使用非光栅轨迹的光学相干层析成像的多准则评估。

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 MICROSCOPY Journal of microscopy Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1111/jmi.13383
Nahashon O Osinde, Nicolas Andreff
{"title":"使用非光栅轨迹的光学相干层析成像的多准则评估。","authors":"Nahashon O Osinde, Nicolas Andreff","doi":"10.1111/jmi.13383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents a qualitative, quantitative, and experimental analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) volumes obtained using different families of non-raster trajectories. We propose a multicriteria analysis to be used in the assessment of scan trajectories used in obtaining OCT volumetric point cloud data. The novel criteria includes exploitation/exploration ratio of the OCT data obtained, smoothness of the scan trajectory and fast preview of the acquired OCT data in addition to conventional criteria; time and quality (expressed as volume similarity rather than slice-by-slice image quality). The set of criteria proposed will be useful in assessing OCT scan trajectories for optimisation in various applications including robot assisted in vivo optical biopsy. We show in this paper that the rate of data acquisition is improved without degrading the OCT volume quality by scanning using non-raster trajectories (they are fast, smooth, and make the galvanometer scanners have less wear and tear). In particular, the rosette scan trajectory, which was the preferred non-raster trajectory, provided a balanced performance in having better clarity at the centre and periphery of the scanned object.</p>","PeriodicalId":16484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicriteria assessment of optical coherence tomography using non-raster trajectories.\",\"authors\":\"Nahashon O Osinde, Nicolas Andreff\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmi.13383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article presents a qualitative, quantitative, and experimental analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) volumes obtained using different families of non-raster trajectories. We propose a multicriteria analysis to be used in the assessment of scan trajectories used in obtaining OCT volumetric point cloud data. The novel criteria includes exploitation/exploration ratio of the OCT data obtained, smoothness of the scan trajectory and fast preview of the acquired OCT data in addition to conventional criteria; time and quality (expressed as volume similarity rather than slice-by-slice image quality). The set of criteria proposed will be useful in assessing OCT scan trajectories for optimisation in various applications including robot assisted in vivo optical biopsy. We show in this paper that the rate of data acquisition is improved without degrading the OCT volume quality by scanning using non-raster trajectories (they are fast, smooth, and make the galvanometer scanners have less wear and tear). In particular, the rosette scan trajectory, which was the preferred non-raster trajectory, provided a balanced performance in having better clarity at the centre and periphery of the scanned object.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.13383\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROSCOPY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microscopy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.13383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了使用不同非光栅轨迹族获得的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)体积的定性,定量和实验分析。我们提出了一种多标准分析,用于评估用于获得OCT体积点云数据的扫描轨迹。除了常规标准外,该标准还包括所获得OCT数据的开发/勘探比、扫描轨迹的平滑性和所获得OCT数据的快速预览;时间和质量(表示为体积相似度,而不是逐片图像质量)。提出的一套标准将有助于评估OCT扫描轨迹,以优化各种应用,包括机器人辅助的体内光学活检。我们在本文中表明,通过使用非光栅轨迹(它们快速,光滑,并且使振镜扫描仪磨损更少)进行扫描,在不降低OCT体积质量的情况下提高了数据采集速率。特别是,玫瑰花形扫描轨迹作为首选的非光栅轨迹,在扫描对象的中心和外围具有更好的清晰度方面提供了平衡的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multicriteria assessment of optical coherence tomography using non-raster trajectories.

This article presents a qualitative, quantitative, and experimental analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) volumes obtained using different families of non-raster trajectories. We propose a multicriteria analysis to be used in the assessment of scan trajectories used in obtaining OCT volumetric point cloud data. The novel criteria includes exploitation/exploration ratio of the OCT data obtained, smoothness of the scan trajectory and fast preview of the acquired OCT data in addition to conventional criteria; time and quality (expressed as volume similarity rather than slice-by-slice image quality). The set of criteria proposed will be useful in assessing OCT scan trajectories for optimisation in various applications including robot assisted in vivo optical biopsy. We show in this paper that the rate of data acquisition is improved without degrading the OCT volume quality by scanning using non-raster trajectories (they are fast, smooth, and make the galvanometer scanners have less wear and tear). In particular, the rosette scan trajectory, which was the preferred non-raster trajectory, provided a balanced performance in having better clarity at the centre and periphery of the scanned object.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of microscopy
Journal of microscopy 工程技术-显微镜技术
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Microscopy is the oldest journal dedicated to the science of microscopy and the only peer-reviewed publication of the Royal Microscopical Society. It publishes papers that report on the very latest developments in microscopy such as advances in microscopy techniques or novel areas of application. The Journal does not seek to publish routine applications of microscopy or specimen preparation even though the submission may otherwise have a high scientific merit. The scope covers research in the physical and biological sciences and covers imaging methods using light, electrons, X-rays and other radiations as well as atomic force and near field techniques. Interdisciplinary research is welcome. Papers pertaining to microscopy are also welcomed on optical theory, spectroscopy, novel specimen preparation and manipulation methods and image recording, processing and analysis including dynamic analysis of living specimens. Publication types include full papers, hot topic fast tracked communications and review articles. Authors considering submitting a review article should contact the editorial office first.
期刊最新文献
TUNA-EBSD-CL correlative multi-microscopy study, on the example of Cu(In,Ga)S2 solar cell absorber. Automated Euler number of the alveolar capillary network based on deep learning segmentation with verification by stereological methods. Native state structural and chemical characterisation of Pickering emulsions: A cryo-electron microscopy study. Introduction to special issue '12th International Botanical Microscopy Meeting'. ApoNecV: A macro for cell death type differentiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1