流行病传播建模:高斯过程回归方法

IF 2.4 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IEEE Control Systems Letters Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1109/LCSYS.2024.3517457
Baike She;Lei Xin;Philip E. Paré;Matthew Hale
{"title":"流行病传播建模:高斯过程回归方法","authors":"Baike She;Lei Xin;Philip E. Paré;Matthew Hale","doi":"10.1109/LCSYS.2024.3517457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modeling epidemic spread is critical for informing policy decisions aimed at mitigation. Accordingly, in this letter we present a new data-driven method based on Gaussian process regression (GPR) to model epidemic spread through the difference on the logarithmic scale of the infected cases. We bound the variance of the predictions made by GPR, which quantifies the impact of epidemic data on the proposed model. Next, we derive a high-probability error bound on the prediction error in terms of the distance between the training points and a testing point, the posterior variance, and the level of change in the spreading process, and we assess how the characteristics of the epidemic spread and infection data influence this error bound. We present examples that use GPR to model and predict epidemic spread by using real-world infection data gathered in the U.K. during the COVID-19 epidemic. These examples illustrate that, under typical conditions, the prediction for the next twenty days has 94.29% of the noisy data located within the 95% confidence interval, validating these predictions. We further compare the modeling and prediction results with other methods, such as polynomial regression, k-nearest neighbors (KNN) regression, and neural networks, to demonstrate the benefits of leveraging GPR in disease spread modeling.","PeriodicalId":37235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Control Systems Letters","volume":"8 ","pages":"2847-2852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Epidemic Spread: A Gaussian Process Regression Approach\",\"authors\":\"Baike She;Lei Xin;Philip E. Paré;Matthew Hale\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LCSYS.2024.3517457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modeling epidemic spread is critical for informing policy decisions aimed at mitigation. Accordingly, in this letter we present a new data-driven method based on Gaussian process regression (GPR) to model epidemic spread through the difference on the logarithmic scale of the infected cases. We bound the variance of the predictions made by GPR, which quantifies the impact of epidemic data on the proposed model. Next, we derive a high-probability error bound on the prediction error in terms of the distance between the training points and a testing point, the posterior variance, and the level of change in the spreading process, and we assess how the characteristics of the epidemic spread and infection data influence this error bound. We present examples that use GPR to model and predict epidemic spread by using real-world infection data gathered in the U.K. during the COVID-19 epidemic. These examples illustrate that, under typical conditions, the prediction for the next twenty days has 94.29% of the noisy data located within the 95% confidence interval, validating these predictions. We further compare the modeling and prediction results with other methods, such as polynomial regression, k-nearest neighbors (KNN) regression, and neural networks, to demonstrate the benefits of leveraging GPR in disease spread modeling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Control Systems Letters\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"2847-2852\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Control Systems Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10798625/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Control Systems Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10798625/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建立流行病传播模型对于为旨在缓解疫情的政策决策提供信息至关重要。因此,在本文中,我们提出了一种基于高斯过程回归(GPR)的数据驱动方法,通过感染病例的对数尺度上的差异来模拟流行病的传播。我们对探地雷达预测的方差进行了绑定,这量化了流行病数据对所提出模型的影响。接下来,我们根据训练点与测试点之间的距离、后验方差和传播过程中的变化水平推导出预测误差的高概率误差界,并评估流行病传播和感染数据的特征如何影响该误差界。我们展示了使用GPR建模和预测流行病传播的示例,这些示例使用了在COVID-19流行期间在英国收集的真实感染数据。这些例子表明,在典型条件下,对未来20天的预测有94.29%的噪声数据位于95%的置信区间内,验证了这些预测。我们进一步将建模和预测结果与其他方法(如多项式回归、k近邻(KNN)回归和神经网络)进行比较,以证明利用GPR进行疾病传播建模的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling Epidemic Spread: A Gaussian Process Regression Approach
Modeling epidemic spread is critical for informing policy decisions aimed at mitigation. Accordingly, in this letter we present a new data-driven method based on Gaussian process regression (GPR) to model epidemic spread through the difference on the logarithmic scale of the infected cases. We bound the variance of the predictions made by GPR, which quantifies the impact of epidemic data on the proposed model. Next, we derive a high-probability error bound on the prediction error in terms of the distance between the training points and a testing point, the posterior variance, and the level of change in the spreading process, and we assess how the characteristics of the epidemic spread and infection data influence this error bound. We present examples that use GPR to model and predict epidemic spread by using real-world infection data gathered in the U.K. during the COVID-19 epidemic. These examples illustrate that, under typical conditions, the prediction for the next twenty days has 94.29% of the noisy data located within the 95% confidence interval, validating these predictions. We further compare the modeling and prediction results with other methods, such as polynomial regression, k-nearest neighbors (KNN) regression, and neural networks, to demonstrate the benefits of leveraging GPR in disease spread modeling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Control Systems Letters
IEEE Control Systems Letters Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
471
期刊最新文献
Data-Driven Analysis of T-Product-Based Dynamical Systems Novel Sufficient Conditions for Stabilization of Linear Positive Discrete-Time Systems Using Event-Triggered Control Modified Finite-Time and Prescribed-Time Convergence Parameter Estimators via the DREM Method Refined Eigenvalue Decay Bounds for Controllability Gramians of Sparsely-Actuated Symmetric LTI Systems Distributed Thompson Sampling Under Constrained Communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1