Vivek C Pandrangi, Ana V Araujo, Michelle Buncke, Brennan Olson, Matthew Jorizzo, Nasser Said-Al-Naief, Olabisi Sanusi, Jeremy Ciporen, Maisie Shindo, Joshua Schindler, C Alessandra Colaianni, Daniel Clayburgh, Peter Andersen, Paul Flint, Mark K Wax, Mathew Geltzeiler, Ryan J Li
{"title":"虚拟现实和可穿戴设备的术后实施:机遇与挑战。","authors":"Vivek C Pandrangi, Ana V Araujo, Michelle Buncke, Brennan Olson, Matthew Jorizzo, Nasser Said-Al-Naief, Olabisi Sanusi, Jeremy Ciporen, Maisie Shindo, Joshua Schindler, C Alessandra Colaianni, Daniel Clayburgh, Peter Andersen, Paul Flint, Mark K Wax, Mathew Geltzeiler, Ryan J Li","doi":"10.1002/lary.31989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine implementation of virtual reality (VR) and Fitbit wearable activity devices in postoperative recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, 4-arm, randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing inpatient head and neck surgery at a tertiary academic center from November 2021 to July 2022. Patients were randomized to Control, VR, Fitbit, or combined VR + Fitbit groups. Patients in the VR groups were brought VR headsets to use throughout each day, and patients in the Fitbit groups wore Fitbit devices and were encouraged to achieve 2,000 daily steps. The primary outcome was average daily opioid use, measured as milligram morphine equivalents (MME).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 80 patients included. The majority of patients were male (68.8%), and mean age was 58.8 ± 14.4 years. Only the combined VR + Fitbit cohort was associated with reduced average daily opioid use (VR + Fitbit: 8.8 [20.6] MME vs. Control: 26.4 [37.4] MME, p = 0.02). Patients in intervention groups also had higher hospital satisfaction (p = 0.02). VR was utilized 26% of the time it was provided, with mean use time of 23.8 ± 7.8 min. Mean post-VR subjective pain reduction was 1.0 ± 1.3, and there were three mild adverse events of neck or nasal discomfort. Among the Fitbit groups, there were no adverse events and daily step counts ≥2,000 steps were achieved 45% of the time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of VR and wearable activity devices in postoperative recovery appears well tolerated and may facilitate further development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, though there are challenges to maximizing device usage.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>II. Laryngoscope, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Implementation of Virtual Reality and Wearable Devices: Opportunities and Challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Vivek C Pandrangi, Ana V Araujo, Michelle Buncke, Brennan Olson, Matthew Jorizzo, Nasser Said-Al-Naief, Olabisi Sanusi, Jeremy Ciporen, Maisie Shindo, Joshua Schindler, C Alessandra Colaianni, Daniel Clayburgh, Peter Andersen, Paul Flint, Mark K Wax, Mathew Geltzeiler, Ryan J Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.31989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine implementation of virtual reality (VR) and Fitbit wearable activity devices in postoperative recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, 4-arm, randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing inpatient head and neck surgery at a tertiary academic center from November 2021 to July 2022. Patients were randomized to Control, VR, Fitbit, or combined VR + Fitbit groups. Patients in the VR groups were brought VR headsets to use throughout each day, and patients in the Fitbit groups wore Fitbit devices and were encouraged to achieve 2,000 daily steps. The primary outcome was average daily opioid use, measured as milligram morphine equivalents (MME).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 80 patients included. The majority of patients were male (68.8%), and mean age was 58.8 ± 14.4 years. Only the combined VR + Fitbit cohort was associated with reduced average daily opioid use (VR + Fitbit: 8.8 [20.6] MME vs. Control: 26.4 [37.4] MME, p = 0.02). Patients in intervention groups also had higher hospital satisfaction (p = 0.02). VR was utilized 26% of the time it was provided, with mean use time of 23.8 ± 7.8 min. Mean post-VR subjective pain reduction was 1.0 ± 1.3, and there were three mild adverse events of neck or nasal discomfort. Among the Fitbit groups, there were no adverse events and daily step counts ≥2,000 steps were achieved 45% of the time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of VR and wearable activity devices in postoperative recovery appears well tolerated and may facilitate further development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, though there are challenges to maximizing device usage.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>II. Laryngoscope, 2025.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31989\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31989","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Postoperative Implementation of Virtual Reality and Wearable Devices: Opportunities and Challenges.
Objective: To examine implementation of virtual reality (VR) and Fitbit wearable activity devices in postoperative recovery.
Methods: This was a prospective, 4-arm, randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing inpatient head and neck surgery at a tertiary academic center from November 2021 to July 2022. Patients were randomized to Control, VR, Fitbit, or combined VR + Fitbit groups. Patients in the VR groups were brought VR headsets to use throughout each day, and patients in the Fitbit groups wore Fitbit devices and were encouraged to achieve 2,000 daily steps. The primary outcome was average daily opioid use, measured as milligram morphine equivalents (MME).
Results: There were 80 patients included. The majority of patients were male (68.8%), and mean age was 58.8 ± 14.4 years. Only the combined VR + Fitbit cohort was associated with reduced average daily opioid use (VR + Fitbit: 8.8 [20.6] MME vs. Control: 26.4 [37.4] MME, p = 0.02). Patients in intervention groups also had higher hospital satisfaction (p = 0.02). VR was utilized 26% of the time it was provided, with mean use time of 23.8 ± 7.8 min. Mean post-VR subjective pain reduction was 1.0 ± 1.3, and there were three mild adverse events of neck or nasal discomfort. Among the Fitbit groups, there were no adverse events and daily step counts ≥2,000 steps were achieved 45% of the time.
Conclusion: Implementation of VR and wearable activity devices in postoperative recovery appears well tolerated and may facilitate further development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, though there are challenges to maximizing device usage.
期刊介绍:
The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope.
• Broncho-esophagology
• Communicative disorders
• Head and neck surgery
• Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery
• Oncology
• Speech and hearing defects