Erik Stiles, Ricky Harika, Madhan Kuppusamy, Joel Sternbach, Donald E Low, Michal Hubka
{"title":"在ERAS中心,大多数机器人肺叶切除术患者的早期活动和胸管拔除与术后第一天出院有关。","authors":"Erik Stiles, Ricky Harika, Madhan Kuppusamy, Joel Sternbach, Donald E Low, Michal Hubka","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in robotic lobectomy have been associated with decreased length of stay (LOS). We evaluated differences in patient characteristics and achievements of ERAS benchmarks by discharge groups at a tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained ERAS database of patients undergoing robotic lobectomy for pulmonary malignancy. Patients were trifurcated into LOS groups, postoperative day 1, 2-3, and 4+. Preoperative and perioperative variables, ERAS achievement, complications, and readmissions were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2018 and August 2022, 145 consecutive patients were reviewed. Eighty-two (56.6%) were discharged on POD 1, 50 (34.5%) on POD 2-3, and 13 (9.0%) on POD 4+. Patients achieving POD 1 discharge were associated with better preoperative pulmonary function (FEV<sub>1</sub> p = 0.023 and DLCO p = 0.007) and shorter operative times (p < 0.001). Most air leaks (n = 30, 54.5%) were resolved by discharge; however, 25 (17.2%) were discharged with a chest tube. The POD 1 discharge group ambulated earlier (p = 0.005) and experienced no inpatient complications. Multivariate analysis reveals that operative time, time to first ambulation, and postoperative day 1 air leak were negatively associated with POD 1 discharge. Those who experienced a minor inpatient complication ambulated 5.8 h later than those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Utilization of ERAS principles can facilitate POD 1 discharge in the majority of patients undergoing robotic assisted lobectomy without an increase in complications or readmissions. Early ambulation and chest tube removal are modifiable elements of ERAS associated with POD 1 discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"316-326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early ambulation and chest tube removal are associated with postoperative day one discharge in majority of robotic pulmonary lobectomy patients at an ERAS center.\",\"authors\":\"Erik Stiles, Ricky Harika, Madhan Kuppusamy, Joel Sternbach, Donald E Low, Michal Hubka\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjs.12453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in robotic lobectomy have been associated with decreased length of stay (LOS). We evaluated differences in patient characteristics and achievements of ERAS benchmarks by discharge groups at a tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained ERAS database of patients undergoing robotic lobectomy for pulmonary malignancy. Patients were trifurcated into LOS groups, postoperative day 1, 2-3, and 4+. Preoperative and perioperative variables, ERAS achievement, complications, and readmissions were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2018 and August 2022, 145 consecutive patients were reviewed. Eighty-two (56.6%) were discharged on POD 1, 50 (34.5%) on POD 2-3, and 13 (9.0%) on POD 4+. Patients achieving POD 1 discharge were associated with better preoperative pulmonary function (FEV<sub>1</sub> p = 0.023 and DLCO p = 0.007) and shorter operative times (p < 0.001). Most air leaks (n = 30, 54.5%) were resolved by discharge; however, 25 (17.2%) were discharged with a chest tube. The POD 1 discharge group ambulated earlier (p = 0.005) and experienced no inpatient complications. Multivariate analysis reveals that operative time, time to first ambulation, and postoperative day 1 air leak were negatively associated with POD 1 discharge. Those who experienced a minor inpatient complication ambulated 5.8 h later than those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Utilization of ERAS principles can facilitate POD 1 discharge in the majority of patients undergoing robotic assisted lobectomy without an increase in complications or readmissions. Early ambulation and chest tube removal are modifiable elements of ERAS associated with POD 1 discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"316-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12453\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在机器人肺叶切除术中应用增强术后恢复(ERAS)途径与减少住院时间(LOS)有关。我们评估了三级转诊中心出院组患者特征和ERAS基准成绩的差异。材料和方法:我们对一个前瞻性维护的ERAS数据库进行了回顾性分析,该数据库包含了因肺部恶性肿瘤而接受机器人肺叶切除术的患者。将患者分为LOS组,分别为术后第1天、第2-3天和第4天。分析术前和围手术期变量、ERAS成就、并发症和再入院情况。结果:2018年10月至2022年8月,对145例连续患者进行了回顾。POD 1出院82例(56.6%),POD 2-3出院50例(34.5%),POD 4+出院13例(9.0%)。实现POD 1出院的患者术前肺功能较好(FEV1 p = 0.023, DLCO p = 0.007),手术时间较短(p)。结论:在大多数机器人辅助肺叶切除术患者中,应用ERAS原则可促进POD 1出院,且并发症和再入院率均未增加。早期活动和胸管拔除是与POD 1出院相关的ERAS的可修改因素。
Early ambulation and chest tube removal are associated with postoperative day one discharge in majority of robotic pulmonary lobectomy patients at an ERAS center.
Background: Application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in robotic lobectomy have been associated with decreased length of stay (LOS). We evaluated differences in patient characteristics and achievements of ERAS benchmarks by discharge groups at a tertiary referral center.
Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained ERAS database of patients undergoing robotic lobectomy for pulmonary malignancy. Patients were trifurcated into LOS groups, postoperative day 1, 2-3, and 4+. Preoperative and perioperative variables, ERAS achievement, complications, and readmissions were analyzed.
Results: Between October 2018 and August 2022, 145 consecutive patients were reviewed. Eighty-two (56.6%) were discharged on POD 1, 50 (34.5%) on POD 2-3, and 13 (9.0%) on POD 4+. Patients achieving POD 1 discharge were associated with better preoperative pulmonary function (FEV1 p = 0.023 and DLCO p = 0.007) and shorter operative times (p < 0.001). Most air leaks (n = 30, 54.5%) were resolved by discharge; however, 25 (17.2%) were discharged with a chest tube. The POD 1 discharge group ambulated earlier (p = 0.005) and experienced no inpatient complications. Multivariate analysis reveals that operative time, time to first ambulation, and postoperative day 1 air leak were negatively associated with POD 1 discharge. Those who experienced a minor inpatient complication ambulated 5.8 h later than those who did not.
Conclusion: Utilization of ERAS principles can facilitate POD 1 discharge in the majority of patients undergoing robotic assisted lobectomy without an increase in complications or readmissions. Early ambulation and chest tube removal are modifiable elements of ERAS associated with POD 1 discharge.
期刊介绍:
World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.