神经性疼痛管理的新兴治疗方式和药物治疗:平行随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2024-12-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/6782574
Ernest Kissi Kontor, Catherine Wellan, Hafiz Mohammad Maaz, Daha Garba Muhammad, Almonzer Al-Qiami, Amin Sharifan, Jessica Kumah, Hester Lacey, Abdelmonem Siddiq, Nityanand Jain
{"title":"神经性疼痛管理的新兴治疗方式和药物治疗:平行随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ernest Kissi Kontor, Catherine Wellan, Hafiz Mohammad Maaz, Daha Garba Muhammad, Almonzer Al-Qiami, Amin Sharifan, Jessica Kumah, Hester Lacey, Abdelmonem Siddiq, Nityanand Jain","doi":"10.1155/prm/6782574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Neuropathic pain (NP) is a chronic condition caused by abnormal neuronal excitability in the nervous system. Current treatments for NP are often ineffective or poorly tolerated. Hence, we reviewed the efficacy and safety of novel drugs or devices that target neuronal excitability in NP patients compared with placebo, sham, or usual care interventions. <b>Methods:</b> Six databases were searched for parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting novel devices (rTMS, SCS, and TENS) or drugs (EMA401, capsaicin 8% patch, and Sativex) for NP. Data were extracted and quality was assessed using the ROB2 tool. The random-effects inverse variance method was used for analysis. <b>Results:</b> In our review of 30 RCTs with 4251 participants, device-based interventions were found to be more effective in reducing pain scores than control interventions (SMD = -1.27, 95% CI: -1.92 to -0.62). However, high heterogeneity was seen (<i>p</i> < 0.01, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 91%), attributable to the etiology of NP (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 58.84%) and year of publication (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 49.49%). Funding source and type of control comparator were ruled out as cause of heterogeneity. Although drug interventions did not differ from placebo interventions in absolute pain reduction (SMD = -1.21, 95% CI: -3.55 to 1.13), when comparing relative change in pain intensity from baseline, drug interventions were found to be effective (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.04-0.55). Asymmetry in the funnel plot was visualized, suggesting publication bias. Certainty of evidence was very low according to GRADE assessment. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our review indicates that device-based interventions are more effective than control interventions in reducing pain intensity in NP. Nevertheless, available evidence is limited due to heterogeneity and publication bias, prompting the need for more high-quality RCTs to confirm the efficacy and safety of these interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6782574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging Therapeutic Modalities and Pharmacotherapies in Neuropathic Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Parallel Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Ernest Kissi Kontor, Catherine Wellan, Hafiz Mohammad Maaz, Daha Garba Muhammad, Almonzer Al-Qiami, Amin Sharifan, Jessica Kumah, Hester Lacey, Abdelmonem Siddiq, Nityanand Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/prm/6782574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Neuropathic pain (NP) is a chronic condition caused by abnormal neuronal excitability in the nervous system. Current treatments for NP are often ineffective or poorly tolerated. Hence, we reviewed the efficacy and safety of novel drugs or devices that target neuronal excitability in NP patients compared with placebo, sham, or usual care interventions. <b>Methods:</b> Six databases were searched for parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting novel devices (rTMS, SCS, and TENS) or drugs (EMA401, capsaicin 8% patch, and Sativex) for NP. Data were extracted and quality was assessed using the ROB2 tool. The random-effects inverse variance method was used for analysis. <b>Results:</b> In our review of 30 RCTs with 4251 participants, device-based interventions were found to be more effective in reducing pain scores than control interventions (SMD = -1.27, 95% CI: -1.92 to -0.62). However, high heterogeneity was seen (<i>p</i> < 0.01, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 91%), attributable to the etiology of NP (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 58.84%) and year of publication (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 49.49%). Funding source and type of control comparator were ruled out as cause of heterogeneity. Although drug interventions did not differ from placebo interventions in absolute pain reduction (SMD = -1.21, 95% CI: -3.55 to 1.13), when comparing relative change in pain intensity from baseline, drug interventions were found to be effective (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.04-0.55). Asymmetry in the funnel plot was visualized, suggesting publication bias. Certainty of evidence was very low according to GRADE assessment. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our review indicates that device-based interventions are more effective than control interventions in reducing pain intensity in NP. Nevertheless, available evidence is limited due to heterogeneity and publication bias, prompting the need for more high-quality RCTs to confirm the efficacy and safety of these interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"6782574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695085/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/6782574\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/6782574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经性疼痛是一种由神经系统神经元兴奋性异常引起的慢性疾病。目前对NP的治疗通常无效或耐受性差。因此,我们回顾了针对NP患者神经元兴奋性的新型药物或设备与安慰剂、假药或常规护理干预措施的有效性和安全性。方法:检索6个数据库,检索报告NP治疗新设备(rTMS、SCS和TENS)或药物(EMA401、8%辣椒素贴剂和Sativex)的平行随机对照试验(rct)。使用ROB2工具提取数据并评估质量。采用随机效应反方差法进行分析。结果:在我们对4251名参与者的30项随机对照试验的回顾中,发现基于器械的干预在降低疼痛评分方面比对照干预更有效(SMD = -1.27, 95% CI: -1.92至-0.62)。然而,由于NP的病因学(r2 = 58.84%)和发表年份(r2 = 49.49%),研究结果存在高度异质性(p < 0.01, r2 = 91%)。资金来源和对照比较国的类型被排除为异质性的原因。虽然药物干预与安慰剂干预在绝对疼痛减轻方面没有差异(SMD = -1.21, 95% CI: -3.55至1.13),但当比较疼痛强度与基线的相对变化时,发现药物干预是有效的(SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.04-0.55)。漏斗图中的不对称可见,提示发表偏倚。根据GRADE评估,证据的确定性非常低。结论:我们的综述表明,在减轻NP患者疼痛强度方面,基于器械的干预比对照干预更有效。然而,由于异质性和发表偏倚,现有证据有限,因此需要更多高质量的随机对照试验来证实这些干预措施的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emerging Therapeutic Modalities and Pharmacotherapies in Neuropathic Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Parallel Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Neuropathic pain (NP) is a chronic condition caused by abnormal neuronal excitability in the nervous system. Current treatments for NP are often ineffective or poorly tolerated. Hence, we reviewed the efficacy and safety of novel drugs or devices that target neuronal excitability in NP patients compared with placebo, sham, or usual care interventions. Methods: Six databases were searched for parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting novel devices (rTMS, SCS, and TENS) or drugs (EMA401, capsaicin 8% patch, and Sativex) for NP. Data were extracted and quality was assessed using the ROB2 tool. The random-effects inverse variance method was used for analysis. Results: In our review of 30 RCTs with 4251 participants, device-based interventions were found to be more effective in reducing pain scores than control interventions (SMD = -1.27, 95% CI: -1.92 to -0.62). However, high heterogeneity was seen (p < 0.01, I 2 = 91%), attributable to the etiology of NP (R 2 = 58.84%) and year of publication (R 2 = 49.49%). Funding source and type of control comparator were ruled out as cause of heterogeneity. Although drug interventions did not differ from placebo interventions in absolute pain reduction (SMD = -1.21, 95% CI: -3.55 to 1.13), when comparing relative change in pain intensity from baseline, drug interventions were found to be effective (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.04-0.55). Asymmetry in the funnel plot was visualized, suggesting publication bias. Certainty of evidence was very low according to GRADE assessment. Conclusions: Our review indicates that device-based interventions are more effective than control interventions in reducing pain intensity in NP. Nevertheless, available evidence is limited due to heterogeneity and publication bias, prompting the need for more high-quality RCTs to confirm the efficacy and safety of these interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
期刊最新文献
The Concept of Pain in Children Attending Primary School: Implications for School-Based Pain Education. Pharmacological Postoperative Pain Management for Paediatric Dental Extractions Under General Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review. Emerging Therapeutic Modalities and Pharmacotherapies in Neuropathic Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Parallel Randomized Controlled Trials. Neuropathic Component Characteristics in Chronic Secondary Musculoskeletal Pain After Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Fractures: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study. Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on the Incidence of Hypoxia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1