基于机器学习算法确定心理困扰风险的基于网络的计算器的开发和验证:对342名肺癌患者的横断面研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-09127-5
Xu Tian, Haoyang Li, Feili Li, María F Jiménez-Herrera, Yi Ren, Hongcai Shang
{"title":"基于机器学习算法确定心理困扰风险的基于网络的计算器的开发和验证:对342名肺癌患者的横断面研究。","authors":"Xu Tian, Haoyang Li, Feili Li, María F Jiménez-Herrera, Yi Ren, Hongcai Shang","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09127-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Early and accurate identification of the risk of psychological distress allows for timely intervention and improved prognosis. Current methods for predicting psychological distress among lung cancer patients using readily available data are limited. This study aimed to develop a robust machine learning (ML) model for determining the risk of psychological distress among lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was designed to collect data from 342 lung cancer patients. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection. Model training and validation were conducted with bootstrap resampling method. Fivefold cross-validation evaluated and optimized the model with parameter tuning. Feature importance was assessed using SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model identified seven independent risk factors of psychological distress: residence (β = 0.141), diagnosis duration (β = 0.055), TNM stage (β = 0.098), pain severity (β = 0.067), perceived stigma (β = 0.052), illness perception (β = 0.100), and coping style (β = 0.097). Among the eight ML algorithms evaluated, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm demonstrated the highest performance with AUROC values of 0.988, 0.945, and 0.922 for the training, validation, and test sets, respectively. The model's results were further explained using SHAP, which revealed the importance and contribution of each risk factor to the overall distress risk. A web-based tool was developed based on this model to facilitate clinical use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The XGBoost classifier demonstrated exceptional performance, and clinical implementation of the web-based risk calculator can serve as an easy-to-use tool for health practitioners to formulate early prevention and intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a web-based calculator for determining the risk of psychological distress based on machine learning algorithms: A cross-sectional study of 342 lung cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Xu Tian, Haoyang Li, Feili Li, María F Jiménez-Herrera, Yi Ren, Hongcai Shang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-024-09127-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Early and accurate identification of the risk of psychological distress allows for timely intervention and improved prognosis. Current methods for predicting psychological distress among lung cancer patients using readily available data are limited. This study aimed to develop a robust machine learning (ML) model for determining the risk of psychological distress among lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was designed to collect data from 342 lung cancer patients. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection. Model training and validation were conducted with bootstrap resampling method. Fivefold cross-validation evaluated and optimized the model with parameter tuning. Feature importance was assessed using SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model identified seven independent risk factors of psychological distress: residence (β = 0.141), diagnosis duration (β = 0.055), TNM stage (β = 0.098), pain severity (β = 0.067), perceived stigma (β = 0.052), illness perception (β = 0.100), and coping style (β = 0.097). Among the eight ML algorithms evaluated, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm demonstrated the highest performance with AUROC values of 0.988, 0.945, and 0.922 for the training, validation, and test sets, respectively. The model's results were further explained using SHAP, which revealed the importance and contribution of each risk factor to the overall distress risk. A web-based tool was developed based on this model to facilitate clinical use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The XGBoost classifier demonstrated exceptional performance, and clinical implementation of the web-based risk calculator can serve as an easy-to-use tool for health practitioners to formulate early prevention and intervention strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09127-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09127-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:早期准确识别心理困扰风险,及时干预,改善预后。目前使用现成数据预测肺癌患者心理困扰的方法是有限的。本研究旨在开发一个强大的机器学习(ML)模型来确定肺癌患者的心理困扰风险。方法:采用横断面研究方法收集342例肺癌患者的资料。最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)用于特征选择。采用自举重采样方法对模型进行训练和验证。五重交叉验证通过参数调整对模型进行评估和优化。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)方法评估特征重要性。结果:模型识别出心理困扰的7个独立危险因素:居住地(β = 0.141)、诊断持续时间(β = 0.055)、TNM分期(β = 0.098)、疼痛严重程度(β = 0.067)、污名感(β = 0.052)、疾病认知(β = 0.100)和应对方式(β = 0.097)。在评估的8种ML算法中,极端梯度增强(XGBoost)算法在训练集、验证集和测试集的AUROC值分别为0.988、0.945和0.922,表现出最高的性能。使用SHAP进一步解释了模型的结果,揭示了每个风险因素对整体窘迫风险的重要性和贡献。基于该模型开发了一个基于网络的工具,以方便临床使用。结论:XGBoost分类器表现出卓越的性能,基于web的风险计算器的临床实施可以作为卫生从业人员制定早期预防和干预策略的易于使用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of a web-based calculator for determining the risk of psychological distress based on machine learning algorithms: A cross-sectional study of 342 lung cancer patients.

Purpose: Early and accurate identification of the risk of psychological distress allows for timely intervention and improved prognosis. Current methods for predicting psychological distress among lung cancer patients using readily available data are limited. This study aimed to develop a robust machine learning (ML) model for determining the risk of psychological distress among lung cancer patients.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed to collect data from 342 lung cancer patients. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection. Model training and validation were conducted with bootstrap resampling method. Fivefold cross-validation evaluated and optimized the model with parameter tuning. Feature importance was assessed using SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.

Results: The model identified seven independent risk factors of psychological distress: residence (β = 0.141), diagnosis duration (β = 0.055), TNM stage (β = 0.098), pain severity (β = 0.067), perceived stigma (β = 0.052), illness perception (β = 0.100), and coping style (β = 0.097). Among the eight ML algorithms evaluated, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm demonstrated the highest performance with AUROC values of 0.988, 0.945, and 0.922 for the training, validation, and test sets, respectively. The model's results were further explained using SHAP, which revealed the importance and contribution of each risk factor to the overall distress risk. A web-based tool was developed based on this model to facilitate clinical use.

Conclusion: The XGBoost classifier demonstrated exceptional performance, and clinical implementation of the web-based risk calculator can serve as an easy-to-use tool for health practitioners to formulate early prevention and intervention strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Behind the label: a qualitative study of the self-perceptions of individuals with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Strategies to manage the adverse effects of immunotherapy with dinutuximab beta in neuroblastoma: an Italian experience and literature review. A critical review of randomized controlled trials on topical corticosteroids for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer. Care for patients with cancer and substance use disorders: a qualitative study of oncology team experiences. Clinical features, procalcitonin concentration, and bacterial infection in febrile hospitalized cancer patients: a descriptive study and association analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1