硬膜外针与导管注射负荷剂量分娩镇痛的比较研究:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002077
XiaoPing Chen, YingYing Tang, QingQing Yu, LiHong Sun, Hua Li, LuYang Wang, Cuicui Jiao, XinZhong Chen
{"title":"硬膜外针与导管注射负荷剂量分娩镇痛的比较研究:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验。","authors":"XiaoPing Chen, YingYing Tang, QingQing Yu, LiHong Sun, Hua Li, LuYang Wang, Cuicui Jiao, XinZhong Chen","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid onset of epidural analgesia is an important concern for the parturient. Commonly, the local anaesthetic mixture is administered through the epidural catheter. Drugs administered through the epidural needle might decrease the onset time and enhance the spread of medication within the epidural space.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to compare the onset time of analgesia when a loading dose of dilute local anaesthetic opioid mixture was injected through either the Tuohy needle or a single end-hole epidural catheter.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single university hospital, from November 2022 to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 200 healthy nulliparous women who requested epidural analgesia for labour were randomly allocated to the needle group (n = 100) or the catheter group (n = 100).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>In the needle group, after identification of the epidural space, a test dose of 3 ml 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.3 μg ml-1 sufentanil was injected through the Tuohy needle followed 3 min later by a 15 ml loading dose of the same mixture over 30 s. Then the catheter was inserted into the epidural space. In the catheter group, after identification of the epidural space, a catheter was advanced into the epidural space and the ropivacaine/sufentanil mixture was injected in an identical manner though the catheter.</p><p><strong>Main outcome mearsures: </strong>The primary outcome was the onset time of labour analgesia (defined as the time from drug administration to adequate analgesia). Adequate analgesia was defined as a visual analogue score 10 mm or less during uterine contractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median [IQR] onset time of labour analgesia did not differ significantly between the two groups (needle group: 20 [16 to 30] minutes; catheter group: 20 [15 to 25] minutes, P = 0.232).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with bolus injection though a single end-hole epidural catheter, injection through the epidural needle did not shorten the analgesia onset time for adequate labour analgesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05594771).</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"42 2","pages":"113-121"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of labour analgesia onset with injection of loading dose through epidural needle versus catheter: A prospective, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"XiaoPing Chen, YingYing Tang, QingQing Yu, LiHong Sun, Hua Li, LuYang Wang, Cuicui Jiao, XinZhong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid onset of epidural analgesia is an important concern for the parturient. Commonly, the local anaesthetic mixture is administered through the epidural catheter. Drugs administered through the epidural needle might decrease the onset time and enhance the spread of medication within the epidural space.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to compare the onset time of analgesia when a loading dose of dilute local anaesthetic opioid mixture was injected through either the Tuohy needle or a single end-hole epidural catheter.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single university hospital, from November 2022 to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 200 healthy nulliparous women who requested epidural analgesia for labour were randomly allocated to the needle group (n = 100) or the catheter group (n = 100).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>In the needle group, after identification of the epidural space, a test dose of 3 ml 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.3 μg ml-1 sufentanil was injected through the Tuohy needle followed 3 min later by a 15 ml loading dose of the same mixture over 30 s. Then the catheter was inserted into the epidural space. In the catheter group, after identification of the epidural space, a catheter was advanced into the epidural space and the ropivacaine/sufentanil mixture was injected in an identical manner though the catheter.</p><p><strong>Main outcome mearsures: </strong>The primary outcome was the onset time of labour analgesia (defined as the time from drug administration to adequate analgesia). Adequate analgesia was defined as a visual analogue score 10 mm or less during uterine contractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median [IQR] onset time of labour analgesia did not differ significantly between the two groups (needle group: 20 [16 to 30] minutes; catheter group: 20 [15 to 25] minutes, P = 0.232).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with bolus injection though a single end-hole epidural catheter, injection through the epidural needle did not shorten the analgesia onset time for adequate labour analgesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05594771).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"113-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:硬膜外快速镇痛对产妇来说是一个重要的问题。通常,局部麻醉混合物通过硬膜外导管给予。通过硬膜外穿刺针给药可以缩短起药时间,增强药物在硬膜外腔内的扩散。目的:本研究的主要目的是比较通过Tuohy针或单端孔硬膜外导管注射负荷剂量的稀释局部麻醉阿片类药物混合物时镇痛的起效时间。设计:前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验。地点:单一的大学医院,从2022年11月到2023年8月。参与者:200名要求硬膜外镇痛的健康无产妇女随机分为针组(n = 100)和导管组(n = 100)。干预措施:针组在识别硬膜外间隙后,先用Tuohy针注射0.1%罗哌卡因3 ml加舒芬太尼0.3 μg ml-1的试验剂量,3 min后再加相同混合物15 ml,持续30 s。然后将导管插入硬膜外腔。导管组在识别硬膜外间隙后,将导管置入硬膜外间隙,并以相同方式通过导管注射罗哌卡因/舒芬太尼混合物。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为分娩镇痛开始时间(定义为从给药到充分镇痛的时间)。充分的镇痛被定义为子宫收缩时视觉模拟评分小于等于10毫米。结果:两组分娩镇痛起效中位数[IQR]无显著差异(针组:20[16 ~ 30]分钟;导管组:20 [15 ~ 25]min, P = 0.232)。结论:与单端孔硬膜外置管大剂量注射相比,硬膜外针注射并没有缩短分娩镇痛的起效时间。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05594771)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of labour analgesia onset with injection of loading dose through epidural needle versus catheter: A prospective, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.

Background: Rapid onset of epidural analgesia is an important concern for the parturient. Commonly, the local anaesthetic mixture is administered through the epidural catheter. Drugs administered through the epidural needle might decrease the onset time and enhance the spread of medication within the epidural space.

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to compare the onset time of analgesia when a loading dose of dilute local anaesthetic opioid mixture was injected through either the Tuohy needle or a single end-hole epidural catheter.

Design: A prospective, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.

Setting: Single university hospital, from November 2022 to August 2023.

Participants: A total of 200 healthy nulliparous women who requested epidural analgesia for labour were randomly allocated to the needle group (n = 100) or the catheter group (n = 100).

Interventions: In the needle group, after identification of the epidural space, a test dose of 3 ml 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.3 μg ml-1 sufentanil was injected through the Tuohy needle followed 3 min later by a 15 ml loading dose of the same mixture over 30 s. Then the catheter was inserted into the epidural space. In the catheter group, after identification of the epidural space, a catheter was advanced into the epidural space and the ropivacaine/sufentanil mixture was injected in an identical manner though the catheter.

Main outcome mearsures: The primary outcome was the onset time of labour analgesia (defined as the time from drug administration to adequate analgesia). Adequate analgesia was defined as a visual analogue score 10 mm or less during uterine contractions.

Results: Median [IQR] onset time of labour analgesia did not differ significantly between the two groups (needle group: 20 [16 to 30] minutes; catheter group: 20 [15 to 25] minutes, P = 0.232).

Conclusion: Compared with bolus injection though a single end-hole epidural catheter, injection through the epidural needle did not shorten the analgesia onset time for adequate labour analgesia.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05594771).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
期刊最新文献
Subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for epigastric cardiac pacemaker operation: A randomised controlled trial. Comparison between ultrasound-guided intertransverse process and erector spinae plane blocks for breast cancer surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Postoperative lymphopaenia as a risk factor for postoperative infections in cancer surgery: A prospective multicentre cohort study (the EVALYMPH study). A novel cricoid pressure sensor device enhances the efficacy of oesophageal occlusion during Sellick's manoeuvre: A randomised controlled trial. Co-administration of dexmedetomidine with total intravenous anaesthesia in carotid endarterectomy reduces requirements for propofol and improves haemodynamic stability: A single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1