基因水平分析揭示了精神分裂症的遗传病因和治疗靶点

IF 21.4 1区 心理学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Nature Human Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1038/s41562-024-02091-4
Xinglun Dang, Zhaowei Teng, Yongfeng Yang, Wenqiang Li, Jiewei Liu, Li Hui, Dongsheng Zhou, Daohua Gong, Shan-Shan Dai, Yifan Li, Xingxing Li, Luxian Lv, Yong Zeng, Yonggui Yuan, Xiancang Ma, Zhongchun Liu, Tao Li, Xiong-Jian Luo
{"title":"基因水平分析揭示了精神分裂症的遗传病因和治疗靶点","authors":"Xinglun Dang, Zhaowei Teng, Yongfeng Yang, Wenqiang Li, Jiewei Liu, Li Hui, Dongsheng Zhou, Daohua Gong, Shan-Shan Dai, Yifan Li, Xingxing Li, Luxian Lv, Yong Zeng, Yonggui Yuan, Xiancang Ma, Zhongchun Liu, Tao Li, Xiong-Jian Luo","doi":"10.1038/s41562-024-02091-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have reported multiple risk loci for schizophrenia (SCZ). However, the majority of the associations were from populations of European ancestry. Here we conducted a large-scale GWAS in Eastern Asian populations (29,519 cases and 44,392 controls) and identified ten Eastern Asian-specific risk loci, two of which have not been previously reported. A further cross-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis (96,806 cases and 492,818 controls) including populations from diverse ancestries identified 61 previously unreported risk loci. Systematic variant-level analysis, including fine mapping, functional genomics and expression quantitative trait loci, prioritized potential causal variants. Gene-level analyses, including transcriptome-wide association study, proteome-wide association study and Mendelian randomization, nominated the potential causal genes. By integrating evidence from layers of different analyses, we prioritized the most plausible causal genes for SCZ, such as <i>ACE</i>, <i>CNNM2</i>, <i>SNAP91</i>, <i>ABCB9</i> and <i>GATAD2A</i>. Finally, drug repurposing showed that ACE, CA14, MAPK3 and MAPT are potential therapeutic targets for SCZ. Our study not only showed the power of cross-ancestry GWAS in deciphering the genetic aetiology of SCZ, but also uncovered new genetic risk loci, potential causal variants and genes and therapeutic targets for SCZ.</p>","PeriodicalId":19074,"journal":{"name":"Nature Human Behaviour","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gene-level analysis reveals the genetic aetiology and therapeutic targets of schizophrenia\",\"authors\":\"Xinglun Dang, Zhaowei Teng, Yongfeng Yang, Wenqiang Li, Jiewei Liu, Li Hui, Dongsheng Zhou, Daohua Gong, Shan-Shan Dai, Yifan Li, Xingxing Li, Luxian Lv, Yong Zeng, Yonggui Yuan, Xiancang Ma, Zhongchun Liu, Tao Li, Xiong-Jian Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41562-024-02091-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have reported multiple risk loci for schizophrenia (SCZ). However, the majority of the associations were from populations of European ancestry. Here we conducted a large-scale GWAS in Eastern Asian populations (29,519 cases and 44,392 controls) and identified ten Eastern Asian-specific risk loci, two of which have not been previously reported. A further cross-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis (96,806 cases and 492,818 controls) including populations from diverse ancestries identified 61 previously unreported risk loci. Systematic variant-level analysis, including fine mapping, functional genomics and expression quantitative trait loci, prioritized potential causal variants. Gene-level analyses, including transcriptome-wide association study, proteome-wide association study and Mendelian randomization, nominated the potential causal genes. By integrating evidence from layers of different analyses, we prioritized the most plausible causal genes for SCZ, such as <i>ACE</i>, <i>CNNM2</i>, <i>SNAP91</i>, <i>ABCB9</i> and <i>GATAD2A</i>. Finally, drug repurposing showed that ACE, CA14, MAPK3 and MAPT are potential therapeutic targets for SCZ. Our study not only showed the power of cross-ancestry GWAS in deciphering the genetic aetiology of SCZ, but also uncovered new genetic risk loci, potential causal variants and genes and therapeutic targets for SCZ.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Human Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Human Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02091-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Human Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02091-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全基因组关联研究(GWASs)已经报道了精神分裂症(SCZ)的多个危险位点。然而,大多数关联来自欧洲血统的人群。在此,我们对东亚人群(29,519例和44,392例对照)进行了大规模的GWAS,并确定了10个东亚特有的风险位点,其中两个以前没有报道过。进一步的跨祖先GWAS荟萃分析(96,806例和492,818例对照)包括来自不同祖先的人群,确定了61个以前未报告的风险位点。系统的变异水平分析,包括精细定位、功能基因组学和表达数量性状位点,优先考虑潜在的因果变异。基因水平分析,包括转录组全关联研究、蛋白质组全关联研究和孟德尔随机化,提名了潜在的致病基因。通过整合来自不同分析层的证据,我们优先考虑了SCZ最可能的致病基因,如ACE、CNNM2、SNAP91、ABCB9和GATAD2A。最后,药物再利用表明ACE、CA14、MAPK3和MAPT是SCZ的潜在治疗靶点。我们的研究不仅显示了跨祖先GWAS在破译SCZ遗传病因学方面的能力,而且还揭示了SCZ新的遗传风险位点、潜在的因果变异以及基因和治疗靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gene-level analysis reveals the genetic aetiology and therapeutic targets of schizophrenia

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have reported multiple risk loci for schizophrenia (SCZ). However, the majority of the associations were from populations of European ancestry. Here we conducted a large-scale GWAS in Eastern Asian populations (29,519 cases and 44,392 controls) and identified ten Eastern Asian-specific risk loci, two of which have not been previously reported. A further cross-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis (96,806 cases and 492,818 controls) including populations from diverse ancestries identified 61 previously unreported risk loci. Systematic variant-level analysis, including fine mapping, functional genomics and expression quantitative trait loci, prioritized potential causal variants. Gene-level analyses, including transcriptome-wide association study, proteome-wide association study and Mendelian randomization, nominated the potential causal genes. By integrating evidence from layers of different analyses, we prioritized the most plausible causal genes for SCZ, such as ACE, CNNM2, SNAP91, ABCB9 and GATAD2A. Finally, drug repurposing showed that ACE, CA14, MAPK3 and MAPT are potential therapeutic targets for SCZ. Our study not only showed the power of cross-ancestry GWAS in deciphering the genetic aetiology of SCZ, but also uncovered new genetic risk loci, potential causal variants and genes and therapeutic targets for SCZ.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Human Behaviour
Nature Human Behaviour Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
36.80
自引率
1.00%
发文量
227
期刊介绍: Nature Human Behaviour is a journal that focuses on publishing research of outstanding significance into any aspect of human behavior.The research can cover various areas such as psychological, biological, and social bases of human behavior.It also includes the study of origins, development, and disorders related to human behavior.The primary aim of the journal is to increase the visibility of research in the field and enhance its societal reach and impact.
期刊最新文献
Combating China’s retraction crisis First farmers of Central Europe do not show family-related inequality Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries Healthcare use in 12–18-year-old adolescents vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 versus unvaccinated in a national register-based Danish cohort Do not blame ‘queen bees’ for gender inequality in academia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1