Amelia Collings, Nicholas J Larson, Rachel Johnson, Ella Chrenka, Delanie Hoover, Ann Nguyen, Frances Ariole, Brian Olson, Tajanae Henderson, Pooja Avula, Dave Collins, David J Dries, Benoit Blondeau, Frederick B Rogers
{"title":"医疗保健全球化时代的损伤控制外科-军事和国际成果:系统回顾。","authors":"Amelia Collings, Nicholas J Larson, Rachel Johnson, Ella Chrenka, Delanie Hoover, Ann Nguyen, Frances Ariole, Brian Olson, Tajanae Henderson, Pooja Avula, Dave Collins, David J Dries, Benoit Blondeau, Frederick B Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Damage Control Surgery (DCS) is a surgical technique used to manage critically ill and injured patients. This study examines the most recent 10-y outcomes related to DCS, with the secondary goal of scrutinizing the outcomes after DCS across surgical theaters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies published between 2012 and 2021 that described adult patients undergoing Abdominal DCS after traumatic injury were included. Outcomes were reported as medians-of-means and interquartile range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria (9932 patients), all 52 were included in the Military versus Civilian comparison which includes 46 Civilian (9244 patients) and 6 Military (688 patients) studies. Forty-three studies were included in the United States (US) and non-US comparison, with 10 non-US (2092 patients), and 33 US (6572 patients) studies. Overall, study quality was low, the majority having a high or unclear risk of bias. Across all studies, the median 24-h mortality was 14% (5.1-21.2) and 30-d mortality was 17.9% (9.4-28.3). Between subgroups, the Military cohort had a 30-d mortality 9-fold lower than the Civilian cohort (2.1% versus 18.9%), and the non-US cohort had more than 3 times the 24-h mortality (23.8% versus 7.5%) and double the 30-d mortality (37.2% versus 14.6%) of the US cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Striking disparities are seen within current literature as it relates to outcomes after DCS between Military and Civilian and US and non-US populations. Trauma surgeons both within the US and internationally may benefit from looking to their Military counterparts for guidance to better care patients requiring DCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"101-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Damage Control Surgery in the Era of Globalization of Health Care - Military and International Outcomes: A SystematicReview.\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Collings, Nicholas J Larson, Rachel Johnson, Ella Chrenka, Delanie Hoover, Ann Nguyen, Frances Ariole, Brian Olson, Tajanae Henderson, Pooja Avula, Dave Collins, David J Dries, Benoit Blondeau, Frederick B Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Damage Control Surgery (DCS) is a surgical technique used to manage critically ill and injured patients. This study examines the most recent 10-y outcomes related to DCS, with the secondary goal of scrutinizing the outcomes after DCS across surgical theaters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies published between 2012 and 2021 that described adult patients undergoing Abdominal DCS after traumatic injury were included. Outcomes were reported as medians-of-means and interquartile range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria (9932 patients), all 52 were included in the Military versus Civilian comparison which includes 46 Civilian (9244 patients) and 6 Military (688 patients) studies. Forty-three studies were included in the United States (US) and non-US comparison, with 10 non-US (2092 patients), and 33 US (6572 patients) studies. Overall, study quality was low, the majority having a high or unclear risk of bias. Across all studies, the median 24-h mortality was 14% (5.1-21.2) and 30-d mortality was 17.9% (9.4-28.3). Between subgroups, the Military cohort had a 30-d mortality 9-fold lower than the Civilian cohort (2.1% versus 18.9%), and the non-US cohort had more than 3 times the 24-h mortality (23.8% versus 7.5%) and double the 30-d mortality (37.2% versus 14.6%) of the US cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Striking disparities are seen within current literature as it relates to outcomes after DCS between Military and Civilian and US and non-US populations. Trauma surgeons both within the US and internationally may benefit from looking to their Military counterparts for guidance to better care patients requiring DCS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"306 \",\"pages\":\"101-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Damage Control Surgery in the Era of Globalization of Health Care - Military and International Outcomes: A SystematicReview.
Introduction: Damage Control Surgery (DCS) is a surgical technique used to manage critically ill and injured patients. This study examines the most recent 10-y outcomes related to DCS, with the secondary goal of scrutinizing the outcomes after DCS across surgical theaters.
Methods: Studies published between 2012 and 2021 that described adult patients undergoing Abdominal DCS after traumatic injury were included. Outcomes were reported as medians-of-means and interquartile range.
Results: Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria (9932 patients), all 52 were included in the Military versus Civilian comparison which includes 46 Civilian (9244 patients) and 6 Military (688 patients) studies. Forty-three studies were included in the United States (US) and non-US comparison, with 10 non-US (2092 patients), and 33 US (6572 patients) studies. Overall, study quality was low, the majority having a high or unclear risk of bias. Across all studies, the median 24-h mortality was 14% (5.1-21.2) and 30-d mortality was 17.9% (9.4-28.3). Between subgroups, the Military cohort had a 30-d mortality 9-fold lower than the Civilian cohort (2.1% versus 18.9%), and the non-US cohort had more than 3 times the 24-h mortality (23.8% versus 7.5%) and double the 30-d mortality (37.2% versus 14.6%) of the US cohort.
Conclusions: Striking disparities are seen within current literature as it relates to outcomes after DCS between Military and Civilian and US and non-US populations. Trauma surgeons both within the US and internationally may benefit from looking to their Military counterparts for guidance to better care patients requiring DCS.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.