左束支起搏与双心室起搏对心力衰竭和完全性左束支阻滞患者的长期临床比较研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart and Vessels Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s00380-024-02512-4
Jinhui Zhuo, Canghao Chen, Junhua Lin, Jing Wang, Fayuan Fu
{"title":"左束支起搏与双心室起搏对心力衰竭和完全性左束支阻滞患者的长期临床比较研究。","authors":"Jinhui Zhuo, Canghao Chen, Junhua Lin, Jing Wang, Fayuan Fu","doi":"10.1007/s00380-024-02512-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is an emerging physiological pacing technique characterized by stable pacing parameters and a narrower QRS duration. This study aims to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of biventricular pacing (BIVP) and LBBP in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 35 patients with chronic HFrEF accompanied by CLBBB treated at our center from April 2018 to October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: the LBBP group and the BIVP group. Postoperative follow-up data were collected, including pacing parameters, QRS duration, echocardiographic indices (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), mitral and tricuspid regurgitation), NT-proBNP levels, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. n addition, postoperative complications, heart failure readmission rates, and mortality rates were observed. 35 patients were recruited, 18 for LBBP and 17 for BIVP. The LBBP group demonstrated significantly lower pacing thresholds and impedance at 12 months post-surgery compared to the BIVP group (p < 0.05). The QRS duration in the LBBP group was significantly narrower than that in the BIVP group at 6, 12, and 24 months (p < 0.05). At 24 months post-surgery, LVEDD and LVESD were significantly lower in the LBBP group than those in the BIVP group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between groups in response rates, tricuspid and mitral regurgitation, NYHA class, NT-proBNP levels, all-cause mortality, or heart failure rehospitalization rates (p > 0.05). LBBP may be a relatively safe and effective resynchronization therapy, serving as a complementary approach to BIVP for patients with HFrEF and CLBBB.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A long-term clinical comparative study of left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.\",\"authors\":\"Jinhui Zhuo, Canghao Chen, Junhua Lin, Jing Wang, Fayuan Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00380-024-02512-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is an emerging physiological pacing technique characterized by stable pacing parameters and a narrower QRS duration. This study aims to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of biventricular pacing (BIVP) and LBBP in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 35 patients with chronic HFrEF accompanied by CLBBB treated at our center from April 2018 to October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: the LBBP group and the BIVP group. Postoperative follow-up data were collected, including pacing parameters, QRS duration, echocardiographic indices (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), mitral and tricuspid regurgitation), NT-proBNP levels, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. n addition, postoperative complications, heart failure readmission rates, and mortality rates were observed. 35 patients were recruited, 18 for LBBP and 17 for BIVP. The LBBP group demonstrated significantly lower pacing thresholds and impedance at 12 months post-surgery compared to the BIVP group (p < 0.05). The QRS duration in the LBBP group was significantly narrower than that in the BIVP group at 6, 12, and 24 months (p < 0.05). At 24 months post-surgery, LVEDD and LVESD were significantly lower in the LBBP group than those in the BIVP group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between groups in response rates, tricuspid and mitral regurgitation, NYHA class, NT-proBNP levels, all-cause mortality, or heart failure rehospitalization rates (p > 0.05). LBBP may be a relatively safe and effective resynchronization therapy, serving as a complementary approach to BIVP for patients with HFrEF and CLBBB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02512-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02512-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

左束支起搏(LBBP)是一种新兴的生理起搏技术,其特点是起搏参数稳定,QRS持续时间较短。本研究旨在比较双心室起搏(BIVP)和LBBP治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)和完全性左束支传导阻滞(CLBBB)患者的长期疗效和安全性。回顾性分析2018年4月至2022年10月在我中心治疗的35例慢性HFrEF合并CLBBB患者。根据手术技术将患者分为两组:LBBP组和BIVP组。收集术后随访资料,包括起搏参数、QRS持续时间、超声心动图指标(左室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左室收缩末期内径(LVESD)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、二尖瓣和三尖瓣反流)、NT-proBNP水平、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级。此外,观察术后并发症、心力衰竭再入院率和死亡率。共招募35例患者,18例为LBBP, 17例为BIVP。与BIVP组相比,LBBP组术后12个月的起搏阈值和阻抗显著降低(p 0.05)。LBBP可能是一种相对安全有效的再同步治疗,可作为HFrEF和CLBBB患者BIVP的补充方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A long-term clinical comparative study of left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is an emerging physiological pacing technique characterized by stable pacing parameters and a narrower QRS duration. This study aims to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of biventricular pacing (BIVP) and LBBP in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 35 patients with chronic HFrEF accompanied by CLBBB treated at our center from April 2018 to October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: the LBBP group and the BIVP group. Postoperative follow-up data were collected, including pacing parameters, QRS duration, echocardiographic indices (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), mitral and tricuspid regurgitation), NT-proBNP levels, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. n addition, postoperative complications, heart failure readmission rates, and mortality rates were observed. 35 patients were recruited, 18 for LBBP and 17 for BIVP. The LBBP group demonstrated significantly lower pacing thresholds and impedance at 12 months post-surgery compared to the BIVP group (p < 0.05). The QRS duration in the LBBP group was significantly narrower than that in the BIVP group at 6, 12, and 24 months (p < 0.05). At 24 months post-surgery, LVEDD and LVESD were significantly lower in the LBBP group than those in the BIVP group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between groups in response rates, tricuspid and mitral regurgitation, NYHA class, NT-proBNP levels, all-cause mortality, or heart failure rehospitalization rates (p > 0.05). LBBP may be a relatively safe and effective resynchronization therapy, serving as a complementary approach to BIVP for patients with HFrEF and CLBBB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Perioperative management of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: a comparison of Impella with intra-aortic balloon pump. How to demonstrate feasibility and efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients. Timing of acute decompensated heart failure in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection fraction. A long-term clinical comparative study of left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block. Pd/Pa fluctuation with continuous ATP administration indicates inaccurate FFR measurement caused by insufficient hyperemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1