图神经网络能否得到充分解释?一项调查

IF 23.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS ACM Computing Surveys Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1145/3711122
Xuyan Li, Jie Wang, Zheng Yan
{"title":"图神经网络能否得到充分解释?一项调查","authors":"Xuyan Li, Jie Wang, Zheng Yan","doi":"10.1145/3711122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To address the barrier caused by the black-box nature of Deep Learning (DL) for practical deployment, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged and is developing rapidly. While significant progress has been made in explanation techniques for DL models targeted to images and texts, research on explaining DL models for graph data is still in its infancy. As Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown superiority over various network analysis tasks, their explainability has also gained attention from both academia and industry. However, despite the increasing number of GNN explanation methods, there is currently neither a fine-grained taxonomy of them, nor a holistic set of evaluation criteria for quantitative and qualitative evaluation. To fill this gap, we conduct a comprehensive survey on existing explanation methods of GNNs in this paper. Specifically, we propose a novel four-dimensional taxonomy of GNN explanation methods and summarize evaluation criteria in terms of correctness, robustness, usability, understandability, and computational complexity. Based on the taxonomy and criteria, we thoroughly review the recent advances in GNN explanation methods and analyze their pros and cons. In the end, we identify a series of open issues and put forward future research directions to facilitate XAI research in the field of GNNs.","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Graph Neural Networks be Adequately Explained? A Survey\",\"authors\":\"Xuyan Li, Jie Wang, Zheng Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3711122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To address the barrier caused by the black-box nature of Deep Learning (DL) for practical deployment, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged and is developing rapidly. While significant progress has been made in explanation techniques for DL models targeted to images and texts, research on explaining DL models for graph data is still in its infancy. As Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown superiority over various network analysis tasks, their explainability has also gained attention from both academia and industry. However, despite the increasing number of GNN explanation methods, there is currently neither a fine-grained taxonomy of them, nor a holistic set of evaluation criteria for quantitative and qualitative evaluation. To fill this gap, we conduct a comprehensive survey on existing explanation methods of GNNs in this paper. Specifically, we propose a novel four-dimensional taxonomy of GNN explanation methods and summarize evaluation criteria in terms of correctness, robustness, usability, understandability, and computational complexity. Based on the taxonomy and criteria, we thoroughly review the recent advances in GNN explanation methods and analyze their pros and cons. In the end, we identify a series of open issues and put forward future research directions to facilitate XAI research in the field of GNNs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Computing Surveys\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Computing Surveys\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3711122\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3711122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解决深度学习(DL)的黑箱性质给实际部署带来的障碍,可解释人工智能(XAI)应运而生,并正在迅速发展。虽然针对图像和文本的深度学习模型的解释技术已取得重大进展,但针对图数据的深度学习模型的解释研究仍处于起步阶段。随着图形神经网络(GNN)在各种网络分析任务中显示出优越性,其可解释性也得到了学术界和工业界的关注。然而,尽管图神经网络的解释方法越来越多,但目前既没有对它们进行精细分类,也没有一套用于定量和定性评估的整体评价标准。为了填补这一空白,我们在本文中对现有的 GNN 解释方法进行了全面调查。具体来说,我们提出了一种新颖的 GNN 解释方法四维分类法,并从正确性、鲁棒性、可用性、可理解性和计算复杂性等方面总结了评价标准。基于该分类法和标准,我们全面回顾了 GNN 解释方法的最新进展,并分析了其利弊。最后,我们指出了一系列开放性问题,并提出了未来的研究方向,以促进 GNN 领域的 XAI 研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can Graph Neural Networks be Adequately Explained? A Survey
To address the barrier caused by the black-box nature of Deep Learning (DL) for practical deployment, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged and is developing rapidly. While significant progress has been made in explanation techniques for DL models targeted to images and texts, research on explaining DL models for graph data is still in its infancy. As Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown superiority over various network analysis tasks, their explainability has also gained attention from both academia and industry. However, despite the increasing number of GNN explanation methods, there is currently neither a fine-grained taxonomy of them, nor a holistic set of evaluation criteria for quantitative and qualitative evaluation. To fill this gap, we conduct a comprehensive survey on existing explanation methods of GNNs in this paper. Specifically, we propose a novel four-dimensional taxonomy of GNN explanation methods and summarize evaluation criteria in terms of correctness, robustness, usability, understandability, and computational complexity. Based on the taxonomy and criteria, we thoroughly review the recent advances in GNN explanation methods and analyze their pros and cons. In the end, we identify a series of open issues and put forward future research directions to facilitate XAI research in the field of GNNs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Computing Surveys
ACM Computing Surveys 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
33.20
自引率
0.60%
发文量
372
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods. ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.
期刊最新文献
ENDEMIC: End-to-End Network Disruptions - Examining Middleboxes, Issues, and Countermeasures - A Survey Making Sense of Big Data in Intelligent Transportation Systems: Current Trends, Challenges and Future Directions Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS) for Cloud, Fog and the Edge: State-of-the-Art Practices Natural Language Understanding and Inference with MLLM in Visual Question Answering: A Survey Knowledge Distillation on Graphs: A Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1