson, Daren Aita, Madeline Tadley, Daniel J Fletcher
{"title":"标题:患者对腕管松解术教育的偏好:流行医疗保健网站和 ChatGPT 教育材料的比较。","authors":"Nicholas B Pohl, Omar H Tarawneh, Evan Johnson, Daren Aita, Madeline Tadley, Daniel J Fletcher","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2024.102073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>ChatGPT has been increasingly utilized to create, simplify, and revise hand surgery patient education materials. While significant research has examined the quality and readability of ChatGPT-derived hand surgery patient education, the patient perspective has not previously been evaluated. This study compared patient reported clarity and readability grades as well as patient preferences for carpal tunnel surgery educational information from medical education websites and ChatGPT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients without a history of carpal tunnel release surgery at two orthopaedic hand surgery outpatient clinics were asked to complete an anonymous survey which gathered demographic information and included a blinded educational passage on carpal tunnel release surgery from ChatGPT, WebMD, or Mayo Clinic. Patients graded the blinded passages regarding clarity, readability, length, likeliness to recommend to others, and overall satisfaction with the education material.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in clarity (p = 0.682),readability (p = 0.328), or likeliness to recommend to others (p = 0.106) between the different educational sources. When stratified by age, younger patients (under 55) were more likely to recommend Mayo Clinic over other resources (p = 0.002). When further stratified to include only those who reported previously using websites for healthcare information, patients tended to have a higher likelihood of recommending Mayo Clinic compared to other sources, but this was not a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no differences in clarity, readability, or preference ratings between patient education materials that were produced by ChatGPT, WebMD and Mayo Clinic. However, while ChatGPT-generated materials are comparable in quality based on patient ratings, younger patients may still favor well-established sources for medical education. This information regarding patient preferences provides valuable insights for hand surgeons when selecting suitable educational resources for their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94023,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"102073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TITLE: Patient Preferences for Carpal Tunnel Release Education: A Comparison of Education Materials from Popular Healthcare Websites and ChatGPT.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas B Pohl, Omar H Tarawneh, Evan Johnson, Daren Aita, Madeline Tadley, Daniel J Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hansur.2024.102073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>ChatGPT has been increasingly utilized to create, simplify, and revise hand surgery patient education materials. While significant research has examined the quality and readability of ChatGPT-derived hand surgery patient education, the patient perspective has not previously been evaluated. This study compared patient reported clarity and readability grades as well as patient preferences for carpal tunnel surgery educational information from medical education websites and ChatGPT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients without a history of carpal tunnel release surgery at two orthopaedic hand surgery outpatient clinics were asked to complete an anonymous survey which gathered demographic information and included a blinded educational passage on carpal tunnel release surgery from ChatGPT, WebMD, or Mayo Clinic. Patients graded the blinded passages regarding clarity, readability, length, likeliness to recommend to others, and overall satisfaction with the education material.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in clarity (p = 0.682),readability (p = 0.328), or likeliness to recommend to others (p = 0.106) between the different educational sources. When stratified by age, younger patients (under 55) were more likely to recommend Mayo Clinic over other resources (p = 0.002). When further stratified to include only those who reported previously using websites for healthcare information, patients tended to have a higher likelihood of recommending Mayo Clinic compared to other sources, but this was not a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no differences in clarity, readability, or preference ratings between patient education materials that were produced by ChatGPT, WebMD and Mayo Clinic. However, while ChatGPT-generated materials are comparable in quality based on patient ratings, younger patients may still favor well-established sources for medical education. This information regarding patient preferences provides valuable insights for hand surgeons when selecting suitable educational resources for their patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hand surgery & rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hand surgery & rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2024.102073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2024.102073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ChatGPT已越来越多地用于创建、简化和修改手外科患者教育材料。虽然重要的研究已经检查了chatgpt衍生的手外科患者教育的质量和可读性,但患者的观点以前没有被评估过。本研究比较了患者报告的清晰度和可读性等级,以及患者对来自医学教育网站和ChatGPT的腕管手术教育信息的偏好。方法:在两家骨科手外科门诊没有腕管松解手术史的患者被要求完成一项匿名调查,该调查收集了人口统计信息,并包括ChatGPT、WebMD或Mayo诊所关于腕管松解手术的盲法教育文章。患者对盲法文章的清晰度、可读性、长度、向他人推荐的可能性以及对教育材料的总体满意度进行评分。结果:不同教育资源在清晰度(p = 0.682)、可读性(p = 0.328)和向他人推荐的可能性(p = 0.106)上均无显著差异。当按年龄分层时,年轻患者(55岁以下)更有可能推荐梅奥诊所而不是其他资源(p = 0.002)。当进一步分层,只包括那些报告以前使用过网站的医疗保健信息,患者倾向于有更高的可能性推荐梅奥诊所与其他来源相比,但这并没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:ChatGPT、WebMD和Mayo诊所制作的患者教育材料在清晰度、可读性或偏好评级方面没有差异。然而,虽然chatgpt生成的材料在质量上与患者评分相当,但年轻患者可能仍然倾向于成熟的医学教育来源。这些关于患者偏好的信息为手外科医生为患者选择合适的教育资源提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TITLE: Patient Preferences for Carpal Tunnel Release Education: A Comparison of Education Materials from Popular Healthcare Websites and ChatGPT.

Introduction: ChatGPT has been increasingly utilized to create, simplify, and revise hand surgery patient education materials. While significant research has examined the quality and readability of ChatGPT-derived hand surgery patient education, the patient perspective has not previously been evaluated. This study compared patient reported clarity and readability grades as well as patient preferences for carpal tunnel surgery educational information from medical education websites and ChatGPT.

Methods: Patients without a history of carpal tunnel release surgery at two orthopaedic hand surgery outpatient clinics were asked to complete an anonymous survey which gathered demographic information and included a blinded educational passage on carpal tunnel release surgery from ChatGPT, WebMD, or Mayo Clinic. Patients graded the blinded passages regarding clarity, readability, length, likeliness to recommend to others, and overall satisfaction with the education material.

Results: There were no significant differences in clarity (p = 0.682),readability (p = 0.328), or likeliness to recommend to others (p = 0.106) between the different educational sources. When stratified by age, younger patients (under 55) were more likely to recommend Mayo Clinic over other resources (p = 0.002). When further stratified to include only those who reported previously using websites for healthcare information, patients tended to have a higher likelihood of recommending Mayo Clinic compared to other sources, but this was not a statistically significant difference.

Conclusions: There were no differences in clarity, readability, or preference ratings between patient education materials that were produced by ChatGPT, WebMD and Mayo Clinic. However, while ChatGPT-generated materials are comparable in quality based on patient ratings, younger patients may still favor well-established sources for medical education. This information regarding patient preferences provides valuable insights for hand surgeons when selecting suitable educational resources for their patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome in the Forearm: Ultrasound-Guided surgical technique. Breaking stiffness: A non-invasive solution for proximal interphalangeal joint rigidity. Breaking the cycle: Addressing the drucebo effect in hand rehabilitation. Correspondence. Reply to the article "Cornelis S, Mufty S, Peters S. Isolated distal radioulnar joint septic arthritis, the intact triangular fibrocartilaginous complex serving as an anatomical barrier. Hand Surg Rehabil, January 2025. Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma of the hand in an adult.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1