基于app干预预防产后抑郁的随机临床试验方案。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107800
Ellen Poleshuck , Debra Fox , Beau Abar , Daniel Maeng , Tamara Bilinski , Lauren Beers , Jules Rosen , Caron Zlotnick
{"title":"基于app干预预防产后抑郁的随机临床试验方案。","authors":"Ellen Poleshuck ,&nbsp;Debra Fox ,&nbsp;Beau Abar ,&nbsp;Daniel Maeng ,&nbsp;Tamara Bilinski ,&nbsp;Lauren Beers ,&nbsp;Jules Rosen ,&nbsp;Caron Zlotnick","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an asynchronously delivered app, InBloom, for postpartum depression (PPD) prevention relative to an evidence-based synchronously delivered in-person intervention, ROSE (Reach Out, Stay Strong, Essentials for mothers of newborns) for depression and return on investment via a prospective randomized controlled trial and quasi-experimental cohort analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>PPD affects 1 in 7 gestational parents in the US, causing emotional distress, consequences for infant development and child adjustment, disruptions in family relationships, and financial burden. ROSE is an evidence-based intervention administered as four in-person group sessions plus one postpartum booster session. Despite ROSE's demonstrated effectiveness, pragmatic barriers impact disseminating an in-vivo group intervention broadly to people at risk for PPD. If effective, an app may help overcome implementation barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We will develop an app based on the ROSE intervention, recruit 152 pregnant people ≥18 years, 17–32 weeks' gestation, and with risk factors for PPD, and randomize participants either to InBloom or ROSE. Primary outcomes are depression and return on investment (ROI). Hypothesized mechanisms are perceived access, engagement, and satisfaction with the intervention. Control groups include historical control subjects from the largest ROSE trial for depression outcomes and Electronic Health Record (EHR) data on concurrent patients from the same clinics not offered InBloom or ROSE for ROI outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>At the end of the trial, we will know if InBloom is a viable alternative to ROSE, allowing further implementation studies of an easy, low-cost distribution app to reduce risk of PPD.</div><div><span><span><strong>ClinicalTrials.gov</strong></span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <strong>Registration Identifier:</strong> <span><span>NCT05518162</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107800"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized clinical trial protocol of an app-based intervention to prevent postpartum depression\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Poleshuck ,&nbsp;Debra Fox ,&nbsp;Beau Abar ,&nbsp;Daniel Maeng ,&nbsp;Tamara Bilinski ,&nbsp;Lauren Beers ,&nbsp;Jules Rosen ,&nbsp;Caron Zlotnick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an asynchronously delivered app, InBloom, for postpartum depression (PPD) prevention relative to an evidence-based synchronously delivered in-person intervention, ROSE (Reach Out, Stay Strong, Essentials for mothers of newborns) for depression and return on investment via a prospective randomized controlled trial and quasi-experimental cohort analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>PPD affects 1 in 7 gestational parents in the US, causing emotional distress, consequences for infant development and child adjustment, disruptions in family relationships, and financial burden. ROSE is an evidence-based intervention administered as four in-person group sessions plus one postpartum booster session. Despite ROSE's demonstrated effectiveness, pragmatic barriers impact disseminating an in-vivo group intervention broadly to people at risk for PPD. If effective, an app may help overcome implementation barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We will develop an app based on the ROSE intervention, recruit 152 pregnant people ≥18 years, 17–32 weeks' gestation, and with risk factors for PPD, and randomize participants either to InBloom or ROSE. Primary outcomes are depression and return on investment (ROI). Hypothesized mechanisms are perceived access, engagement, and satisfaction with the intervention. Control groups include historical control subjects from the largest ROSE trial for depression outcomes and Electronic Health Record (EHR) data on concurrent patients from the same clinics not offered InBloom or ROSE for ROI outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>At the end of the trial, we will know if InBloom is a viable alternative to ROSE, allowing further implementation studies of an easy, low-cost distribution app to reduce risk of PPD.</div><div><span><span><strong>ClinicalTrials.gov</strong></span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <strong>Registration Identifier:</strong> <span><span>NCT05518162</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"149 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424003835\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424003835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过前瞻性随机对照试验和准实验队列分析,开发和评估异步交付应用InBloom在预防产后抑郁症(PPD)方面的有效性,以及基于证据的同步交付现场干预ROSE (Reach Out, Stay Strong, Essentials for the mothers of neonatal)对抑郁症的治疗效果和投资回报。背景:在美国,产后抑郁症影响了七分之一的妊娠父母,造成情绪困扰,影响婴儿发育和儿童适应,破坏家庭关系,并造成经济负担。ROSE是一种基于证据的干预措施,包括四次面对面的小组会议和一次产后加强会议。尽管ROSE证明了其有效性,但实际障碍影响了将体内组干预广泛传播给PPD风险人群。应用程序可能有助于克服实现障碍。设计:我们将在ROSE干预的基础上开发一款app,招募年龄≥18 岁,妊娠17-32 周,且存在PPD危险因素的孕妇152名,随机分为InBloom组和ROSE组。主要结果是抑郁和投资回报率(ROI)。假设的机制是感知到的介入、参与和对干预的满意度。对照组包括来自最大的抑郁症结果ROSE试验的历史对照受试者和来自同一诊所的并发患者的电子健康记录(EHR)数据,这些患者没有提供InBloom或ROSE的ROI结果。结论:在试验结束时,我们将知道InBloom是否是ROSE的可行替代方案,从而允许进一步实施研究一个简单,低成本的分销应用程序,以降低PPD的风险。临床试验:gov注册标识符:NCT05518162。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Randomized clinical trial protocol of an app-based intervention to prevent postpartum depression

Purpose

To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an asynchronously delivered app, InBloom, for postpartum depression (PPD) prevention relative to an evidence-based synchronously delivered in-person intervention, ROSE (Reach Out, Stay Strong, Essentials for mothers of newborns) for depression and return on investment via a prospective randomized controlled trial and quasi-experimental cohort analyses.

Background

PPD affects 1 in 7 gestational parents in the US, causing emotional distress, consequences for infant development and child adjustment, disruptions in family relationships, and financial burden. ROSE is an evidence-based intervention administered as four in-person group sessions plus one postpartum booster session. Despite ROSE's demonstrated effectiveness, pragmatic barriers impact disseminating an in-vivo group intervention broadly to people at risk for PPD. If effective, an app may help overcome implementation barriers.

Design

We will develop an app based on the ROSE intervention, recruit 152 pregnant people ≥18 years, 17–32 weeks' gestation, and with risk factors for PPD, and randomize participants either to InBloom or ROSE. Primary outcomes are depression and return on investment (ROI). Hypothesized mechanisms are perceived access, engagement, and satisfaction with the intervention. Control groups include historical control subjects from the largest ROSE trial for depression outcomes and Electronic Health Record (EHR) data on concurrent patients from the same clinics not offered InBloom or ROSE for ROI outcomes.

Conclusion

At the end of the trial, we will know if InBloom is a viable alternative to ROSE, allowing further implementation studies of an easy, low-cost distribution app to reduce risk of PPD.
ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Identifier: NCT05518162
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Preventing "tipping points" in high comorbidity patients: A lifeline from health coaches - rationale, design and methods. Protocol for a hybrid type 1 randomized clinical trial of a parenting intervention to enhance family well-being in underserved populations. Monitoring in pragmatic trials lessons from the NIH pragmatic trials collaboratory Editorial Board Impact of informative censoring on estimation and testing in randomized trials with delayed treatment effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1