助产士在社区环境中处理分娩和分娩期间紧急情况的经验:一项混合方法的系统评价。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Women and Birth Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101861
Rebecca Parker , Ethel E. Burns , Paul Carding , Rachel Rowe
{"title":"助产士在社区环境中处理分娩和分娩期间紧急情况的经验:一项混合方法的系统评价。","authors":"Rebecca Parker ,&nbsp;Ethel E. Burns ,&nbsp;Paul Carding ,&nbsp;Rachel Rowe","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>For women at low risk of complications during labour and birth, in the United Kingdom, planned birth in a ‘community’ setting (at home or a freestanding midwifery unit) is generally safe, and intrapartum emergencies are uncommon. Limited exposure may affect midwives’ experience of managing an emergency.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Identify and synthesise available evidence about midwives’ experiences of managing intrapartum emergencies during labour in a community setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-methods systematic review was undertaken, with searches conducted in April 2021 and February 2024. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they described midwives’ experience of managing intrapartum emergencies in high-income countries and if the setting(s) explicitly included community settings. Analytical themes were identified through integration of qualitative descriptive themes and a narrative summary of quantitative findings.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Ten papers were included, reporting seven studies carried out in the United Kingdom, United States of America, Australia and the Netherlands. Four inter-related themes were identified: unexpected and unpredictable nature of events; confidence and preparedness in skills and the birthing process; immediate and enduring emotional impact; and mediating effects of relationships and support.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><div>Limited research exists about midwives’ experience of emergencies in community settings and much of the evidence included in this review was from studies about traumatic births, where emergencies were a subset of those studied. Further research about midwives’ experience would be valuable to inform optimal training and support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"38 1","pages":"Article 101861"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midwives' experience of managing emergencies during labour and birth in a community setting: a mixed-methods systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Parker ,&nbsp;Ethel E. Burns ,&nbsp;Paul Carding ,&nbsp;Rachel Rowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>For women at low risk of complications during labour and birth, in the United Kingdom, planned birth in a ‘community’ setting (at home or a freestanding midwifery unit) is generally safe, and intrapartum emergencies are uncommon. Limited exposure may affect midwives’ experience of managing an emergency.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Identify and synthesise available evidence about midwives’ experiences of managing intrapartum emergencies during labour in a community setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-methods systematic review was undertaken, with searches conducted in April 2021 and February 2024. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they described midwives’ experience of managing intrapartum emergencies in high-income countries and if the setting(s) explicitly included community settings. Analytical themes were identified through integration of qualitative descriptive themes and a narrative summary of quantitative findings.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Ten papers were included, reporting seven studies carried out in the United Kingdom, United States of America, Australia and the Netherlands. Four inter-related themes were identified: unexpected and unpredictable nature of events; confidence and preparedness in skills and the birthing process; immediate and enduring emotional impact; and mediating effects of relationships and support.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><div>Limited research exists about midwives’ experience of emergencies in community settings and much of the evidence included in this review was from studies about traumatic births, where emergencies were a subset of those studied. Further research about midwives’ experience would be valuable to inform optimal training and support.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women and Birth\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women and Birth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224003214\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224003214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在英国,对于分娩和分娩期间并发症风险低的妇女,在“社区”环境(在家或独立的助产单位)进行计划生育通常是安全的,分娩时的紧急情况并不常见。有限的接触可能会影响助产士处理紧急情况的经验。目的:确定和综合现有的证据,助产士的经验管理分娩期间的紧急情况在社区设置。方法:采用混合方法进行系统评价,于2021年4月和2024年2月进行检索。如果研究描述了助产士在高收入国家处理产时紧急情况的经验,并且研究环境明确包括社区环境,则研究符合纳入条件。通过定性描述主题和定量结果的叙述性总结的整合来确定分析主题。研究结果:纳入了10篇论文,报告了在英国、美利坚合众国、澳大利亚和荷兰进行的7项研究。确定了四个相互关联的主题:意外和不可预测的事件性质;对技能和分娩过程的信心和准备;即时和持久的情感影响;以及人际关系和支持的中介效应。讨论和结论:关于助产士在社区环境中的紧急情况经验的研究有限,本综述中包含的大部分证据来自创伤性分娩的研究,其中紧急情况是研究的一个子集。对助产士经验的进一步研究将为最佳培训和支持提供有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Midwives' experience of managing emergencies during labour and birth in a community setting: a mixed-methods systematic review

Background

For women at low risk of complications during labour and birth, in the United Kingdom, planned birth in a ‘community’ setting (at home or a freestanding midwifery unit) is generally safe, and intrapartum emergencies are uncommon. Limited exposure may affect midwives’ experience of managing an emergency.

Aim

Identify and synthesise available evidence about midwives’ experiences of managing intrapartum emergencies during labour in a community setting.

Methods

A mixed-methods systematic review was undertaken, with searches conducted in April 2021 and February 2024. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they described midwives’ experience of managing intrapartum emergencies in high-income countries and if the setting(s) explicitly included community settings. Analytical themes were identified through integration of qualitative descriptive themes and a narrative summary of quantitative findings.

Findings

Ten papers were included, reporting seven studies carried out in the United Kingdom, United States of America, Australia and the Netherlands. Four inter-related themes were identified: unexpected and unpredictable nature of events; confidence and preparedness in skills and the birthing process; immediate and enduring emotional impact; and mediating effects of relationships and support.

Discussion and conclusions

Limited research exists about midwives’ experience of emergencies in community settings and much of the evidence included in this review was from studies about traumatic births, where emergencies were a subset of those studied. Further research about midwives’ experience would be valuable to inform optimal training and support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Women and Birth
Women and Birth NURSING-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
371
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews. Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.
期刊最新文献
Impact of baby-friendly hospital initiatives on breastfeeding outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis Enhancing Midwifery and lactation support for women in natural disasters and humanitarian crises A qualitative analysis of Australian midwifery students’ perspectives of Midwifery Practice Experience: Characteristics that enhance or diminish clinical education placements The continuity relationship makes caring for women with anxiety and depression easier, but it is also a heavy responsibility “They painted a rosy view, but I would have preferred to hear the reality”‐ Australian women’s experiences of antenatal breastfeeding education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1