Mark Borthwick, Bethan Jenkins, Paul E Wischmeyer, Jeffrey F Barletta
{"title":"肠内营养是否能预防危重病人的应激性溃疡?","authors":"Mark Borthwick, Bethan Jenkins, Paul E Wischmeyer, Jeffrey F Barletta","doi":"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Critically ill patients are at risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) due to stress ulceration. Strategies to reduce the risk include administration of prophylactic ulcer healing medications. Enteral nutrition (EN) may be favourably associated with GIB risks. This manuscript summarizes available evidence regarding EN effects on GIB.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There are few data available to directly compare the effect of EN on GIB. Direct comparison in animal models generally indicate a beneficial effect. Human data provide indirect evidence from pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis studies. EN exposure has been randomized in nutrition trials of critically ill patients, but GIB outcomes were not recorded. Detailed EN exposure data were recorded in two large pharmacological stress ulcer trials. One finds EN is associated with lower GIB, lower mortality, and increased pneumonia, and notes a possible interaction between EN and pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis. The second has yet to report associations with EN.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>EN may reduce the risk of GIB, although robust direct evidence is absent. Potential interactions between EN and pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis require further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10962,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does enteral nutrition protect against stress ulceration in the critically ill?\",\"authors\":\"Mark Borthwick, Bethan Jenkins, Paul E Wischmeyer, Jeffrey F Barletta\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Critically ill patients are at risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) due to stress ulceration. Strategies to reduce the risk include administration of prophylactic ulcer healing medications. Enteral nutrition (EN) may be favourably associated with GIB risks. This manuscript summarizes available evidence regarding EN effects on GIB.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There are few data available to directly compare the effect of EN on GIB. Direct comparison in animal models generally indicate a beneficial effect. Human data provide indirect evidence from pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis studies. EN exposure has been randomized in nutrition trials of critically ill patients, but GIB outcomes were not recorded. Detailed EN exposure data were recorded in two large pharmacological stress ulcer trials. One finds EN is associated with lower GIB, lower mortality, and increased pneumonia, and notes a possible interaction between EN and pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis. The second has yet to report associations with EN.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>EN may reduce the risk of GIB, although robust direct evidence is absent. Potential interactions between EN and pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis require further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001097\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
审查目的:危重病人因应激性溃疡而面临胃肠道出血(GIB)的风险。降低风险的策略包括使用预防性溃疡愈合药物。肠内营养(EN)可能与胃肠道出血风险有良好的关联。本手稿总结了有关肠内营养对 GIB 影响的现有证据:直接比较肠内营养对 GIB 影响的数据很少。在动物模型中进行的直接比较通常显示出有益的效果。人类数据提供了药物应激性溃疡预防研究的间接证据。在危重病人的营养试验中,EN 的暴露量是随机的,但没有记录 GIB 的结果。两项大型应激性溃疡药物试验记录了详细的EN暴露数据。其中一项发现 EN 与较低的 GIB、较低的死亡率和较高的肺炎有关,并指出 EN 与药物性应激性溃疡预防之间可能存在相互作用。总结:尽管缺乏有力的直接证据,但EN可能会降低GIB的风险。EN 与药物性应激性溃疡预防之间可能存在的相互作用需要进一步研究。
Does enteral nutrition protect against stress ulceration in the critically ill?
Purpose of review: Critically ill patients are at risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) due to stress ulceration. Strategies to reduce the risk include administration of prophylactic ulcer healing medications. Enteral nutrition (EN) may be favourably associated with GIB risks. This manuscript summarizes available evidence regarding EN effects on GIB.
Recent findings: There are few data available to directly compare the effect of EN on GIB. Direct comparison in animal models generally indicate a beneficial effect. Human data provide indirect evidence from pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis studies. EN exposure has been randomized in nutrition trials of critically ill patients, but GIB outcomes were not recorded. Detailed EN exposure data were recorded in two large pharmacological stress ulcer trials. One finds EN is associated with lower GIB, lower mortality, and increased pneumonia, and notes a possible interaction between EN and pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis. The second has yet to report associations with EN.
Summary: EN may reduce the risk of GIB, although robust direct evidence is absent. Potential interactions between EN and pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis require further study.
期刊介绍:
A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of clinical nutrition and metabolic care. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include protein, amino acid metabolism and therapy, lipid metabolism and therapy, nutrition and the intensive care unit and carbohydrates. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.