影响因素:揭示远程医疗保健利用和采用/避免决策的模式和原因。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105781
Ning Yang , Xin Yang
{"title":"影响因素:揭示远程医疗保健利用和采用/避免决策的模式和原因。","authors":"Ning Yang ,&nbsp;Xin Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The rapid expansion of telehealth, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has highlighted gaps in understanding demographic and health factors shaping its use. Exploring reasons behind individuals’ choices regarding telehealth can guide strategies to promote adoption among diverse populations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 5,119 participants in the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey were analyzed. Dependent variables included telehealth usage and reasons for choosing or avoiding it. Independent variables included demographics, general health, and mental health. Associations were examined using multiple logistic regression models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Factors significantly associated with higher odds of telehealth use included education (college graduate: OR = 1.57, 95 % CI [1.19, 2.06]), gender (male: OR = 0.69, 95 % CI [0.55, 0.87]), rural residency (nonmetro: OR = 0.72, 95 % CI [0.53, 0.97]), depression (OR = 2.91, 95 % CI [2.29, 3.71]), age (e.g., 35–49: OR = 1.66, 95 % CI [1.2, 2.29]), and general health status (good: OR = 0.78, 95 % CI [0.61, 1], excellent or very good: OR = 0.74, 95 % CI [0.58, 0.95]). Older individuals preferred telehealth for convenience but inclined to avoid it in favor of in-person visits. Asian and other group were less likely to use telehealth for seeking advice and including others in visits.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Disparities in telehealth utilization were observed across gender, age, education, health status, and urbanization levels. Policymakers should focus on equitable delivery methods, updated regulatory frameworks, and reducing access disparities, especially in underserved communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 105781"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influencing factors: Unveiling patterns and reasons in telehealth care utilization and adoption/avoidance decisions\",\"authors\":\"Ning Yang ,&nbsp;Xin Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The rapid expansion of telehealth, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has highlighted gaps in understanding demographic and health factors shaping its use. Exploring reasons behind individuals’ choices regarding telehealth can guide strategies to promote adoption among diverse populations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 5,119 participants in the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey were analyzed. Dependent variables included telehealth usage and reasons for choosing or avoiding it. Independent variables included demographics, general health, and mental health. Associations were examined using multiple logistic regression models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Factors significantly associated with higher odds of telehealth use included education (college graduate: OR = 1.57, 95 % CI [1.19, 2.06]), gender (male: OR = 0.69, 95 % CI [0.55, 0.87]), rural residency (nonmetro: OR = 0.72, 95 % CI [0.53, 0.97]), depression (OR = 2.91, 95 % CI [2.29, 3.71]), age (e.g., 35–49: OR = 1.66, 95 % CI [1.2, 2.29]), and general health status (good: OR = 0.78, 95 % CI [0.61, 1], excellent or very good: OR = 0.74, 95 % CI [0.58, 0.95]). Older individuals preferred telehealth for convenience but inclined to avoid it in favor of in-person visits. Asian and other group were less likely to use telehealth for seeking advice and including others in visits.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Disparities in telehealth utilization were observed across gender, age, education, health status, and urbanization levels. Policymakers should focus on equitable delivery methods, updated regulatory frameworks, and reducing access disparities, especially in underserved communities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624004441\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624004441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行加速了远程医疗的迅速扩张,突显了在了解影响其使用的人口和健康因素方面的差距。探索个人选择远程医疗背后的原因可以指导促进不同人群采用远程医疗的战略。方法:对参与2022年健康信息全国趋势调查的5119名参与者的数据进行分析。因变量包括远程医疗的使用情况以及选择或避免远程医疗的原因。独立变量包括人口统计、一般健康和心理健康。使用多重逻辑回归模型检验相关性。结果:更高的远程医疗使用的几率显著相关的主要因素包括教育(大学毕业生:或= 1.57,95% CI[1.19, 2.06]),性别(男:或= 0.69,95% CI[0.55, 0.87]),农村居住(nonmetro:或= 0.72,95% CI[0.53, 0.97])、抑郁(OR = 2.91, 95% CI[2.29, 3.71])、年龄(例如,35-49:或= 1.66,95% CI[1.2, 2.29]),和一般健康状况(好:= 0.78,95%可信区间(0.61,1),优秀或良好:= 0.74,95%可信区间[0.58,0.95])。老年人更喜欢远程医疗,因为方便,但倾向于避免它,而倾向于亲自就诊。亚洲和其他群体不太可能使用远程医疗寻求建议,也不太可能邀请其他人来就诊。结论:远程医疗利用在性别、年龄、教育程度、健康状况和城市化水平方面存在差异。政策制定者应将重点放在公平的交付方法、更新的监管框架和减少获取差距上,特别是在服务不足的社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influencing factors: Unveiling patterns and reasons in telehealth care utilization and adoption/avoidance decisions

Background

The rapid expansion of telehealth, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has highlighted gaps in understanding demographic and health factors shaping its use. Exploring reasons behind individuals’ choices regarding telehealth can guide strategies to promote adoption among diverse populations.

Methods

Data from 5,119 participants in the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey were analyzed. Dependent variables included telehealth usage and reasons for choosing or avoiding it. Independent variables included demographics, general health, and mental health. Associations were examined using multiple logistic regression models.

Results

Factors significantly associated with higher odds of telehealth use included education (college graduate: OR = 1.57, 95 % CI [1.19, 2.06]), gender (male: OR = 0.69, 95 % CI [0.55, 0.87]), rural residency (nonmetro: OR = 0.72, 95 % CI [0.53, 0.97]), depression (OR = 2.91, 95 % CI [2.29, 3.71]), age (e.g., 35–49: OR = 1.66, 95 % CI [1.2, 2.29]), and general health status (good: OR = 0.78, 95 % CI [0.61, 1], excellent or very good: OR = 0.74, 95 % CI [0.58, 0.95]). Older individuals preferred telehealth for convenience but inclined to avoid it in favor of in-person visits. Asian and other group were less likely to use telehealth for seeking advice and including others in visits.

Conclusions

Disparities in telehealth utilization were observed across gender, age, education, health status, and urbanization levels. Policymakers should focus on equitable delivery methods, updated regulatory frameworks, and reducing access disparities, especially in underserved communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning for predicting outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review AI-driven triage in emergency departments: A review of benefits, challenges, and future directions Predicting cancer survival at different stages: Insights from fair and explainable machine learning approaches The fading structural prominence of explanations in clinical studies Utilization, challenges, and training needs of digital health technologies: Perspectives from healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1