通过常规RCT和N-of-1试验,氯硝西泮在ARID1B患者中的再利用:孤儿病发展的实验策略

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Medical Genetics Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1136/jmg-2024-109951
Pleuntje J van der Sluijs, Koshar Safai Pour, Cécile L Berends, Matthijs D Kruizinga, Annelieke R Müller, Agnies M van Eeghen, Mar Rodríguez-Girondo, Maria J Juachon, Duco Steenbeek, Adam F Cohen, Rob G J A Zuiker, Gijs W E Santen
{"title":"通过常规RCT和N-of-1试验,氯硝西泮在ARID1B患者中的再利用:孤儿病发展的实验策略","authors":"Pleuntje J van der Sluijs, Koshar Safai Pour, Cécile L Berends, Matthijs D Kruizinga, Annelieke R Müller, Agnies M van Eeghen, Mar Rodríguez-Girondo, Maria J Juachon, Duco Steenbeek, Adam F Cohen, Rob G J A Zuiker, Gijs W E Santen","doi":"10.1136/jmg-2024-109951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials for rare disorders have unique challenges due to low prevalence, patient phenotype variability and high expectations. These challenges are highlighted by our study on clonazepam in <i>ARID1B</i> patients, a common cause of intellectual disability. Previous studies on Arid1b-haploinsufficient mice showed positive effects of clonazepam on various cognitive aspects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study (RCT), followed by an N-of-1 design. In the crossover study, <i>ARID1B</i> patients received clonazepam (max 0.5 mg, two times per day) or a placebo for 22 days with a 3-week washout period. Assessments included safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics on neurocognitive tasks, behaviour and cognitive function. During phase I of the N-of-1 trial the optimal dosage and individual treatment goals were determined. Phase II evaluated the treatment effect. This phase was composed of three periods: an open-label period with placebo (4 weeks), followed by a double-blinded period (6 weeks), followed by an open-label period in which the patient received clonazepam (4 weeks).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the clonazepam group (<i>n</i>=16, 15 completing both periods), seven (44%) reported improvement on Clinician Global Impression of Improvement versus two (13%) on placebo. 13 (87%) showed 'no change' after placebo (two (13%) on clonazepam), while seven (44%) on clonazepam reported deterioration, often linked to side effects (<i>n</i>=6), suggesting potential benefit from lower dosing. Three N-of-1 trials with RCT responders saw two patients improve on clonazepam during double-blinding, but clinical evaluation deemed the improvements insufficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our approach shows the feasibility and strength of combining conventional RCT and N-of-1 studies for therapeutic studies in populations with intellectual disabilities, distinguishing real treatment effects from expectation bias. Our findings suggest that clonazepam has no additional therapeutic value in <i>ARID1B</i> patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>EUCTR2019-003558-98, ISRCTN11225608.</p>","PeriodicalId":16237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clonazepam repurposing in <i>ARID1B</i> patients through conventional RCT and N-of-1 trials: an experimental strategy for orphan disease development.\",\"authors\":\"Pleuntje J van der Sluijs, Koshar Safai Pour, Cécile L Berends, Matthijs D Kruizinga, Annelieke R Müller, Agnies M van Eeghen, Mar Rodríguez-Girondo, Maria J Juachon, Duco Steenbeek, Adam F Cohen, Rob G J A Zuiker, Gijs W E Santen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jmg-2024-109951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials for rare disorders have unique challenges due to low prevalence, patient phenotype variability and high expectations. These challenges are highlighted by our study on clonazepam in <i>ARID1B</i> patients, a common cause of intellectual disability. Previous studies on Arid1b-haploinsufficient mice showed positive effects of clonazepam on various cognitive aspects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study (RCT), followed by an N-of-1 design. In the crossover study, <i>ARID1B</i> patients received clonazepam (max 0.5 mg, two times per day) or a placebo for 22 days with a 3-week washout period. Assessments included safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics on neurocognitive tasks, behaviour and cognitive function. During phase I of the N-of-1 trial the optimal dosage and individual treatment goals were determined. Phase II evaluated the treatment effect. This phase was composed of three periods: an open-label period with placebo (4 weeks), followed by a double-blinded period (6 weeks), followed by an open-label period in which the patient received clonazepam (4 weeks).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the clonazepam group (<i>n</i>=16, 15 completing both periods), seven (44%) reported improvement on Clinician Global Impression of Improvement versus two (13%) on placebo. 13 (87%) showed 'no change' after placebo (two (13%) on clonazepam), while seven (44%) on clonazepam reported deterioration, often linked to side effects (<i>n</i>=6), suggesting potential benefit from lower dosing. Three N-of-1 trials with RCT responders saw two patients improve on clonazepam during double-blinding, but clinical evaluation deemed the improvements insufficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our approach shows the feasibility and strength of combining conventional RCT and N-of-1 studies for therapeutic studies in populations with intellectual disabilities, distinguishing real treatment effects from expectation bias. Our findings suggest that clonazepam has no additional therapeutic value in <i>ARID1B</i> patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>EUCTR2019-003558-98, ISRCTN11225608.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2024-109951\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2024-109951","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:罕见疾病的临床试验由于低患病率、患者表型变异性和高期望而面临独特的挑战。我们对ARID1B患者氯硝西泮的研究突出了这些挑战,ARID1B是智力残疾的常见原因。先前对arid1b -单倍体不足小鼠的研究显示氯硝西泮对多个认知方面有积极作用。方法:本研究采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、双向交叉研究(RCT),采用n of 1设计。在交叉研究中,ARID1B患者接受氯硝西泮(最大0.5 mg,每天两次)或安慰剂治疗22天,洗脱期为3周。评估包括安全性、耐受性、药代动力学、神经认知任务的药效学、行为和认知功能。在N-of-1试验的I期期间,确定了最佳剂量和个体治疗目标。第二阶段评估治疗效果。该阶段由三个阶段组成:安慰剂的开放标签期(4周),然后是双盲期(6周),然后是患者接受氯硝西泮的开放标签期(4周)。结果:在氯硝西泮组(n=16, 15人完成两个疗程)中,7人(44%)报告临床医生总体印象改善,而安慰剂组只有2人(13%)。13例(87%)患者在服用安慰剂后“没有变化”(2例(13%)服用氯硝西泮),而7例(44%)患者服用氯硝西泮后病情恶化,通常与副作用有关(n=6),表明低剂量可能有益。三个随机对照试验的N-of-1反应者在双盲期间看到两名患者氯硝西泮改善,但临床评估认为改善不足。结论:我们的方法显示了将传统RCT和N-of-1研究相结合用于智力残疾人群治疗性研究的可行性和优势,区分了实际治疗效果和期望偏差。我们的研究结果表明氯硝西泮对ARID1B患者没有额外的治疗价值。试验注册号:EUCTR2019-003558-98, ISRCTN11225608。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clonazepam repurposing in ARID1B patients through conventional RCT and N-of-1 trials: an experimental strategy for orphan disease development.

Background: Clinical trials for rare disorders have unique challenges due to low prevalence, patient phenotype variability and high expectations. These challenges are highlighted by our study on clonazepam in ARID1B patients, a common cause of intellectual disability. Previous studies on Arid1b-haploinsufficient mice showed positive effects of clonazepam on various cognitive aspects.

Methods: This study used a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study (RCT), followed by an N-of-1 design. In the crossover study, ARID1B patients received clonazepam (max 0.5 mg, two times per day) or a placebo for 22 days with a 3-week washout period. Assessments included safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics on neurocognitive tasks, behaviour and cognitive function. During phase I of the N-of-1 trial the optimal dosage and individual treatment goals were determined. Phase II evaluated the treatment effect. This phase was composed of three periods: an open-label period with placebo (4 weeks), followed by a double-blinded period (6 weeks), followed by an open-label period in which the patient received clonazepam (4 weeks).

Results: In the clonazepam group (n=16, 15 completing both periods), seven (44%) reported improvement on Clinician Global Impression of Improvement versus two (13%) on placebo. 13 (87%) showed 'no change' after placebo (two (13%) on clonazepam), while seven (44%) on clonazepam reported deterioration, often linked to side effects (n=6), suggesting potential benefit from lower dosing. Three N-of-1 trials with RCT responders saw two patients improve on clonazepam during double-blinding, but clinical evaluation deemed the improvements insufficient.

Conclusions: Our approach shows the feasibility and strength of combining conventional RCT and N-of-1 studies for therapeutic studies in populations with intellectual disabilities, distinguishing real treatment effects from expectation bias. Our findings suggest that clonazepam has no additional therapeutic value in ARID1B patients.

Trial registration number: EUCTR2019-003558-98, ISRCTN11225608.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Genetics
Journal of Medical Genetics 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
92
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Genetics is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering original research in human genetics, including reviews of and opinion on the latest developments. Articles cover the molecular basis of human disease including germline cancer genetics, clinical manifestations of genetic disorders, applications of molecular genetics to medical practice and the systematic evaluation of such applications worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Commentary on Estimating cancer risk in carriers of Lynch syndrome variants in UK Biobank. KIF21A-associated peripheral neuropathy defined by impaired binding with TUBB3. Tumour spectrum in AKT1-related Proteus syndrome: a systematic review of clinical reports and series. Portraying the full picture of Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome: a systematic review of literature. Aortic and arterial manifestations and clinical features in TGFB3-related heritable thoracic aortic disease: results from the Montalcino Aortic Consortium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1