R Ahluwalia, T Lewis, Z Marhoon, C Bano, T Howard, H Greenberg, A Vasireddy, A Din, E Fitzgerald O'Connor, V Rose, I Reichert
{"title":"闭合性与开放性单纯性踝关节骨折需要软组织重建的临床结果:一项前瞻性比较观察研究。","authors":"R Ahluwalia, T Lewis, Z Marhoon, C Bano, T Howard, H Greenberg, A Vasireddy, A Din, E Fitzgerald O'Connor, V Rose, I Reichert","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contemporary guidelines advocate for initial debridement and single-stage definitive fixation with immediate soft tissue reconstruction for open fractures. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of single-stage stabilization and immediate definitive soft tissue coverage in open ankle fractures compared to closed fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared all isolated open ankle fractures (OF) treated between January 2017 and June 2019 to a control group of operatively managed closed ankle fractures (CF). The OF group included patients with extensive soft tissue injury loss with periosteal stripping and bone exposure (Gustilo and Anderson IIIB) requiring split skin graft, rotational flap or free flap. Clinical outcomes assessed included infection rates, amputation, revision hardware surgery, surgical reduction, non-union rates, and functional outcomes (assessed using the MOXFQ and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires). Health provider matrices were utilized to evaluate cost-benefit parameters, such as length of stay (LOS). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 OF and 35 CF cases with AO classification 44 A-C fractures were analyzed following standard treatment protocols. No amputations were reported, but deep/superficial infections occurred in 3 patients in the OF group compared to 2 in the CF group. There was a three-folds increase in mal-union (P = .11), rates of additional surgeries and discharge times in the OF group. (P < 0.05). However, return to functional weight bearing between OF (mean 10.6 weeks) and CF (mean 7.2 weeks) was similar (P = 0.06), and there were no significant differences in EQ-5D-5L and MOXFQ scores at the end of orthopaedic treatment p = 0.5 and 0.16 respectively. The mean hospital LOS was significantly longer for OF (15.6 days) compared to CF (5.4 days) (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Definitive stabilization and immediate soft tissue reconstruction in the management of open ankle fractures result in high rates of limb salvage and achieve functional outcomes similar to those seen in matched closed ankle fractures upon completion of orthopedic treatment. Although the patient journey is extended, soft tissue and infective complications do not significantly differ. This calls for further investigation to establish the long-term cost-benefit implications of this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of closed versus open simple ankle fractures patterns requiring soft tissue reconstruction: A prospective comparative observational study.\",\"authors\":\"R Ahluwalia, T Lewis, Z Marhoon, C Bano, T Howard, H Greenberg, A Vasireddy, A Din, E Fitzgerald O'Connor, V Rose, I Reichert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contemporary guidelines advocate for initial debridement and single-stage definitive fixation with immediate soft tissue reconstruction for open fractures. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of single-stage stabilization and immediate definitive soft tissue coverage in open ankle fractures compared to closed fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared all isolated open ankle fractures (OF) treated between January 2017 and June 2019 to a control group of operatively managed closed ankle fractures (CF). The OF group included patients with extensive soft tissue injury loss with periosteal stripping and bone exposure (Gustilo and Anderson IIIB) requiring split skin graft, rotational flap or free flap. Clinical outcomes assessed included infection rates, amputation, revision hardware surgery, surgical reduction, non-union rates, and functional outcomes (assessed using the MOXFQ and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires). Health provider matrices were utilized to evaluate cost-benefit parameters, such as length of stay (LOS). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 OF and 35 CF cases with AO classification 44 A-C fractures were analyzed following standard treatment protocols. No amputations were reported, but deep/superficial infections occurred in 3 patients in the OF group compared to 2 in the CF group. There was a three-folds increase in mal-union (P = .11), rates of additional surgeries and discharge times in the OF group. (P < 0.05). However, return to functional weight bearing between OF (mean 10.6 weeks) and CF (mean 7.2 weeks) was similar (P = 0.06), and there were no significant differences in EQ-5D-5L and MOXFQ scores at the end of orthopaedic treatment p = 0.5 and 0.16 respectively. The mean hospital LOS was significantly longer for OF (15.6 days) compared to CF (5.4 days) (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Definitive stabilization and immediate soft tissue reconstruction in the management of open ankle fractures result in high rates of limb salvage and achieve functional outcomes similar to those seen in matched closed ankle fractures upon completion of orthopedic treatment. Although the patient journey is extended, soft tissue and infective complications do not significantly differ. This calls for further investigation to establish the long-term cost-benefit implications of this approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical outcomes of closed versus open simple ankle fractures patterns requiring soft tissue reconstruction: A prospective comparative observational study.
Background: Contemporary guidelines advocate for initial debridement and single-stage definitive fixation with immediate soft tissue reconstruction for open fractures. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of single-stage stabilization and immediate definitive soft tissue coverage in open ankle fractures compared to closed fractures.
Methods: We compared all isolated open ankle fractures (OF) treated between January 2017 and June 2019 to a control group of operatively managed closed ankle fractures (CF). The OF group included patients with extensive soft tissue injury loss with periosteal stripping and bone exposure (Gustilo and Anderson IIIB) requiring split skin graft, rotational flap or free flap. Clinical outcomes assessed included infection rates, amputation, revision hardware surgery, surgical reduction, non-union rates, and functional outcomes (assessed using the MOXFQ and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires). Health provider matrices were utilized to evaluate cost-benefit parameters, such as length of stay (LOS). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level set at P < 0.05.
Results: A total of 27 OF and 35 CF cases with AO classification 44 A-C fractures were analyzed following standard treatment protocols. No amputations were reported, but deep/superficial infections occurred in 3 patients in the OF group compared to 2 in the CF group. There was a three-folds increase in mal-union (P = .11), rates of additional surgeries and discharge times in the OF group. (P < 0.05). However, return to functional weight bearing between OF (mean 10.6 weeks) and CF (mean 7.2 weeks) was similar (P = 0.06), and there were no significant differences in EQ-5D-5L and MOXFQ scores at the end of orthopaedic treatment p = 0.5 and 0.16 respectively. The mean hospital LOS was significantly longer for OF (15.6 days) compared to CF (5.4 days) (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Definitive stabilization and immediate soft tissue reconstruction in the management of open ankle fractures result in high rates of limb salvage and achieve functional outcomes similar to those seen in matched closed ankle fractures upon completion of orthopedic treatment. Although the patient journey is extended, soft tissue and infective complications do not significantly differ. This calls for further investigation to establish the long-term cost-benefit implications of this approach.
期刊介绍:
Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society.
The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.