[卵母细胞和精子捐献者身份释放的愿景和影响:配子捐献者的描述性调查]。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.gofs.2024.12.005
Clémence Cirade, Inès Braham, Jérôme Delotte, Samir Boukaidi, Sarah Dupuis, Adeline Morisot, Valérie Benoit, Nicolas Chevalier
{"title":"[卵母细胞和精子捐献者身份释放的愿景和影响:配子捐献者的描述性调查]。","authors":"Clémence Cirade, Inès Braham, Jérôme Delotte, Samir Boukaidi, Sarah Dupuis, Adeline Morisot, Valérie Benoit, Nicolas Chevalier","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Bioethics Law of August 2nd, 2021 established access to origins for people conceived by gamete donation. Two years after the implementation of this disposition, what is the proportion of former gamete donors informed about access to origins, and what is their position on this matter? What could be the potential repercussions of this new law on them?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective single-center cohort study using questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When former gamete donors were asked about access to origins, only 53% of oocytes donors and 71% of sperm donors were aware of this measure. When participants were asked about the ideal method of donation, it emerged that 41% of female donors and 47% of male donors were in favour of access to their identifying data for the person resulting from the donation. More than half were in favour of access to non-identifying and medical data. If one day someone conceived from their donation requested access to their identifying data, 62% of oocytes donors and 56% of sperm donors would grant it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of our participants expressed the desire to benefit from information on possible descendants resulting from their donation. Among the donors interviewed, only half are informed of the legislation introducing access to origins, now two years after its implementation. These results encourage us to strengthen communication efforts around access to origins.</p>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Visions and repercussions of identity-release in oocyte and sperm donors: Descriptive survey among gamete donors].\",\"authors\":\"Clémence Cirade, Inès Braham, Jérôme Delotte, Samir Boukaidi, Sarah Dupuis, Adeline Morisot, Valérie Benoit, Nicolas Chevalier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gofs.2024.12.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Bioethics Law of August 2nd, 2021 established access to origins for people conceived by gamete donation. Two years after the implementation of this disposition, what is the proportion of former gamete donors informed about access to origins, and what is their position on this matter? What could be the potential repercussions of this new law on them?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective single-center cohort study using questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When former gamete donors were asked about access to origins, only 53% of oocytes donors and 71% of sperm donors were aware of this measure. When participants were asked about the ideal method of donation, it emerged that 41% of female donors and 47% of male donors were in favour of access to their identifying data for the person resulting from the donation. More than half were in favour of access to non-identifying and medical data. If one day someone conceived from their donation requested access to their identifying data, 62% of oocytes donors and 56% of sperm donors would grant it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of our participants expressed the desire to benefit from information on possible descendants resulting from their donation. Among the donors interviewed, only half are informed of the legislation introducing access to origins, now two years after its implementation. These results encourage us to strengthen communication efforts around access to origins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2024.12.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2024.12.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:2021年8月2日的《生物伦理法》确立了通过配子捐赠受孕的人获得来源的途径。在执行这一处置两年后,得知获得来源的前配子捐赠者的比例是多少?他们在这个问题上的立场是什么?这项新法律可能对他们产生什么潜在影响?方法:采用问卷调查的回顾性单中心队列研究结果:当前配子捐赠者被问及获得来源时,只有53%的卵母细胞捐赠者和71%的精子捐赠者知道这一措施。当参与者被问及理想的捐赠方式时,41%的女性捐赠者和47%的男性捐赠者赞成获得捐赠对象的身份信息。一半以上的人赞成获取非身份和医疗数据。如果有一天,从他们的捐赠中受孕的人要求访问他们的身份数据,62%的卵母细胞捐赠者和56%的精子捐赠者会同意。结论:我们的参与者中有很大一部分人表示希望从他们捐赠的可能后代的信息中受益。在接受采访的捐助者中,只有一半的人知道关于获取原产地的立法,现在该立法已经实施两年了。这些结果鼓励我们加强关于获取原产地的沟通工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Visions and repercussions of identity-release in oocyte and sperm donors: Descriptive survey among gamete donors].

Objectives: The Bioethics Law of August 2nd, 2021 established access to origins for people conceived by gamete donation. Two years after the implementation of this disposition, what is the proportion of former gamete donors informed about access to origins, and what is their position on this matter? What could be the potential repercussions of this new law on them?

Methods: Retrospective single-center cohort study using questionnaires.

Results: When former gamete donors were asked about access to origins, only 53% of oocytes donors and 71% of sperm donors were aware of this measure. When participants were asked about the ideal method of donation, it emerged that 41% of female donors and 47% of male donors were in favour of access to their identifying data for the person resulting from the donation. More than half were in favour of access to non-identifying and medical data. If one day someone conceived from their donation requested access to their identifying data, 62% of oocytes donors and 56% of sperm donors would grant it.

Conclusions: A significant proportion of our participants expressed the desire to benefit from information on possible descendants resulting from their donation. Among the donors interviewed, only half are informed of the legislation introducing access to origins, now two years after its implementation. These results encourage us to strengthen communication efforts around access to origins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie est un mensuel scientifique d''information et de formation destiné aux gynécologues, aux obstétriciens, aux sénologues et aux biologistes de la reproduction. La revue, dans ses éditoriaux, articles originaux, mises au point, lettres à la rédaction et autres rubriques, donne une information actualisée ayant trait à l''obstétrique et à la gynécologie et aux différentes spécialités développées à partir de ces deux pôles : médecine de la reproduction, médecine maternelle et fœtale, périnatalité, endocrinologie, chirurgie gynécologique, cancérologie pelvienne, sénologie, sexualité, psychosomatique…
期刊最新文献
[Sexuality of the couple during pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology: a comparative study.] [The role of mammography in prevention of cardiovascular risk in women]. [Factors influencing pain during intrauterine device insertion]. [Reception of oocytes from partner (ROPA) in France: context and perspectives]. [Recommendations for clinical practice: Prevention and management of varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection during pregnancy and the perinatal period (extended version)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1