基于app的饮食教育对2型糖尿病患者饮食摄入和心脏代谢风险指标的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1186/s12937-024-01069-2
Linnea Sjöblom, Essi Hantikainen, Anna Dahlgren, Ylva Trolle Lagerros, Stephanie E Bonn
{"title":"基于app的饮食教育对2型糖尿病患者饮食摄入和心脏代谢风险指标的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果","authors":"Linnea Sjöblom, Essi Hantikainen, Anna Dahlgren, Ylva Trolle Lagerros, Stephanie E Bonn","doi":"10.1186/s12937-024-01069-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>mHealth, i.e. mobile-health, strategies may be used as a complement to regular care to support healthy dietary habits in primary care patients. We evaluated the effect of a 12-week smartphone-based dietary education on overall diet quality (primary outcome), and dietary intake and cardiometabolic risk markers (secondary outcomes) in people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this two-armed randomized clinical trial, people with type 2 diabetes were recruited within a primary care setting and randomized 1:1 to a smartphone-delivered dietary education for 12 weeks or a control group receiving regular care only. Dietary intake and cardiometabolic risk markers were measured at baseline and after 3 months. Diet was assessed using a 4-day dietary record and a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Overall diet quality was estimated with a Nordic Nutrition Recommendation (NNR) score and specific dietary intake was estimated for 13 food groups/nutrients. We used linear regression models to examine differences in change from baseline to the 3-month follow-up between the intervention and control group, adjusted for baseline values of each outcome variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 129 participants (67 in the intervention group and 62 controls), of whom 61% were men. At baseline, mean age was 63.0 years and mean body mass index was 29.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. When analyzing dietary record data, we found no effect of the intervention on diet quality or intake, however, the control group had increased their score by 1.6 points (95%CI: -2.9, -0.26) compared to the intervention group. In the analyses of FFQ data, the intervention group had lowered their daily intake in grams of saturated (β = -4.1, 95%CI: -7.9, -0.2) and unsaturated (mono- and polyunsaturated) (β = -6.9, 95%CI: -13.5, -0.4) fat more than the control group. The intervention group also presented lower serum triglycerides levels than the controls (β = -0.33, 95%CI: -0.60, -0.05). No statistical differences were found in any other dietary variables or cardiometabolic risk markers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While we found no effect on overall diet quality, our findings suggest that a smartphone-based dietary education might impact dietary fat intake and corresponding cardiometabolic risk markers in people with type 2 diabetes. Our results should be considered hypothesis-generating and need to be confirmed in future studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03784612 ). Registered 24 December 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":19203,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of an app-based dietary education on dietary intake and cardiometabolic risk markers in people with type 2 diabetes: results from a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Linnea Sjöblom, Essi Hantikainen, Anna Dahlgren, Ylva Trolle Lagerros, Stephanie E Bonn\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12937-024-01069-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>mHealth, i.e. mobile-health, strategies may be used as a complement to regular care to support healthy dietary habits in primary care patients. We evaluated the effect of a 12-week smartphone-based dietary education on overall diet quality (primary outcome), and dietary intake and cardiometabolic risk markers (secondary outcomes) in people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this two-armed randomized clinical trial, people with type 2 diabetes were recruited within a primary care setting and randomized 1:1 to a smartphone-delivered dietary education for 12 weeks or a control group receiving regular care only. Dietary intake and cardiometabolic risk markers were measured at baseline and after 3 months. Diet was assessed using a 4-day dietary record and a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Overall diet quality was estimated with a Nordic Nutrition Recommendation (NNR) score and specific dietary intake was estimated for 13 food groups/nutrients. We used linear regression models to examine differences in change from baseline to the 3-month follow-up between the intervention and control group, adjusted for baseline values of each outcome variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 129 participants (67 in the intervention group and 62 controls), of whom 61% were men. At baseline, mean age was 63.0 years and mean body mass index was 29.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. When analyzing dietary record data, we found no effect of the intervention on diet quality or intake, however, the control group had increased their score by 1.6 points (95%CI: -2.9, -0.26) compared to the intervention group. In the analyses of FFQ data, the intervention group had lowered their daily intake in grams of saturated (β = -4.1, 95%CI: -7.9, -0.2) and unsaturated (mono- and polyunsaturated) (β = -6.9, 95%CI: -13.5, -0.4) fat more than the control group. The intervention group also presented lower serum triglycerides levels than the controls (β = -0.33, 95%CI: -0.60, -0.05). No statistical differences were found in any other dietary variables or cardiometabolic risk markers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While we found no effect on overall diet quality, our findings suggest that a smartphone-based dietary education might impact dietary fat intake and corresponding cardiometabolic risk markers in people with type 2 diabetes. Our results should be considered hypothesis-generating and need to be confirmed in future studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03784612 ). Registered 24 December 2018.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699681/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-024-01069-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-024-01069-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:移动保健,即移动保健战略可作为常规保健的补充,以支持初级保健患者的健康饮食习惯。我们评估了为期12周的基于智能手机的饮食教育对2型糖尿病患者总体饮食质量(主要结局)、饮食摄入量和心脏代谢风险指标(次要结局)的影响。方法:在这项双臂随机临床试验中,在初级保健机构招募了2型糖尿病患者,并按1:1的比例随机分配到智能手机提供的饮食教育组,为期12周,或只接受常规护理的对照组。在基线和3个月后测量饮食摄入量和心脏代谢风险指标。采用4天饮食记录和食物频率问卷(FFQ)对饮食进行评估。采用北欧营养推荐(NNR)评分对总体膳食质量进行评估,并对13种食物组/营养素的特定膳食摄入量进行评估。我们使用线性回归模型来检查干预组和对照组从基线到3个月随访期间的变化差异,并根据每个结果变量的基线值进行调整。结果:研究纳入129名参与者(干预组67人,对照组62人),其中61%为男性。基线时平均年龄为63.0岁,平均体重指数为29.8 kg/m2。在分析饮食记录数据时,我们发现干预对饮食质量和摄入量没有影响,但对照组的得分比干预组提高了1.6分(95%CI: -2.9, -0.26)。在对FFQ数据的分析中,干预组比对照组降低了饱和脂肪(β = -4.1, 95%CI: -7.9, -0.2)和不饱和脂肪(β = -6.9, 95%CI: -13.5, -0.4)的每日摄入量。干预组的血清甘油三酯水平也低于对照组(β = -0.33, 95%CI: -0.60, -0.05)。在其他饮食变量或心脏代谢风险指标上没有发现统计学差异。结论:虽然我们没有发现对整体饮食质量的影响,但我们的研究结果表明,基于智能手机的饮食教育可能会影响2型糖尿病患者的饮食脂肪摄入量和相应的心脏代谢风险指标。我们的结果应该被认为是假设生成,需要在未来的研究中得到证实。试验注册:在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03784612)。2018年12月24日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of an app-based dietary education on dietary intake and cardiometabolic risk markers in people with type 2 diabetes: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Background: mHealth, i.e. mobile-health, strategies may be used as a complement to regular care to support healthy dietary habits in primary care patients. We evaluated the effect of a 12-week smartphone-based dietary education on overall diet quality (primary outcome), and dietary intake and cardiometabolic risk markers (secondary outcomes) in people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: In this two-armed randomized clinical trial, people with type 2 diabetes were recruited within a primary care setting and randomized 1:1 to a smartphone-delivered dietary education for 12 weeks or a control group receiving regular care only. Dietary intake and cardiometabolic risk markers were measured at baseline and after 3 months. Diet was assessed using a 4-day dietary record and a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Overall diet quality was estimated with a Nordic Nutrition Recommendation (NNR) score and specific dietary intake was estimated for 13 food groups/nutrients. We used linear regression models to examine differences in change from baseline to the 3-month follow-up between the intervention and control group, adjusted for baseline values of each outcome variable.

Results: The study included 129 participants (67 in the intervention group and 62 controls), of whom 61% were men. At baseline, mean age was 63.0 years and mean body mass index was 29.8 kg/m2. When analyzing dietary record data, we found no effect of the intervention on diet quality or intake, however, the control group had increased their score by 1.6 points (95%CI: -2.9, -0.26) compared to the intervention group. In the analyses of FFQ data, the intervention group had lowered their daily intake in grams of saturated (β = -4.1, 95%CI: -7.9, -0.2) and unsaturated (mono- and polyunsaturated) (β = -6.9, 95%CI: -13.5, -0.4) fat more than the control group. The intervention group also presented lower serum triglycerides levels than the controls (β = -0.33, 95%CI: -0.60, -0.05). No statistical differences were found in any other dietary variables or cardiometabolic risk markers.

Conclusion: While we found no effect on overall diet quality, our findings suggest that a smartphone-based dietary education might impact dietary fat intake and corresponding cardiometabolic risk markers in people with type 2 diabetes. Our results should be considered hypothesis-generating and need to be confirmed in future studies.

Trial registration: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03784612 ). Registered 24 December 2018.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Journal
Nutrition Journal NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Journal publishes surveillance, epidemiologic, and intervention research that sheds light on i) influences (e.g., familial, environmental) on eating patterns; ii) associations between eating patterns and health, and iii) strategies to improve eating patterns among populations. The journal also welcomes manuscripts reporting on the psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) and feasibility of methods (e.g., for assessing dietary intake) for human nutrition research. In addition, study protocols for controlled trials and cohort studies, with an emphasis on methods for assessing dietary exposures and outcomes as well as intervention components, will be considered. Manuscripts that consider eating patterns holistically, as opposed to solely reductionist approaches that focus on specific dietary components in isolation, are encouraged. Also encouraged are papers that take a holistic or systems perspective in attempting to understand possible compensatory and differential effects of nutrition interventions. The journal does not consider animal studies. In addition to the influence of eating patterns for human health, we also invite research providing insights into the environmental sustainability of dietary practices. Again, a holistic perspective is encouraged, for example, through the consideration of how eating patterns might maximize both human and planetary health.
期刊最新文献
Burden of diseases attributable to excess body weight in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019. The effect of magnesium supplementation on serum concentration of lipid profile: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials. An exploratory study of serum creatine kinase as a prognostic marker for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: looking into the relationship with body composition. Association of ultra-processed food-related metabolites with selected biochemical markers in the UK Biobank. Dairy intake and cognitive function in older adults in three cohorts: a mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1