Diego Hernán Giunta, Diego Sanchez Thomas, Lucrecia Bustamante, Maria Florencia Grande Ratti, Bernardo Julio Martinez
{"title":"基于国家急诊科过度拥挤研究(NEDOCS)评分的急诊科过度拥挤多变量预测模型的开发和验证","authors":"Diego Hernán Giunta, Diego Sanchez Thomas, Lucrecia Bustamante, Maria Florencia Grande Ratti, Bernardo Julio Martinez","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03848-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Predicting potential overcrowding is a significant tool in efficient emergency department (ED) management. Our aim was to develop and validate overcrowding predictive models using accessible and high quality information. Methods Retrospective cohort study of consecutive days in the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires ED from june 2016 to may 2018. We estimated hourly NEDOCS score for the entire period, and defined the outcome as Sustained Critical ED Overcrowding (EDOC) equal to occurrence of 8 or more hours with a NEDOCS score ≥ 180. We generated 3 logistic regression predictive models with different related outcomes: beginning, ending or occurrence of Sustained Critical EDOC. We estimated calibration and discrimination as internal (random validation group and bootstrapping) and external validation (different period and different ED). Results The main model included both the beginning and occurrence of NEDOCS, including weather variables, variables related to NEDOCS itself and patient flow variables. The second model considered only the beginning of Sustained Critical EDOC and included variables related to NEDOCS. The last model considered the end of Sustained Critical EDOC and it included variables related to NEDOCS, weather, bed occupancy and management. Discrimination for the main model had an area under the receiveroperator curve of 0.997 (95% CI 0.994 - 1) in the validation group. Calibration for the model was very high on internal validation and acceptable on external validation. Conclusion The Sustained Critical EDOC predictive model includes variables that are easily obtained and can be used for effective resource management in situations of overcrowding.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a multivariable predictive model for Emergency Department Overcrowding based on the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS) score.\",\"authors\":\"Diego Hernán Giunta, Diego Sanchez Thomas, Lucrecia Bustamante, Maria Florencia Grande Ratti, Bernardo Julio Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-024-03848-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Predicting potential overcrowding is a significant tool in efficient emergency department (ED) management. Our aim was to develop and validate overcrowding predictive models using accessible and high quality information. Methods Retrospective cohort study of consecutive days in the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires ED from june 2016 to may 2018. We estimated hourly NEDOCS score for the entire period, and defined the outcome as Sustained Critical ED Overcrowding (EDOC) equal to occurrence of 8 or more hours with a NEDOCS score ≥ 180. We generated 3 logistic regression predictive models with different related outcomes: beginning, ending or occurrence of Sustained Critical EDOC. We estimated calibration and discrimination as internal (random validation group and bootstrapping) and external validation (different period and different ED). Results The main model included both the beginning and occurrence of NEDOCS, including weather variables, variables related to NEDOCS itself and patient flow variables. The second model considered only the beginning of Sustained Critical EDOC and included variables related to NEDOCS. The last model considered the end of Sustained Critical EDOC and it included variables related to NEDOCS, weather, bed occupancy and management. Discrimination for the main model had an area under the receiveroperator curve of 0.997 (95% CI 0.994 - 1) in the validation group. Calibration for the model was very high on internal validation and acceptable on external validation. Conclusion The Sustained Critical EDOC predictive model includes variables that are easily obtained and can be used for effective resource management in situations of overcrowding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03848-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03848-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景预测潜在的拥挤是有效管理急诊科(ED)的重要工具。我们的目标是利用可访问的高质量信息开发和验证过度拥挤的预测模型。方法回顾性队列研究2016年6月至2018年5月在布宜诺斯艾利斯意大利医院急诊科连续的天数。我们估计了整个时期的每小时NEDOCS评分,并将结果定义为持续临界ED过度拥挤(EDOC),等于发生8小时或更长时间且NEDOCS评分≥180。我们建立了3个具有不同相关结果的逻辑回归预测模型:持续临界EDOC的开始、结束或发生。我们估计校准和鉴别为内部(随机验证组和bootapping)和外部验证(不同时期和不同ED)。结果主要模型包括NEDOCS的开始和发生,包括天气变量、NEDOCS本身相关变量和患者流量变量。第二个模型只考虑持续关键EDOC的开始,并包括与NEDOCS相关的变量。最后一个模型考虑了持续关键EDOC的结束,它包括与nedoc、天气、床位占用和管理相关的变量。在验证组中,主模型的识别面积为0.997 (95% CI 0.994 - 1)。模型的校准在内部验证中非常高,在外部验证中是可接受的。结论持续临界EDOC预测模型包含易于获取的变量,可用于过度拥挤情况下的有效资源管理。
Development and validation of a multivariable predictive model for Emergency Department Overcrowding based on the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS) score.
Background Predicting potential overcrowding is a significant tool in efficient emergency department (ED) management. Our aim was to develop and validate overcrowding predictive models using accessible and high quality information. Methods Retrospective cohort study of consecutive days in the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires ED from june 2016 to may 2018. We estimated hourly NEDOCS score for the entire period, and defined the outcome as Sustained Critical ED Overcrowding (EDOC) equal to occurrence of 8 or more hours with a NEDOCS score ≥ 180. We generated 3 logistic regression predictive models with different related outcomes: beginning, ending or occurrence of Sustained Critical EDOC. We estimated calibration and discrimination as internal (random validation group and bootstrapping) and external validation (different period and different ED). Results The main model included both the beginning and occurrence of NEDOCS, including weather variables, variables related to NEDOCS itself and patient flow variables. The second model considered only the beginning of Sustained Critical EDOC and included variables related to NEDOCS. The last model considered the end of Sustained Critical EDOC and it included variables related to NEDOCS, weather, bed occupancy and management. Discrimination for the main model had an area under the receiveroperator curve of 0.997 (95% CI 0.994 - 1) in the validation group. Calibration for the model was very high on internal validation and acceptable on external validation. Conclusion The Sustained Critical EDOC predictive model includes variables that are easily obtained and can be used for effective resource management in situations of overcrowding.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.