异质性空间再分布对质子束特性的影响。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104882
Manikandan Arjunan , Dayananda Sharma Shamurailatpam , Kartikeswar Ch Patro , Suryakant Kaushik , Ganapathy Krishnan
{"title":"异质性空间再分布对质子束特性的影响。","authors":"Manikandan Arjunan ,&nbsp;Dayananda Sharma Shamurailatpam ,&nbsp;Kartikeswar Ch Patro ,&nbsp;Suryakant Kaushik ,&nbsp;Ganapathy Krishnan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to investigate the fundamental properties of spot-scanning proton beams and compare them to Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, both with and without CT calibration, using spatially diverse combinations of materials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A heterogeneous phantom was created by spatially distributing titanium, wax, and thermocol to generate six scenarios of heterogeneous combinations. Proton pencil beams ranging in energy from 100 to 226.2 MeV were directed perpendicular to each heterogeneous combination, and the exit proton was measured using a Lynx scintillation detector and a Zebra Multi-Layer-Ionization-Chamber for depth dose and spot profile measurements, respectively. The identical measurement configuration was duplicated in the RayStation-TPS. The measured and simulated RayStation-MC beam characteristics were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that at 100 MeV, the mean standard deviation of spot size was 5.66 ± 0.27 mm, while at 226.2 MeV, it rapidly decreased to 3.37 ± 0.07 mm. The physical phantom showed a larger perturbation difference between measurement and MC simulation than the virtual phantom. MC overestimates ranges up to 1.5 % in virtual phantoms, but underestimates ranges up to 5 % in physical phantoms. Range perturbations over 1 mm occurred in 35.7 % of virtual phantom measurements and in 85.7 % of physical phantom measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite using a CT artefact reduction approach and an accurate Monte-Carlo dose calculation algorithm, perturbations in proton characteristics were still observed. It is essential to be aware of the limits of the TPS in managing such heterogeneous combinations. It is recommended to perform more validation checks on heterogeneous combinations than on individual materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of spatial redistribution of heterogeneities in proton beam characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Manikandan Arjunan ,&nbsp;Dayananda Sharma Shamurailatpam ,&nbsp;Kartikeswar Ch Patro ,&nbsp;Suryakant Kaushik ,&nbsp;Ganapathy Krishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to investigate the fundamental properties of spot-scanning proton beams and compare them to Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, both with and without CT calibration, using spatially diverse combinations of materials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A heterogeneous phantom was created by spatially distributing titanium, wax, and thermocol to generate six scenarios of heterogeneous combinations. Proton pencil beams ranging in energy from 100 to 226.2 MeV were directed perpendicular to each heterogeneous combination, and the exit proton was measured using a Lynx scintillation detector and a Zebra Multi-Layer-Ionization-Chamber for depth dose and spot profile measurements, respectively. The identical measurement configuration was duplicated in the RayStation-TPS. The measured and simulated RayStation-MC beam characteristics were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that at 100 MeV, the mean standard deviation of spot size was 5.66 ± 0.27 mm, while at 226.2 MeV, it rapidly decreased to 3.37 ± 0.07 mm. The physical phantom showed a larger perturbation difference between measurement and MC simulation than the virtual phantom. MC overestimates ranges up to 1.5 % in virtual phantoms, but underestimates ranges up to 5 % in physical phantoms. Range perturbations over 1 mm occurred in 35.7 % of virtual phantom measurements and in 85.7 % of physical phantom measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite using a CT artefact reduction approach and an accurate Monte-Carlo dose calculation algorithm, perturbations in proton characteristics were still observed. It is essential to be aware of the limits of the TPS in managing such heterogeneous combinations. It is recommended to perform more validation checks on heterogeneous combinations than on individual materials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104882\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179724013504\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179724013504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是研究点扫描质子束的基本特性,并将其与蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟进行比较,在有和没有CT校准的情况下,使用空间不同的材料组合。方法:通过空间分布钛、蜡、热冷形成异质模体,生成六种异质组合场景。将能量在100 ~ 226.2 MeV之间的质子束垂直于每个非均相组合,分别使用Lynx闪烁探测器和Zebra多层电离室进行深度剂量和斑点剖面测量。在RayStation-TPS中复制了相同的测量配置。对实测和模拟的RayStation-MC光束特性进行了比较。结果:结果表明,在100 MeV时,光斑尺寸的平均标准差为5.66±0.27 mm,而在226.2 MeV时,光斑尺寸的平均标准差迅速减小到3.37±0.07 mm。物理体模比虚拟体模的摄动差更大。MC对虚拟幻影的高估可达1.5%,对物理幻影的低估可达5%。超过1毫米的范围扰动发生在35.7%的虚拟幻像测量和85.7%的物理幻像测量中。结论:尽管使用了CT伪影还原方法和精确的蒙特卡罗剂量计算算法,质子特征的微扰仍然被观察到。重要的是要意识到TPS在管理这种异构组合方面的局限性。建议对异质组合执行比单个材料更多的验证检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of spatial redistribution of heterogeneities in proton beam characteristics

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the fundamental properties of spot-scanning proton beams and compare them to Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, both with and without CT calibration, using spatially diverse combinations of materials.

Methods

A heterogeneous phantom was created by spatially distributing titanium, wax, and thermocol to generate six scenarios of heterogeneous combinations. Proton pencil beams ranging in energy from 100 to 226.2 MeV were directed perpendicular to each heterogeneous combination, and the exit proton was measured using a Lynx scintillation detector and a Zebra Multi-Layer-Ionization-Chamber for depth dose and spot profile measurements, respectively. The identical measurement configuration was duplicated in the RayStation-TPS. The measured and simulated RayStation-MC beam characteristics were compared.

Results

The results showed that at 100 MeV, the mean standard deviation of spot size was 5.66 ± 0.27 mm, while at 226.2 MeV, it rapidly decreased to 3.37 ± 0.07 mm. The physical phantom showed a larger perturbation difference between measurement and MC simulation than the virtual phantom. MC overestimates ranges up to 1.5 % in virtual phantoms, but underestimates ranges up to 5 % in physical phantoms. Range perturbations over 1 mm occurred in 35.7 % of virtual phantom measurements and in 85.7 % of physical phantom measurements.

Conclusions

Despite using a CT artefact reduction approach and an accurate Monte-Carlo dose calculation algorithm, perturbations in proton characteristics were still observed. It is essential to be aware of the limits of the TPS in managing such heterogeneous combinations. It is recommended to perform more validation checks on heterogeneous combinations than on individual materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
期刊最新文献
In vivo film detector for dose verification for IMRT/VMAT techniques European Federation of Organisations for medical physics (EFOMP) policy statement no 20: The role of medical physicists and medical physics experts in physiological measurement and related therapies. Noise power properties of a cone-beam CT scanner with unconventional scanning geometry A gender breakdown of unexpected benefits generated by work from home in STEM fields − A qualitative analysis of the WiMPBME Task Group survey A qualitative, quantitative and dosimetric evaluation of a machine learning-based automatic segmentation method in treatment planning for gastric cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1