Manuel Jose Marte, Erin Carpenter, Michael Scimeca, Marissa Russell-Meill, Claudia Peñaloza, Uli Grasemann, Risto Miikkulainen, Swathi Kiran
{"title":"机器学习对双语卒中后失语症康复的预测:将洞察力与临床证据相结合。","authors":"Manuel Jose Marte, Erin Carpenter, Michael Scimeca, Marissa Russell-Meill, Claudia Peñaloza, Uli Grasemann, Risto Miikkulainen, Swathi Kiran","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting treated language improvement (TLI) and transfer to the untreated language (cross-language generalization, CLG) after speech-language therapy in bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia is crucial for personalized treatment planning. This study evaluated machine learning models to predict TLI and CLG and identified the key predictive features (eg, patient severity, demographics, and treatment variables) aligning with clinical evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight Spanish-English bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia received 20 sessions of semantic feature-based naming treatment in either their first or second language. Comprehensive language, cognitive, and background bilingual experience assessments were administered pre- and post-treatment. Sixteen curated features spanning demographics, language abilities, cognition, and bilingual experience were used as inputs to 6 machine learning algorithms to predict treatment responders versus nonresponders and CLG vs no CLG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top 2 machine learning models achieved F1 scores of 0.767±0.153 for TLI and 0.790±0.172 for CLG. Interpretability analyses revealed that aphasia severity in the trained language, education, and cognitive performance were key predictors of TLI. Aphasia severity in the untreated language and cognitive performance emerged as influential features of CLG. These aligned with expectations based on prior literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For the first time, machine learning models reveal that factors such as patient severity and demographics predict TLI and CLG after therapy in Spanish-English bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia. Consideration of both treated and untreated language severity, as well as cognitive assessment performance, when forecasting treatment outcomes in an underserved population such Spanish-English stroke survivors, can meaningfully impact their short-term and long-term clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"494-504"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Predictions of Recovery in Bilingual Poststroke Aphasia: Aligning Insights With Clinical Evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Jose Marte, Erin Carpenter, Michael Scimeca, Marissa Russell-Meill, Claudia Peñaloza, Uli Grasemann, Risto Miikkulainen, Swathi Kiran\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting treated language improvement (TLI) and transfer to the untreated language (cross-language generalization, CLG) after speech-language therapy in bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia is crucial for personalized treatment planning. This study evaluated machine learning models to predict TLI and CLG and identified the key predictive features (eg, patient severity, demographics, and treatment variables) aligning with clinical evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight Spanish-English bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia received 20 sessions of semantic feature-based naming treatment in either their first or second language. Comprehensive language, cognitive, and background bilingual experience assessments were administered pre- and post-treatment. Sixteen curated features spanning demographics, language abilities, cognition, and bilingual experience were used as inputs to 6 machine learning algorithms to predict treatment responders versus nonresponders and CLG vs no CLG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top 2 machine learning models achieved F1 scores of 0.767±0.153 for TLI and 0.790±0.172 for CLG. Interpretability analyses revealed that aphasia severity in the trained language, education, and cognitive performance were key predictors of TLI. Aphasia severity in the untreated language and cognitive performance emerged as influential features of CLG. These aligned with expectations based on prior literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For the first time, machine learning models reveal that factors such as patient severity and demographics predict TLI and CLG after therapy in Spanish-English bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia. Consideration of both treated and untreated language severity, as well as cognitive assessment performance, when forecasting treatment outcomes in an underserved population such Spanish-English stroke survivors, can meaningfully impact their short-term and long-term clinical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"494-504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772114/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047867\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047867","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine Learning Predictions of Recovery in Bilingual Poststroke Aphasia: Aligning Insights With Clinical Evidence.
Background: Predicting treated language improvement (TLI) and transfer to the untreated language (cross-language generalization, CLG) after speech-language therapy in bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia is crucial for personalized treatment planning. This study evaluated machine learning models to predict TLI and CLG and identified the key predictive features (eg, patient severity, demographics, and treatment variables) aligning with clinical evidence.
Methods: Forty-eight Spanish-English bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia received 20 sessions of semantic feature-based naming treatment in either their first or second language. Comprehensive language, cognitive, and background bilingual experience assessments were administered pre- and post-treatment. Sixteen curated features spanning demographics, language abilities, cognition, and bilingual experience were used as inputs to 6 machine learning algorithms to predict treatment responders versus nonresponders and CLG vs no CLG.
Results: The top 2 machine learning models achieved F1 scores of 0.767±0.153 for TLI and 0.790±0.172 for CLG. Interpretability analyses revealed that aphasia severity in the trained language, education, and cognitive performance were key predictors of TLI. Aphasia severity in the untreated language and cognitive performance emerged as influential features of CLG. These aligned with expectations based on prior literature.
Conclusions: For the first time, machine learning models reveal that factors such as patient severity and demographics predict TLI and CLG after therapy in Spanish-English bilingual individuals with poststroke aphasia. Consideration of both treated and untreated language severity, as well as cognitive assessment performance, when forecasting treatment outcomes in an underserved population such Spanish-English stroke survivors, can meaningfully impact their short-term and long-term clinical care.
期刊介绍:
Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery.
The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists.
Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.