打开潘多拉盒子:自我相关的负面社会信息的神经加工。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Biological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108982
Stella Nicolaou, Daniel Vega, Josep Marco-Pallarés
{"title":"打开潘多拉盒子:自我相关的负面社会信息的神经加工。","authors":"Stella Nicolaou, Daniel Vega, Josep Marco-Pallarés","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Curiosity is a powerful motivator of information-seeking behavior. People seek not only positive, but also aversive social information about others. However, whether people also seek unfavorable social information about themselves, as well as the neural mechanisms that may drive such seemingly counterintuitive behavior remain unclear. To address this gap, we developed a novel electroencephalography-compatible Social Incentive Delay (SID) task, which was implemented in 30 healthy young adults as they responded as fast as possible to a target to receive positive or avoid negative comments about their own or about others' Instagram photos. Reaction times were slower for negative vs positive comments' conditions, but only for participants' own photos, revealing less motivation to avoid negative rather than seek positive self-relevant social feedback. Coherently, receiving negative feedback, as opposed to avoiding it, evoked larger amplitudes in the Reward Positivity (RewP) and FB-P3 time-range, especially for participants' own photos, indicating that receiving a negative comment was more rewarding and more salient than not receiving any comment at all. Our findings challenge prior evidence suggesting that humans instinctively avoid aversive stimuli, and they shed light on the neurophysiological mechanisms that may underlie this counterintuitive behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"108982"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opening the Pandora box: Neural processing of self-relevant negative social information.\",\"authors\":\"Stella Nicolaou, Daniel Vega, Josep Marco-Pallarés\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Curiosity is a powerful motivator of information-seeking behavior. People seek not only positive, but also aversive social information about others. However, whether people also seek unfavorable social information about themselves, as well as the neural mechanisms that may drive such seemingly counterintuitive behavior remain unclear. To address this gap, we developed a novel electroencephalography-compatible Social Incentive Delay (SID) task, which was implemented in 30 healthy young adults as they responded as fast as possible to a target to receive positive or avoid negative comments about their own or about others' Instagram photos. Reaction times were slower for negative vs positive comments' conditions, but only for participants' own photos, revealing less motivation to avoid negative rather than seek positive self-relevant social feedback. Coherently, receiving negative feedback, as opposed to avoiding it, evoked larger amplitudes in the Reward Positivity (RewP) and FB-P3 time-range, especially for participants' own photos, indicating that receiving a negative comment was more rewarding and more salient than not receiving any comment at all. Our findings challenge prior evidence suggesting that humans instinctively avoid aversive stimuli, and they shed light on the neurophysiological mechanisms that may underlie this counterintuitive behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108982\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108982\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

好奇心是信息寻求行为的强大动力。人们不仅会寻找有关他人的正面信息,也会寻找有关他人的负面信息。然而,人们是否也在寻找关于自己的不利社会信息,以及可能驱动这种看似违反直觉的行为的神经机制仍不清楚。为了解决这一差距,我们开发了一种新的脑电图兼容的社会激励延迟(SID)任务,该任务在30名健康的年轻人中实施,他们尽可能快地对目标做出反应,以获得对自己或他人Instagram照片的正面或避免负面评论。负面评论条件下的反应时间比正面评论条件下的反应时间要慢,但仅限于参与者自己的照片,这表明他们避免负面评论的动机更少,而不是寻求积极的与自我相关的社会反馈。一致地,接受负面反馈,而不是避免负面反馈,在奖励积极性(RewP)和FB-P3时间范围内引起了更大的振幅,特别是对于参与者自己的照片,这表明收到负面评论比没有收到任何评论更有回报,也更突出。我们的发现挑战了先前的证据,即人类本能地避免厌恶的刺激,他们揭示了这种反直觉行为背后的神经生理机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Opening the Pandora box: Neural processing of self-relevant negative social information.

Curiosity is a powerful motivator of information-seeking behavior. People seek not only positive, but also aversive social information about others. However, whether people also seek unfavorable social information about themselves, as well as the neural mechanisms that may drive such seemingly counterintuitive behavior remain unclear. To address this gap, we developed a novel electroencephalography-compatible Social Incentive Delay (SID) task, which was implemented in 30 healthy young adults as they responded as fast as possible to a target to receive positive or avoid negative comments about their own or about others' Instagram photos. Reaction times were slower for negative vs positive comments' conditions, but only for participants' own photos, revealing less motivation to avoid negative rather than seek positive self-relevant social feedback. Coherently, receiving negative feedback, as opposed to avoiding it, evoked larger amplitudes in the Reward Positivity (RewP) and FB-P3 time-range, especially for participants' own photos, indicating that receiving a negative comment was more rewarding and more salient than not receiving any comment at all. Our findings challenge prior evidence suggesting that humans instinctively avoid aversive stimuli, and they shed light on the neurophysiological mechanisms that may underlie this counterintuitive behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
期刊最新文献
Physiological responses to aversive and non-aversive audiovisual, auditory, and visual stimuli. Using N2pc variability to probe functionality: Linear mixed modelling of trial EEG and behaviour. Beyond facilitating unisensory processing: Crossmodal associative memory training further modulates sensory integration. Under pressure in the Eriksen flanker task. Loneliness is associated with diminished heart rate variability reactivity to acute social stress in younger adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1