开发一种快速筛选器,以引出患者对停药的偏好。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Epilepsy & Behavior Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110240
Samuel W Terman, Jordan M Silva, Max Kuster, Jasper Lee, Amanda Brand, Kara Manuel, Navya Kalia, Micaela Dugan, Marla Reid, Katherine Mortati, Alexandra Tolmasov, Palak S Patel, James F Burke, Arthur C Grant, Susanna S O'Kula, Chloe E Hill
{"title":"开发一种快速筛选器,以引出患者对停药的偏好。","authors":"Samuel W Terman, Jordan M Silva, Max Kuster, Jasper Lee, Amanda Brand, Kara Manuel, Navya Kalia, Micaela Dugan, Marla Reid, Katherine Mortati, Alexandra Tolmasov, Palak S Patel, James F Burke, Arthur C Grant, Susanna S O'Kula, Chloe E Hill","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While guidelines encourage individualized discussions of the risks and benefits of antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal after a period of seizure-freedom, no formal methods exist for assessing patient preferences. We report the initial development of a rapid patient preferences screener.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study of adults who were ≥1 year seizure-free and seen for epilepsy across three institutions. We reviewed existing questionnaires and adapted three questions measuring core constructs influencing ASM decisions - views about ASMs, driving restrictions, and seizures. We added one additional \"global\" question, for 4 total questions. Participants rated question clarity and utility from 1 (low) to 7 (high).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 32 participants, the median patient age was 46 (interquartile range [IQR] 33-56), with a median 3 years since their last seizure (IQR 2-11). Median responses were: 2 (IQR 1-5) for being bothered by ASMs, 2 (IQR 1-6) for feeling that a driving restriction would be disruptive, and 5 (IQR 4-7) for feeling that another seizure would be serious. Respondents tended to disagree that ASMs are doing more harm than good (median 1, IQR 1-2). Participants rated question clarity (median 6, IQR 6-7) and utility (median 7, IQR 6-7) highly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We report the initial development of a pre-visit rapid screener of patient preferences pertinent to ASM withdrawal in well-controlled epilepsy. Patients endorsed the utility of such a screener and provided guidance to improve items. We hope that this work will ultimately improve shared decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"163 ","pages":"110240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a rapid screener to elicit patient preferences for antiseizure medication discontinuation.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel W Terman, Jordan M Silva, Max Kuster, Jasper Lee, Amanda Brand, Kara Manuel, Navya Kalia, Micaela Dugan, Marla Reid, Katherine Mortati, Alexandra Tolmasov, Palak S Patel, James F Burke, Arthur C Grant, Susanna S O'Kula, Chloe E Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While guidelines encourage individualized discussions of the risks and benefits of antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal after a period of seizure-freedom, no formal methods exist for assessing patient preferences. We report the initial development of a rapid patient preferences screener.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study of adults who were ≥1 year seizure-free and seen for epilepsy across three institutions. We reviewed existing questionnaires and adapted three questions measuring core constructs influencing ASM decisions - views about ASMs, driving restrictions, and seizures. We added one additional \\\"global\\\" question, for 4 total questions. Participants rated question clarity and utility from 1 (low) to 7 (high).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 32 participants, the median patient age was 46 (interquartile range [IQR] 33-56), with a median 3 years since their last seizure (IQR 2-11). Median responses were: 2 (IQR 1-5) for being bothered by ASMs, 2 (IQR 1-6) for feeling that a driving restriction would be disruptive, and 5 (IQR 4-7) for feeling that another seizure would be serious. Respondents tended to disagree that ASMs are doing more harm than good (median 1, IQR 1-2). Participants rated question clarity (median 6, IQR 6-7) and utility (median 7, IQR 6-7) highly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We report the initial development of a pre-visit rapid screener of patient preferences pertinent to ASM withdrawal in well-controlled epilepsy. Patients endorsed the utility of such a screener and provided guidance to improve items. We hope that this work will ultimately improve shared decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"163 \",\"pages\":\"110240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110240\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然指南鼓励个体化讨论抗癫痫药物(ASM)在一段时间无发作后停药的风险和益处,但没有正式的方法来评估患者的偏好。我们报告了快速患者偏好筛选器的初步发展。方法:我们进行了一项混合方法研究,研究对象是在三家机构中无癫痫发作≥1年的成人。我们回顾了现有的调查问卷,并改编了三个衡量影响ASM决策的核心结构的问题——对ASM的看法、驾驶限制和癫痫发作。我们增加了一个额外的“全局”问题,总共有4个问题。参与者将问题的清晰度和实用性从1(低)到7(高)打分。结果:在32名参与者中,患者年龄中位数为46岁(四分位数范围[IQR] 33-56),距最后一次癫痫发作的中位数为3年(IQR 2-11)。中位反应为:2 (IQR 1-5)表示被asm困扰,2 (IQR 1-6)表示感觉驾驶限制会造成干扰,5 (IQR 4-7)表示感觉再次发作会很严重。受访者倾向于不同意asm弊大于利(中位数1,IQR 1-2)。参与者高度评价问题的清晰度(中位数为6,IQR 6-7)和实用性(中位数为7,IQR 6-7)。结论:我们报告了一种与控制良好的癫痫患者ASM戒断相关的患者偏好的会诊前快速筛查的初步发展。患者认可这种筛选器的实用性,并提供改进项目的指导。我们希望这项工作最终能改善共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a rapid screener to elicit patient preferences for antiseizure medication discontinuation.

Objective: While guidelines encourage individualized discussions of the risks and benefits of antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal after a period of seizure-freedom, no formal methods exist for assessing patient preferences. We report the initial development of a rapid patient preferences screener.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study of adults who were ≥1 year seizure-free and seen for epilepsy across three institutions. We reviewed existing questionnaires and adapted three questions measuring core constructs influencing ASM decisions - views about ASMs, driving restrictions, and seizures. We added one additional "global" question, for 4 total questions. Participants rated question clarity and utility from 1 (low) to 7 (high).

Results: Of 32 participants, the median patient age was 46 (interquartile range [IQR] 33-56), with a median 3 years since their last seizure (IQR 2-11). Median responses were: 2 (IQR 1-5) for being bothered by ASMs, 2 (IQR 1-6) for feeling that a driving restriction would be disruptive, and 5 (IQR 4-7) for feeling that another seizure would be serious. Respondents tended to disagree that ASMs are doing more harm than good (median 1, IQR 1-2). Participants rated question clarity (median 6, IQR 6-7) and utility (median 7, IQR 6-7) highly.

Conclusions: We report the initial development of a pre-visit rapid screener of patient preferences pertinent to ASM withdrawal in well-controlled epilepsy. Patients endorsed the utility of such a screener and provided guidance to improve items. We hope that this work will ultimately improve shared decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
期刊最新文献
A computer-assisted rehabilitation program improves self-management, cognition, and quality of life in epilepsy: A randomized controlled trial. Caregiving burden for adults with epilepsy and coping strategies, a systematic review. Cognitive and behavioral impact of antiseizure medications, neuromodulation, ketogenic diet, and surgery in lennox-gastaut syndrome: A comprehensive review. Incidence of RINCH in pediatric EMU patients. The attitude of medical students, resident doctors, and nurses toward people with epilepsy: A multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1