通过蓝藻化抑制盐碱地的水土流失

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil & Tillage Research Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.still.2024.106446
Sudabeh Gharemahmudli , Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi
{"title":"通过蓝藻化抑制盐碱地的水土流失","authors":"Sudabeh Gharemahmudli ,&nbsp;Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil salinity is one of the essential factors of soil degradation and erosion in arid and semiarid regions, seriously limiting sustainable development. New technologies in controlling and restoring saline soils have to support the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. In the same vein, despite the approved role of biological amendments in controlling soil and water loss, the inoculation of soil cyanobacteria to reduce soil degradation in saline soils has yet to be considered. For this purpose, the studied soil was collected from the Incheboron Area in Northeast Golestan Province, Iran, due to saline and sodium soil being sensitive to water erosion and unstable ecological conditions. The experiments were set up in 0.5 × 0.5-m small erosion plots with soil having different salinities and slopes in the Rain and Erosion Simulation Laboratory of Tarbiat Modares University, Iran. The treated plots with endemic cyanobacteria and untreated (control) plots were compared after eight weeks under simulated rain conditions with an intensity of about 70 mm h<sup>−1</sup> lasting for 30 min. The results of the research showed that the runoff volume resulted from the simulated rainfall in the plots with low salinity and 10 % slope and high salinity and 5 % slope inoculated by cyanobacteria were 54.60 and 83.32 % less than untreated plots, respectively. Soil loss was also significantly inhibited (p &lt; 0.001) by seven and 16 times compared to the control treatment. In other words, the treatment of cyanobacteria inoculation on soil with high salinity and low slope was about eight times more effective than that of soil with low salinity and higher slope. Therefore, soil cyanobacteria inoculation can be considered an adequate soil and water conservation strategy in the saline region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 106446"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhibiting soil and water loss in a saline soil through cyanobacterization\",\"authors\":\"Sudabeh Gharemahmudli ,&nbsp;Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2024.106446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Soil salinity is one of the essential factors of soil degradation and erosion in arid and semiarid regions, seriously limiting sustainable development. New technologies in controlling and restoring saline soils have to support the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. In the same vein, despite the approved role of biological amendments in controlling soil and water loss, the inoculation of soil cyanobacteria to reduce soil degradation in saline soils has yet to be considered. For this purpose, the studied soil was collected from the Incheboron Area in Northeast Golestan Province, Iran, due to saline and sodium soil being sensitive to water erosion and unstable ecological conditions. The experiments were set up in 0.5 × 0.5-m small erosion plots with soil having different salinities and slopes in the Rain and Erosion Simulation Laboratory of Tarbiat Modares University, Iran. The treated plots with endemic cyanobacteria and untreated (control) plots were compared after eight weeks under simulated rain conditions with an intensity of about 70 mm h<sup>−1</sup> lasting for 30 min. The results of the research showed that the runoff volume resulted from the simulated rainfall in the plots with low salinity and 10 % slope and high salinity and 5 % slope inoculated by cyanobacteria were 54.60 and 83.32 % less than untreated plots, respectively. Soil loss was also significantly inhibited (p &lt; 0.001) by seven and 16 times compared to the control treatment. In other words, the treatment of cyanobacteria inoculation on soil with high salinity and low slope was about eight times more effective than that of soil with low salinity and higher slope. Therefore, soil cyanobacteria inoculation can be considered an adequate soil and water conservation strategy in the saline region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"248 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724004471\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724004471","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤盐分是干旱半干旱区土壤退化和侵蚀的重要因素之一,严重制约了可持续发展。控制和恢复盐碱地的新技术必须支持联合国可持续发展目标。同样,尽管生物改良剂在控制水土流失方面的作用已得到认可,但在盐渍土壤中接种土壤蓝藻以减少土壤退化尚未得到考虑。为此,研究土壤采集自伊朗东北部Golestan省Incheboron地区,因为盐碱地和钠土对水分侵蚀敏感,生态条件不稳定。实验设置在伊朗Tarbiat Modares大学降雨与侵蚀模拟实验室0.5 × 0.5 m不同盐碱度和坡度土壤侵蚀小地块。8周后,在强度约为70 mm h−1、持续30 min的模拟降雨条件下,将有地方性蓝藻的处理地块与未处理的(对照)地块进行比较。研究结果表明,低盐度、10 %坡度和高盐度、5 %坡度接种蓝藻后,模拟降雨产生的径流量分别比未接种蓝藻后减少54.60%和83.32% %。与对照处理相比,土壤流失量也显著减少了7倍和16倍(p <; 0.001)。也就是说,在高盐度、低坡度土壤上接种蓝藻的处理效果是低盐度、高坡度土壤的8倍左右。因此,在盐碱区接种土壤蓝藻可被认为是一种适当的水土保持策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inhibiting soil and water loss in a saline soil through cyanobacterization
Soil salinity is one of the essential factors of soil degradation and erosion in arid and semiarid regions, seriously limiting sustainable development. New technologies in controlling and restoring saline soils have to support the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. In the same vein, despite the approved role of biological amendments in controlling soil and water loss, the inoculation of soil cyanobacteria to reduce soil degradation in saline soils has yet to be considered. For this purpose, the studied soil was collected from the Incheboron Area in Northeast Golestan Province, Iran, due to saline and sodium soil being sensitive to water erosion and unstable ecological conditions. The experiments were set up in 0.5 × 0.5-m small erosion plots with soil having different salinities and slopes in the Rain and Erosion Simulation Laboratory of Tarbiat Modares University, Iran. The treated plots with endemic cyanobacteria and untreated (control) plots were compared after eight weeks under simulated rain conditions with an intensity of about 70 mm h−1 lasting for 30 min. The results of the research showed that the runoff volume resulted from the simulated rainfall in the plots with low salinity and 10 % slope and high salinity and 5 % slope inoculated by cyanobacteria were 54.60 and 83.32 % less than untreated plots, respectively. Soil loss was also significantly inhibited (p < 0.001) by seven and 16 times compared to the control treatment. In other words, the treatment of cyanobacteria inoculation on soil with high salinity and low slope was about eight times more effective than that of soil with low salinity and higher slope. Therefore, soil cyanobacteria inoculation can be considered an adequate soil and water conservation strategy in the saline region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
期刊最新文献
Hydrogen sulfide and earthworm casts can synergistically increase the cycling rate of soil arsenic Impact of Epichloë fungal endophyte-tall fescue symbiosis on mechanical characteristics of rooted soil depending on the host genotype Spatial and temporal evolution of soil organic matter and its response to dynamic factors in the Southern part of Black Soil Region of Northeast China Adaptive regulation of microbial community characteristics in response to nutrient limitations under mulching practices across distinct climate zones Vetch cover crops reduce the magnitude of citrus rhizosphere effect on plant-derived carbon by promoting suberin and lignin phenol accumulation in citrus orchard
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1