Md Altaf Hossain, Khushboo Soni, Dominic Agyei, Biniam Kebede, Andrew N Reynolds
{"title":"豆类摄入对心脏代谢特征和肠道微生物组功能的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Md Altaf Hossain, Khushboo Soni, Dominic Agyei, Biniam Kebede, Andrew N Reynolds","doi":"10.1007/s00394-024-03576-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Legumes are widely considered one of the most beneficial food groups to consume. They are high in fibre and plant-based protein as well as naturally low in sodium, saturated fats, and sugars. However, legumes do not feature prominently in the modern diet, and previous evidence syntheses show inconsistent results on cardiometabolic risk profile when increasing legume intakes. This review examines the impact of legume intake on cardiometabolic profile and gut microbiome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMBASE, OVID Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to 15 May 2024 with checking of relevant reference lists and bibliographies. Relevant data were extracted into pre-tested forms and risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2. Searches, screening, and risk of bias assessment were done independently by two reviewers. We have considered trials where legumes were provided to adults, with and without pre-existing conditions (i.e. type 2 diabetes, heart disease or dyslipidaemia), in randomised controlled trials of at least six weeks duration on cardiometabolic risk factors and gut microbiome outcomes. Trial data were pooled using random effects models. Prespecified regression analyses were then performed to identify the factors influencing pooled results. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 30 papers of 24 trials with 33 eligible comparisons where legumes (daily average 86 g (range 2-251)) were provided to 1,938 participants. No eligible studies reported on microbiome outcomes. There was moderate certainty evidence that higher legume intakes improved total cholesterol (mean difference (MD) -0.23mmol/L, 95%CI -0.33 to -0.13), LDL cholesterol (MD -0.16mmol/L (-0.24 to -0.08)), and fasting blood glucose (MD -0.18mmol/L (-0.30 to -0.06)). The majority of trial comparisons (70%) provided an isoenergetic control food. Pooled results were influenced by underlying differences between trials such as type and format of legumes provided, but not consistently across multiple outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing legume intakes improved some blood lipid and glucose parameters, but not all. Isoenergetic comparisons in trials may obscure changes in cardiometabolic risk factors due to greater satiation or reduced intake, and no trials greater than six weeks duration were identified to consider the microbiome-mediated health effects with greater legume intakes. Future trials in these areas are necessary.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospero ID CRD42023456953.</p>","PeriodicalId":12030,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition","volume":"64 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legume intakes on cardiometabolic profile and gut microbiome function: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Md Altaf Hossain, Khushboo Soni, Dominic Agyei, Biniam Kebede, Andrew N Reynolds\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00394-024-03576-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Legumes are widely considered one of the most beneficial food groups to consume. They are high in fibre and plant-based protein as well as naturally low in sodium, saturated fats, and sugars. However, legumes do not feature prominently in the modern diet, and previous evidence syntheses show inconsistent results on cardiometabolic risk profile when increasing legume intakes. This review examines the impact of legume intake on cardiometabolic profile and gut microbiome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMBASE, OVID Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to 15 May 2024 with checking of relevant reference lists and bibliographies. Relevant data were extracted into pre-tested forms and risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2. Searches, screening, and risk of bias assessment were done independently by two reviewers. We have considered trials where legumes were provided to adults, with and without pre-existing conditions (i.e. type 2 diabetes, heart disease or dyslipidaemia), in randomised controlled trials of at least six weeks duration on cardiometabolic risk factors and gut microbiome outcomes. Trial data were pooled using random effects models. Prespecified regression analyses were then performed to identify the factors influencing pooled results. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 30 papers of 24 trials with 33 eligible comparisons where legumes (daily average 86 g (range 2-251)) were provided to 1,938 participants. No eligible studies reported on microbiome outcomes. There was moderate certainty evidence that higher legume intakes improved total cholesterol (mean difference (MD) -0.23mmol/L, 95%CI -0.33 to -0.13), LDL cholesterol (MD -0.16mmol/L (-0.24 to -0.08)), and fasting blood glucose (MD -0.18mmol/L (-0.30 to -0.06)). The majority of trial comparisons (70%) provided an isoenergetic control food. Pooled results were influenced by underlying differences between trials such as type and format of legumes provided, but not consistently across multiple outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing legume intakes improved some blood lipid and glucose parameters, but not all. Isoenergetic comparisons in trials may obscure changes in cardiometabolic risk factors due to greater satiation or reduced intake, and no trials greater than six weeks duration were identified to consider the microbiome-mediated health effects with greater legume intakes. Future trials in these areas are necessary.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospero ID CRD42023456953.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-024-03576-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-024-03576-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:豆类被广泛认为是最有益的食物之一。它们富含纤维和植物性蛋白质,钠、饱和脂肪和糖的天然含量也很低。然而,豆类在现代饮食中并不突出,以前的证据综合表明,增加豆类摄入量对心脏代谢风险的影响结果不一致。本综述探讨了豆类摄入对心脏代谢特征和肠道微生物组的影响。方法:检索EMBASE、OVID Medline和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,检索截止到2024年5月15日的相关参考文献。将相关数据提取到预测试表格中,并使用Cochrane RoB2评估偏倚风险。检索、筛选和偏倚风险评估由两位审稿人独立完成。我们考虑了在至少持续6周的随机对照试验中,为有或没有既往疾病(即2型糖尿病、心脏病或血脂异常)的成年人提供豆类的试验,以研究心脏代谢危险因素和肠道微生物组结果。试验数据采用随机效应模型汇总。然后进行预先指定的回归分析,以确定影响合并结果的因素。用GRADE评价证据的确定性。结果:我们确定了24项试验的30篇论文,其中有33项符合条件的比较,其中豆类(平均每日86克(范围2-251))提供给1938名参与者。没有关于微生物组结果的合格研究报道。有中等确定性的证据表明,较高的豆类摄入量改善了总胆固醇(平均差值(MD) -0.23mmol/L, 95%CI (MD) -0.33至-0.13)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(MD -0.16mmol/L(-0.24至-0.08))和空腹血糖(MD -0.18mmol/L(-0.30至-0.06))。大多数试验比较(70%)提供等能对照食物。合并结果受到试验之间潜在差异的影响,如所提供豆类的类型和格式,但在多个结果中并不一致。结论:增加豆科植物的摄入量可以改善部分血脂和血糖指标,但不是全部。试验中的等能比较可能会模糊由于饱腹感增加或摄入量减少而导致的心脏代谢危险因素的变化,并且没有确定超过六周的试验来考虑微生物组介导的健康影响与更多的豆类摄入量。未来在这些领域的试验是必要的。试验注册:Prospero ID CRD42023456953。
Legume intakes on cardiometabolic profile and gut microbiome function: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
Background: Legumes are widely considered one of the most beneficial food groups to consume. They are high in fibre and plant-based protein as well as naturally low in sodium, saturated fats, and sugars. However, legumes do not feature prominently in the modern diet, and previous evidence syntheses show inconsistent results on cardiometabolic risk profile when increasing legume intakes. This review examines the impact of legume intake on cardiometabolic profile and gut microbiome.
Methods: EMBASE, OVID Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to 15 May 2024 with checking of relevant reference lists and bibliographies. Relevant data were extracted into pre-tested forms and risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2. Searches, screening, and risk of bias assessment were done independently by two reviewers. We have considered trials where legumes were provided to adults, with and without pre-existing conditions (i.e. type 2 diabetes, heart disease or dyslipidaemia), in randomised controlled trials of at least six weeks duration on cardiometabolic risk factors and gut microbiome outcomes. Trial data were pooled using random effects models. Prespecified regression analyses were then performed to identify the factors influencing pooled results. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE.
Results: We identified 30 papers of 24 trials with 33 eligible comparisons where legumes (daily average 86 g (range 2-251)) were provided to 1,938 participants. No eligible studies reported on microbiome outcomes. There was moderate certainty evidence that higher legume intakes improved total cholesterol (mean difference (MD) -0.23mmol/L, 95%CI -0.33 to -0.13), LDL cholesterol (MD -0.16mmol/L (-0.24 to -0.08)), and fasting blood glucose (MD -0.18mmol/L (-0.30 to -0.06)). The majority of trial comparisons (70%) provided an isoenergetic control food. Pooled results were influenced by underlying differences between trials such as type and format of legumes provided, but not consistently across multiple outcomes.
Conclusions: Increasing legume intakes improved some blood lipid and glucose parameters, but not all. Isoenergetic comparisons in trials may obscure changes in cardiometabolic risk factors due to greater satiation or reduced intake, and no trials greater than six weeks duration were identified to consider the microbiome-mediated health effects with greater legume intakes. Future trials in these areas are necessary.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Nutrition publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications in the nutritional sciences. The manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Nutrition should have their major focus on the impact of nutrients and non-nutrients on
immunology and inflammation,
gene expression,
metabolism,
chronic diseases, or
carcinogenesis,
or a major focus on
epidemiology, including intervention studies with healthy subjects and with patients,
biofunctionality of food and food components, or
the impact of diet on the environment.