可解释的机器学习预测晚期非小细胞肺癌的治疗反应。

IF 3.6 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1200/CCI-24-00157
Vinayak S Ahluwalia, Ravi B Parikh
{"title":"可解释的机器学习预测晚期非小细胞肺癌的治疗反应。","authors":"Vinayak S Ahluwalia, Ravi B Parikh","doi":"10.1200/CCI-24-00157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated promise in the treatment of various cancers. Single-drug ICI therapy (immuno-oncology [IO] monotherapy) that targets PD-L1 is the standard of care in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression ≥50%. We sought to find out if a machine learning (ML) algorithm can perform better as a predictive biomarker than PD-L1 alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a real-world, nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database of 38,048 patients with advanced NSCLC, we trained binary prediction algorithms to predict likelihood of 12-month progression-free survival (PFS; 12-month PFS) and 12-month overall survival (OS; 12-month OS) from initiation of first-line therapy. We evaluated the algorithms by calculating the AUC on the test set. We plotted Kaplan-Meier curves and fit Cox survival models comparing survival between patients who were classified as low-risk (LR) for 12-month disease progression or 12-month mortality versus those classified as high-risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ML algorithms achieved an AUC of 0.701 (95% CI, 0.689 to 0.714) and 0.718 (95% CI, 0.707 to 0.730) for 12-month PFS and 12-month OS, respectively. Patients in the LR group had lower 12-month disease progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.50]; <i>P</i> < .001) and 12-month all-cause mortality (HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.34]; <i>P</i> < .0001) compared with the high-risk group. Patients deemed LR for disease progression and mortality on IO monotherapy were less likely to progress (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.61]; <i>P</i> < .0001) or die (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.37]; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with the high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An ML algorithm can more accurately predict response to first-line therapy, including IO monotherapy, in patients with advanced NSCLC, compared with PD-L1 alone. ML may better aid clinical decision making in oncology than a single biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Treatment Response in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Vinayak S Ahluwalia, Ravi B Parikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/CCI-24-00157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated promise in the treatment of various cancers. Single-drug ICI therapy (immuno-oncology [IO] monotherapy) that targets PD-L1 is the standard of care in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression ≥50%. We sought to find out if a machine learning (ML) algorithm can perform better as a predictive biomarker than PD-L1 alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a real-world, nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database of 38,048 patients with advanced NSCLC, we trained binary prediction algorithms to predict likelihood of 12-month progression-free survival (PFS; 12-month PFS) and 12-month overall survival (OS; 12-month OS) from initiation of first-line therapy. We evaluated the algorithms by calculating the AUC on the test set. We plotted Kaplan-Meier curves and fit Cox survival models comparing survival between patients who were classified as low-risk (LR) for 12-month disease progression or 12-month mortality versus those classified as high-risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ML algorithms achieved an AUC of 0.701 (95% CI, 0.689 to 0.714) and 0.718 (95% CI, 0.707 to 0.730) for 12-month PFS and 12-month OS, respectively. Patients in the LR group had lower 12-month disease progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.50]; <i>P</i> < .001) and 12-month all-cause mortality (HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.34]; <i>P</i> < .0001) compared with the high-risk group. Patients deemed LR for disease progression and mortality on IO monotherapy were less likely to progress (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.61]; <i>P</i> < .0001) or die (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.37]; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with the high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An ML algorithm can more accurately predict response to first-line therapy, including IO monotherapy, in patients with advanced NSCLC, compared with PD-L1 alone. ML may better aid clinical decision making in oncology than a single biomarker.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2400157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706357/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在治疗各种癌症方面已经显示出前景。靶向PD-L1的单药ICI治疗(免疫肿瘤学[IO]单药治疗)是PD-L1表达≥50%的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的标准治疗方案。我们试图找出机器学习(ML)算法是否可以比单独使用PD-L1更好地作为预测性生物标志物。方法:使用真实世界的全国性电子健康记录衍生的未识别数据库,包括38,048例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,我们训练二元预测算法来预测12个月无进展生存(PFS;12个月PFS)和12个月总生存期(OS;开始一线治疗后12个月(OS)。我们通过计算测试集上的AUC来评估算法。我们绘制Kaplan-Meier曲线并拟合Cox生存模型,比较低危(LR)患者12个月疾病进展或12个月死亡率与高危患者的生存率。结果:ML算法的12个月PFS和12个月OS的AUC分别为0.701 (95% CI, 0.689至0.714)和0.718 (95% CI, 0.707至0.730)。LR组患者12个月的疾病进展较低(风险比[HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.45 ~ 0.50];P < 0.001)和12个月全因死亡率(HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.29 ~ 0.34];P < 0.0001)。经IO单药治疗认为疾病进展为LR的患者和死亡率进展的可能性较小(HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.46至0.61];P < 0.0001)或死亡(HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.24 ~ 0.37];P < 0.001)。结论:与单独使用PD-L1相比,ML算法可以更准确地预测晚期NSCLC患者对一线治疗(包括IO单药治疗)的反应。ML可能比单一的生物标志物更有助于肿瘤学的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Treatment Response in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated promise in the treatment of various cancers. Single-drug ICI therapy (immuno-oncology [IO] monotherapy) that targets PD-L1 is the standard of care in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression ≥50%. We sought to find out if a machine learning (ML) algorithm can perform better as a predictive biomarker than PD-L1 alone.

Methods: Using a real-world, nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database of 38,048 patients with advanced NSCLC, we trained binary prediction algorithms to predict likelihood of 12-month progression-free survival (PFS; 12-month PFS) and 12-month overall survival (OS; 12-month OS) from initiation of first-line therapy. We evaluated the algorithms by calculating the AUC on the test set. We plotted Kaplan-Meier curves and fit Cox survival models comparing survival between patients who were classified as low-risk (LR) for 12-month disease progression or 12-month mortality versus those classified as high-risk.

Results: The ML algorithms achieved an AUC of 0.701 (95% CI, 0.689 to 0.714) and 0.718 (95% CI, 0.707 to 0.730) for 12-month PFS and 12-month OS, respectively. Patients in the LR group had lower 12-month disease progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.50]; P < .001) and 12-month all-cause mortality (HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.34]; P < .0001) compared with the high-risk group. Patients deemed LR for disease progression and mortality on IO monotherapy were less likely to progress (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.61]; P < .0001) or die (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.37]; P < .001) compared with the high-risk group.

Conclusion: An ML algorithm can more accurately predict response to first-line therapy, including IO monotherapy, in patients with advanced NSCLC, compared with PD-L1 alone. ML may better aid clinical decision making in oncology than a single biomarker.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
期刊最新文献
Rule-Based Algorithm to Identify Recurrent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Electronic Health Data. Patient-Reported Symptom Burden Among Thyroid Cancer Survivors: Retrospective Cohort Study. Equity and Automation in Clinical Trial Screening: Risks and Responsibilities of Artificial Intelligence‑Enabled Matching and Enrollment Systems. Integrating Natural Language Processing With ChatGPT to Improve Quality of Artificial Intelligence Summaries of Prostate Cancer Consultations. Enhancing Outcome Measurement in Oncology Clinical Trials Through Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1