{"title":"桃子成分特异性IgE测量有助于区分桃子过敏日本患者的局部和全身反应。","authors":"Yusuke Ando, Sakura Sato, Motohiro Ebisawa, Shiro Sugiura, Komei Ito, Mizuho Nagao, Takao Fujisawa, Shigemi Yoshihara","doi":"10.1016/j.alit.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Component-resolved diagnostics are used to diagnose food allergies. Currently, reports on sensitization profiles using peach-allergen components in a multicenter setting are lacking. In this study, sensitization profiling of peach allergy was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of each component specific-immunoglobulin E antibody (sIgE ab) test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-seven patients with peach allergy were enrolled at four Japanese centers and classified into a local reaction group (LR) with only oral or pharyngeal mucosal symptoms in 36 patients and a systemic reaction group (SR) without LR in 31 patients. Serum sIgE ab tests to peach crude, Pru p 1, Pru p 3, Pru p 4, Pru p 7, and tree pollen were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Pru p 1 had the highest area under the curve (AUC) for diagnosing LR, followed by Pru p 4, which outperformed peach crude allergen. Pru p 7 had the highest AUC for diagnosing SR, with the other peach allergen components and peach crude allergen showing lower values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sensitization to Pru p 1 was associated with LRs, while sensitization to Pru p 7 was associated with SRs; approximately one-third of patients in the SR group tested negative for the titer of peach crude sIgE ab, many of whom tested positive for the titer of Pru p 7 sIgE ab. We conclude that measuring Pru p 1, Pru p 4, and Pru p 7 sIgE ab titers is useful to differentiate LRs and SRs in peach-allergic Japanese patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48861,"journal":{"name":"Allergology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peach component-specific IgE measurement helps to differentiate between local and systemic reactions in peach-allergic Japanese patients.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Ando, Sakura Sato, Motohiro Ebisawa, Shiro Sugiura, Komei Ito, Mizuho Nagao, Takao Fujisawa, Shigemi Yoshihara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.alit.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Component-resolved diagnostics are used to diagnose food allergies. Currently, reports on sensitization profiles using peach-allergen components in a multicenter setting are lacking. In this study, sensitization profiling of peach allergy was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of each component specific-immunoglobulin E antibody (sIgE ab) test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-seven patients with peach allergy were enrolled at four Japanese centers and classified into a local reaction group (LR) with only oral or pharyngeal mucosal symptoms in 36 patients and a systemic reaction group (SR) without LR in 31 patients. Serum sIgE ab tests to peach crude, Pru p 1, Pru p 3, Pru p 4, Pru p 7, and tree pollen were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Pru p 1 had the highest area under the curve (AUC) for diagnosing LR, followed by Pru p 4, which outperformed peach crude allergen. Pru p 7 had the highest AUC for diagnosing SR, with the other peach allergen components and peach crude allergen showing lower values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sensitization to Pru p 1 was associated with LRs, while sensitization to Pru p 7 was associated with SRs; approximately one-third of patients in the SR group tested negative for the titer of peach crude sIgE ab, many of whom tested positive for the titer of Pru p 7 sIgE ab. We conclude that measuring Pru p 1, Pru p 4, and Pru p 7 sIgE ab titers is useful to differentiate LRs and SRs in peach-allergic Japanese patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alit.2024.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alit.2024.09.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peach component-specific IgE measurement helps to differentiate between local and systemic reactions in peach-allergic Japanese patients.
Background: Component-resolved diagnostics are used to diagnose food allergies. Currently, reports on sensitization profiles using peach-allergen components in a multicenter setting are lacking. In this study, sensitization profiling of peach allergy was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of each component specific-immunoglobulin E antibody (sIgE ab) test.
Methods: Sixty-seven patients with peach allergy were enrolled at four Japanese centers and classified into a local reaction group (LR) with only oral or pharyngeal mucosal symptoms in 36 patients and a systemic reaction group (SR) without LR in 31 patients. Serum sIgE ab tests to peach crude, Pru p 1, Pru p 3, Pru p 4, Pru p 7, and tree pollen were conducted.
Results: In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Pru p 1 had the highest area under the curve (AUC) for diagnosing LR, followed by Pru p 4, which outperformed peach crude allergen. Pru p 7 had the highest AUC for diagnosing SR, with the other peach allergen components and peach crude allergen showing lower values.
Conclusions: Sensitization to Pru p 1 was associated with LRs, while sensitization to Pru p 7 was associated with SRs; approximately one-third of patients in the SR group tested negative for the titer of peach crude sIgE ab, many of whom tested positive for the titer of Pru p 7 sIgE ab. We conclude that measuring Pru p 1, Pru p 4, and Pru p 7 sIgE ab titers is useful to differentiate LRs and SRs in peach-allergic Japanese patients.
期刊介绍:
Allergology International is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology and publishes original papers dealing with the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of allergic and related diseases. Papers may include the study of methods of controlling allergic reactions, human and animal models of hypersensitivity and other aspects of basic and applied clinical allergy in its broadest sense.
The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and encourages authors from all countries to submit papers in the following three categories: Original Articles, Review Articles, and Letters to the Editor.