医疗保健全球化时代的损伤控制外科-军事和国际成果:系统回顾。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.020
Amelia Collings, Nicholas J Larson, Rachel Johnson, Ella Chrenka, Delanie Hoover, Ann Nguyen, Frances Ariole, Brian Olson, Tajanae Henderson, Pooja Avula, Dave Collins, David J Dries, Benoit Blondeau, Frederick B Rogers
{"title":"医疗保健全球化时代的损伤控制外科-军事和国际成果:系统回顾。","authors":"Amelia Collings, Nicholas J Larson, Rachel Johnson, Ella Chrenka, Delanie Hoover, Ann Nguyen, Frances Ariole, Brian Olson, Tajanae Henderson, Pooja Avula, Dave Collins, David J Dries, Benoit Blondeau, Frederick B Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Damage Control Surgery (DCS) is a surgical technique used to manage critically ill and injured patients. This study examines the most recent 10-y outcomes related to DCS, with the secondary goal of scrutinizing the outcomes after DCS across surgical theaters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies published between 2012 and 2021 that described adult patients undergoing Abdominal DCS after traumatic injury were included. Outcomes were reported as medians-of-means and interquartile range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria (9932 patients), all 52 were included in the Military versus Civilian comparison which includes 46 Civilian (9244 patients) and 6 Military (688 patients) studies. Forty-three studies were included in the United States (US) and non-US comparison, with 10 non-US (2092 patients), and 33 US (6572 patients) studies. Overall, study quality was low, the majority having a high or unclear risk of bias. Across all studies, the median 24-h mortality was 14% (5.1-21.2) and 30-d mortality was 17.9% (9.4-28.3). Between subgroups, the Military cohort had a 30-d mortality 9-fold lower than the Civilian cohort (2.1% versus 18.9%), and the non-US cohort had more than 3 times the 24-h mortality (23.8% versus 7.5%) and double the 30-d mortality (37.2% versus 14.6%) of the US cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Striking disparities are seen within current literature as it relates to outcomes after DCS between Military and Civilian and US and non-US populations. Trauma surgeons both within the US and internationally may benefit from looking to their Military counterparts for guidance to better care patients requiring DCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"101-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Damage Control Surgery in the Era of Globalization of Health Care - Military and International Outcomes: A SystematicReview.\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Collings, Nicholas J Larson, Rachel Johnson, Ella Chrenka, Delanie Hoover, Ann Nguyen, Frances Ariole, Brian Olson, Tajanae Henderson, Pooja Avula, Dave Collins, David J Dries, Benoit Blondeau, Frederick B Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Damage Control Surgery (DCS) is a surgical technique used to manage critically ill and injured patients. This study examines the most recent 10-y outcomes related to DCS, with the secondary goal of scrutinizing the outcomes after DCS across surgical theaters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies published between 2012 and 2021 that described adult patients undergoing Abdominal DCS after traumatic injury were included. Outcomes were reported as medians-of-means and interquartile range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria (9932 patients), all 52 were included in the Military versus Civilian comparison which includes 46 Civilian (9244 patients) and 6 Military (688 patients) studies. Forty-three studies were included in the United States (US) and non-US comparison, with 10 non-US (2092 patients), and 33 US (6572 patients) studies. Overall, study quality was low, the majority having a high or unclear risk of bias. Across all studies, the median 24-h mortality was 14% (5.1-21.2) and 30-d mortality was 17.9% (9.4-28.3). Between subgroups, the Military cohort had a 30-d mortality 9-fold lower than the Civilian cohort (2.1% versus 18.9%), and the non-US cohort had more than 3 times the 24-h mortality (23.8% versus 7.5%) and double the 30-d mortality (37.2% versus 14.6%) of the US cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Striking disparities are seen within current literature as it relates to outcomes after DCS between Military and Civilian and US and non-US populations. Trauma surgeons both within the US and internationally may benefit from looking to their Military counterparts for guidance to better care patients requiring DCS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"306 \",\"pages\":\"101-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:损伤控制外科(DCS)是一种用于治疗危重和受伤患者的外科技术。本研究检查了最近10年与DCS相关的结果,次要目标是审查整个手术室DCS后的结果。方法:纳入2012年至2021年间发表的描述创伤性损伤后接受腹部DCS的成年患者的研究。结果以中位数和四分位数范围报告。结果:52项研究符合纳入标准(9932例),所有52项研究均纳入军民比较,其中军民研究46项(9244例),军民研究6项(688例)。43项研究被纳入美国(US)和非美国比较,其中10项非美国(2092例患者)和33项美国(6572例患者)研究。总体而言,研究质量较低,大多数具有较高或不明确的偏倚风险。在所有研究中,24小时死亡率中位数为14%(5.1-21.2),30天死亡率中位数为17.9%(9.4-28.3)。在亚组之间,军事队列的30天死亡率比平民队列低9倍(2.1%对18.9%),非美国队列的24小时死亡率是美国队列的3倍多(23.8%对7.5%),30天死亡率是美国队列的两倍(37.2%对14.6%)。结论:在目前的文献中可以看到惊人的差异,因为它涉及到军事和平民以及美国和非美国人口之间DCS的结果。美国国内外的创伤外科医生都可以从他们的军事同行那里获得指导,以更好地照顾需要DCS的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Damage Control Surgery in the Era of Globalization of Health Care - Military and International Outcomes: A SystematicReview.

Introduction: Damage Control Surgery (DCS) is a surgical technique used to manage critically ill and injured patients. This study examines the most recent 10-y outcomes related to DCS, with the secondary goal of scrutinizing the outcomes after DCS across surgical theaters.

Methods: Studies published between 2012 and 2021 that described adult patients undergoing Abdominal DCS after traumatic injury were included. Outcomes were reported as medians-of-means and interquartile range.

Results: Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria (9932 patients), all 52 were included in the Military versus Civilian comparison which includes 46 Civilian (9244 patients) and 6 Military (688 patients) studies. Forty-three studies were included in the United States (US) and non-US comparison, with 10 non-US (2092 patients), and 33 US (6572 patients) studies. Overall, study quality was low, the majority having a high or unclear risk of bias. Across all studies, the median 24-h mortality was 14% (5.1-21.2) and 30-d mortality was 17.9% (9.4-28.3). Between subgroups, the Military cohort had a 30-d mortality 9-fold lower than the Civilian cohort (2.1% versus 18.9%), and the non-US cohort had more than 3 times the 24-h mortality (23.8% versus 7.5%) and double the 30-d mortality (37.2% versus 14.6%) of the US cohort.

Conclusions: Striking disparities are seen within current literature as it relates to outcomes after DCS between Military and Civilian and US and non-US populations. Trauma surgeons both within the US and internationally may benefit from looking to their Military counterparts for guidance to better care patients requiring DCS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Reducing Postoperative Opioids in Pediatric Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study. A Review of Long-Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation Using Extended Criteria Donors in the United States. Classification Systems of Surgical Complexity: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Recognizing the Need for Goals of Care Conversations Among Critically Ill Surgical Patients. Immunological Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Conversion Surgery Cases for Gastric Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1