Varina L Boerwinkle, Mary A Nowlen, Jesus E Vazquez, Martin A Arhin, William R Reuther, Emilio G Cediel, Patrick J McCarty, Iliana Manjón, Jubran H Jubran, Ashley C Guest, Kirsten D Gillette, Frances M Nowlen, Andrew R Pines, Meitra H Kazemi, Bahjat F Qaqish
{"title":"静息状态fMRI癫痫发作定位荟萃分析:比较rs-fMRI与其他方式,包括手术结果。","authors":"Varina L Boerwinkle, Mary A Nowlen, Jesus E Vazquez, Martin A Arhin, William R Reuther, Emilio G Cediel, Patrick J McCarty, Iliana Manjón, Jubran H Jubran, Ashley C Guest, Kirsten D Gillette, Frances M Nowlen, Andrew R Pines, Meitra H Kazemi, Bahjat F Qaqish","doi":"10.3389/fnimg.2024.1481858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) may localize the seizure onset zone (SOZ) for epilepsy surgery, when compared to intracranial EEG and surgical outcomes, per a prior meta-analysis. Our goals were to further characterize this agreement, by broadening the queried rs-fMRI analysis subtypes, comparative modalities, and same-modality comparisons, hypothesizing SOZ-signal strength may overcome this heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar between April 2010 and April 2020 via PRISMA guidelines for SOZ-to-established-modalities were screened. Odd ratios measured agreement between SOZ and other modalities. Fixed- and random-effects analyses evaluated heterogeneity of odd ratios, with the former evaluating differences in agreement across modalities and same-modality studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 9,550 of 14,384 were non-duplicative articles and 25 met inclusion criteria. Comparative modalities were EEG 7, surgical outcome 6, intracranial EEG 5, anatomical MRI 4, EEG-fMRI 2, and magnetoencephalography 1. Independent component analysis 9 and seed-based analysis 8 were top rs-fMRI methods. Study-level odds ratio heterogeneity in both the fixed- and random-effects analysis was significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Marked cross-modality and same-modality systematic differences in agreement between rs-fMRI and the comparator were present (<i>p</i> = 0.005 and <i>p</i> = 0.002), respectively, with surgical outcomes having higher agreement than EEG (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and iEEG (<i>p</i> = 0.007). The estimated population mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 and 0.09, with predicted values across studies ranging from 0.44 to 0.96 and 0.02 to 0.67, respectively.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>We evaluated centrality and heterogeneity in SOZ agreement between rs-fMRI and comparative modalities using a wider variety of rs-fMRI analyzing subtypes and comparative modalities, compared to prior. Strong evidence for between-study differences in the agreement odds ratio was shown by both the fixed- and the random-effects analyses, attributed to rs-fMRI analysis variability. Agreement with rs-fMRI differed by modality type, with surgical outcomes having higher agreement than EEG and iEEG. Overall, sensitivity was high, but specificity was low, which may be attributed in part to differences between other modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73094,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","volume":"3 ","pages":"1481858"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resting-state fMRI seizure onset localization meta-analysis: comparing rs-fMRI to other modalities including surgical outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Varina L Boerwinkle, Mary A Nowlen, Jesus E Vazquez, Martin A Arhin, William R Reuther, Emilio G Cediel, Patrick J McCarty, Iliana Manjón, Jubran H Jubran, Ashley C Guest, Kirsten D Gillette, Frances M Nowlen, Andrew R Pines, Meitra H Kazemi, Bahjat F Qaqish\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnimg.2024.1481858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) may localize the seizure onset zone (SOZ) for epilepsy surgery, when compared to intracranial EEG and surgical outcomes, per a prior meta-analysis. Our goals were to further characterize this agreement, by broadening the queried rs-fMRI analysis subtypes, comparative modalities, and same-modality comparisons, hypothesizing SOZ-signal strength may overcome this heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar between April 2010 and April 2020 via PRISMA guidelines for SOZ-to-established-modalities were screened. Odd ratios measured agreement between SOZ and other modalities. Fixed- and random-effects analyses evaluated heterogeneity of odd ratios, with the former evaluating differences in agreement across modalities and same-modality studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 9,550 of 14,384 were non-duplicative articles and 25 met inclusion criteria. Comparative modalities were EEG 7, surgical outcome 6, intracranial EEG 5, anatomical MRI 4, EEG-fMRI 2, and magnetoencephalography 1. Independent component analysis 9 and seed-based analysis 8 were top rs-fMRI methods. Study-level odds ratio heterogeneity in both the fixed- and random-effects analysis was significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Marked cross-modality and same-modality systematic differences in agreement between rs-fMRI and the comparator were present (<i>p</i> = 0.005 and <i>p</i> = 0.002), respectively, with surgical outcomes having higher agreement than EEG (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and iEEG (<i>p</i> = 0.007). The estimated population mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 and 0.09, with predicted values across studies ranging from 0.44 to 0.96 and 0.02 to 0.67, respectively.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>We evaluated centrality and heterogeneity in SOZ agreement between rs-fMRI and comparative modalities using a wider variety of rs-fMRI analyzing subtypes and comparative modalities, compared to prior. Strong evidence for between-study differences in the agreement odds ratio was shown by both the fixed- and the random-effects analyses, attributed to rs-fMRI analysis variability. Agreement with rs-fMRI differed by modality type, with surgical outcomes having higher agreement than EEG and iEEG. Overall, sensitivity was high, but specificity was low, which may be attributed in part to differences between other modalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"1481858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685199/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnimg.2024.1481858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnimg.2024.1481858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:根据先前的荟萃分析,与颅内脑电图和手术结果相比,静息状态功能MRI (rs-fMRI)可以定位癫痫手术的发作区(SOZ)。我们的目标是通过扩大查询的rs-fMRI分析亚型、比较模式和同模比较来进一步表征这种一致性,假设soz信号强度可以克服这种异质性。方法:2010年4月至2020年4月期间,通过PRISMA指南筛选PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar。奇数比测量了SOZ和其他模式之间的一致性。固定效应和随机效应分析评估奇数比的异质性,前者评估不同模式和相同模式研究的一致性差异。结果:14384篇文献中无重复文献9550篇,符合纳入标准25篇。比较方式为EEG 7、手术结果6、颅内EEG 5、解剖MRI 4、EEG- fmri 2、脑磁图1。独立成分分析(Independent component analysis)和种子分析(seed-based analysis)是fmri的首选方法。学习水平比值比异质性在固定和随机分析显著(p p = 0.005和0.002 p = ),分别与手术结果协议高于脑电图(p = 0.002)和iEEG (p = 0.007)。估计人群平均敏感性和特异性分别为0.91和0.09,各研究的预测值分别为0.44至0.96和0.02至0.67。意义:与之前相比,我们使用更广泛的rs-fMRI分析亚型和比较模式来评估rs-fMRI和比较模式之间SOZ一致性的中心性和异质性。由于rs-fMRI分析的可变性,固定效应和随机效应分析都显示了研究间一致性优势比差异的有力证据。rs-fMRI结果的一致性因模式类型而异,手术结果的一致性高于脑电图和脑电图。总体而言,敏感性高,但特异性低,这可能部分归因于其他模式之间的差异。
Resting-state fMRI seizure onset localization meta-analysis: comparing rs-fMRI to other modalities including surgical outcomes.
Objective: Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) may localize the seizure onset zone (SOZ) for epilepsy surgery, when compared to intracranial EEG and surgical outcomes, per a prior meta-analysis. Our goals were to further characterize this agreement, by broadening the queried rs-fMRI analysis subtypes, comparative modalities, and same-modality comparisons, hypothesizing SOZ-signal strength may overcome this heterogeneity.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar between April 2010 and April 2020 via PRISMA guidelines for SOZ-to-established-modalities were screened. Odd ratios measured agreement between SOZ and other modalities. Fixed- and random-effects analyses evaluated heterogeneity of odd ratios, with the former evaluating differences in agreement across modalities and same-modality studies.
Results: In total, 9,550 of 14,384 were non-duplicative articles and 25 met inclusion criteria. Comparative modalities were EEG 7, surgical outcome 6, intracranial EEG 5, anatomical MRI 4, EEG-fMRI 2, and magnetoencephalography 1. Independent component analysis 9 and seed-based analysis 8 were top rs-fMRI methods. Study-level odds ratio heterogeneity in both the fixed- and random-effects analysis was significant (p < 0.001). Marked cross-modality and same-modality systematic differences in agreement between rs-fMRI and the comparator were present (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002), respectively, with surgical outcomes having higher agreement than EEG (p = 0.002) and iEEG (p = 0.007). The estimated population mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 and 0.09, with predicted values across studies ranging from 0.44 to 0.96 and 0.02 to 0.67, respectively.
Significance: We evaluated centrality and heterogeneity in SOZ agreement between rs-fMRI and comparative modalities using a wider variety of rs-fMRI analyzing subtypes and comparative modalities, compared to prior. Strong evidence for between-study differences in the agreement odds ratio was shown by both the fixed- and the random-effects analyses, attributed to rs-fMRI analysis variability. Agreement with rs-fMRI differed by modality type, with surgical outcomes having higher agreement than EEG and iEEG. Overall, sensitivity was high, but specificity was low, which may be attributed in part to differences between other modalities.