人类疾病的多基因风险评分。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1093/clinchem/hvae190
Dimitri J Maamari, Roukoz Abou-Karam, Akl C Fahed
{"title":"人类疾病的多基因风险评分。","authors":"Dimitri J Maamari, Roukoz Abou-Karam, Akl C Fahed","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are measures of genetic susceptibility to human health traits. With the advent of large data repositories combining genetic data and phenotypic information, PRS are providing valuable insights into the genetic architecture of complex diseases and are transforming the landscape of precision medicine.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>PRS have emerged as tools with clinical utility in human disease. Herein, details on how to develop PRS are provided, followed by 5 areas in which they can be used to improve human health: (a) augmenting risk prediction, (b) refining diagnosis, (c) guiding treatment choices, (d) making clinical trials more efficient, and (e) improving public health. Finally, some of the ongoing challenges to the clinical implementation of PRS are noted.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>PRS can offer valuable information for providers and patients, including identifying risk of disease earlier in life and before the onset of clinical risk factors, guiding treatment decisions, improving public health outcomes, and making clinical trials more efficient. The future of genomic-informed risk assessments of disease is through integrated risk models that combine genetic factors including PRS, monogenic, and somatic DNA information with nongenetic risk factors such as clinical risk estimators and multiomic data. However, adopting PRS in a clinical setting at scale faces some challenges, including cross-ancestry performance, standardization and calibration of risk models, downstream clinical decision-making from risk information, and seamless integration into existing health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"71 1","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polygenic Risk Scores in Human Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Dimitri J Maamari, Roukoz Abou-Karam, Akl C Fahed\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvae190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are measures of genetic susceptibility to human health traits. With the advent of large data repositories combining genetic data and phenotypic information, PRS are providing valuable insights into the genetic architecture of complex diseases and are transforming the landscape of precision medicine.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>PRS have emerged as tools with clinical utility in human disease. Herein, details on how to develop PRS are provided, followed by 5 areas in which they can be used to improve human health: (a) augmenting risk prediction, (b) refining diagnosis, (c) guiding treatment choices, (d) making clinical trials more efficient, and (e) improving public health. Finally, some of the ongoing challenges to the clinical implementation of PRS are noted.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>PRS can offer valuable information for providers and patients, including identifying risk of disease earlier in life and before the onset of clinical risk factors, guiding treatment decisions, improving public health outcomes, and making clinical trials more efficient. The future of genomic-informed risk assessments of disease is through integrated risk models that combine genetic factors including PRS, monogenic, and somatic DNA information with nongenetic risk factors such as clinical risk estimators and multiomic data. However, adopting PRS in a clinical setting at scale faces some challenges, including cross-ancestry performance, standardization and calibration of risk models, downstream clinical decision-making from risk information, and seamless integration into existing health systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"69-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae190\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多基因风险评分(PRS)是衡量人类健康性状遗传易感性的指标。随着结合遗传数据和表型信息的大型数据存储库的出现,PRS正在为复杂疾病的遗传结构提供有价值的见解,并正在改变精准医学的格局。PRS已成为人类疾病临床应用的工具。本文详细介绍了如何发展PRS,然后介绍了它们可用于改善人类健康的5个领域:(a)增强风险预测,(b)改进诊断,(c)指导治疗选择,(d)提高临床试验效率,以及(e)改善公共卫生。最后,指出了临床实施PRS的一些持续挑战。摘要:PRS可以为提供者和患者提供有价值的信息,包括在生命早期和临床风险因素发生之前识别疾病风险,指导治疗决策,改善公共卫生结果,并使临床试验更有效。基于基因组的疾病风险评估的未来是通过综合风险模型,将遗传因素(包括PRS、单基因和体细胞DNA信息)与非遗传风险因素(如临床风险估计值和多组数据)结合起来。然而,在临床环境中大规模采用PRS面临着一些挑战,包括跨祖先绩效、风险模型的标准化和校准、基于风险信息的下游临床决策以及与现有卫生系统的无缝集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polygenic Risk Scores in Human Disease.

Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are measures of genetic susceptibility to human health traits. With the advent of large data repositories combining genetic data and phenotypic information, PRS are providing valuable insights into the genetic architecture of complex diseases and are transforming the landscape of precision medicine.

Content: PRS have emerged as tools with clinical utility in human disease. Herein, details on how to develop PRS are provided, followed by 5 areas in which they can be used to improve human health: (a) augmenting risk prediction, (b) refining diagnosis, (c) guiding treatment choices, (d) making clinical trials more efficient, and (e) improving public health. Finally, some of the ongoing challenges to the clinical implementation of PRS are noted.

Summary: PRS can offer valuable information for providers and patients, including identifying risk of disease earlier in life and before the onset of clinical risk factors, guiding treatment decisions, improving public health outcomes, and making clinical trials more efficient. The future of genomic-informed risk assessments of disease is through integrated risk models that combine genetic factors including PRS, monogenic, and somatic DNA information with nongenetic risk factors such as clinical risk estimators and multiomic data. However, adopting PRS in a clinical setting at scale faces some challenges, including cross-ancestry performance, standardization and calibration of risk models, downstream clinical decision-making from risk information, and seamless integration into existing health systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Reflecting on 70 Years of Clinical Chemistry. Robust Diagnosis of Acute Bacterial and Viral Infections via Host Gene Expression Rank-Based Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithm: A Multi-Cohort Model Development and Validation Study. How Can Digital PCR Support the Rapid Development of New Detection Tests in Future Pandemics? A Multianalyte Machine Learning Model to Detect Wrong Blood in Complete Blood Count Tube Errors in a Pediatric Setting Structural Variation Interpretation in the Genome Sequencing Era: Lessons from Cytogenetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1