模拟澳大利亚人口的维生素D强化方案。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032
Eleanor Dunlop, Anita S Lawrence, Belinda Neo, Mairead Kiely, Anna Rangan, Caryl Nowson, Paul Adorno, Paul Atyeo, Edoardo Tescari, Daniel Russo-Batterham, Kim Doyle, Lucinda J Black
{"title":"模拟澳大利亚人口的维生素D强化方案。","authors":"Eleanor Dunlop, Anita S Lawrence, Belinda Neo, Mairead Kiely, Anna Rangan, Caryl Nowson, Paul Adorno, Paul Atyeo, Edoardo Tescari, Daniel Russo-Batterham, Kim Doyle, Lucinda J Black","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration <50 nmol/L) is prevalent in Australia, and 95% of Australians have been estimated to have low vitamin D intake (mean range 1.8-3.2 μg/d). Increasing the dietary supply of vitamin D could improve vitamin D status across the population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We modeled 4 vitamin D fortification scenarios to support useful and safe fortification strategies for Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used cross-sectional food consumption data from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 12,153 aged 2-85 y) and analytical food composition data. Scenario 1 modeled the systematic addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods for which vitamin D fortification is mandated (edible oil spreads) or optional (dairy products/plant-based alternatives, formulated beverages, permitted ready-to-eat breakfast cereals). Scenarios 2-4 modeled the addition of vitamin D to edible oil spreads and fluid milk/alternatives at higher concentrations than permitted and the addition of the maximum permitted amount to scenario 2, dairy products/alternatives other than fluid milk, formulated beverages; scenario 3: scenario 2 plus eligible ready-to-eat breakfast cereals; scenario 4: scenario 3 plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). We used the National Cancer Institute method to model the usual intake of vitamin D for each scenario by sex and age group. Dietary adequacy and safety were assessed using the North American Estimated Average Requirement (10 μg/d) and the Australian upper level of intake (80 μg/d).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under scenarios 1-4, respectively, the projected proportion of Australians with vitamin D intake <10 μg/d was 80%, 84%, 73%, and 60%. No participant exceeded the upper level of intake under any scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A systematic fortification strategy could support a nutritionally meaningful improvement in vitamin D intake across the Australian population. An optimal strategy would require amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Vitamin D Fortification Scenarios for the Australian Population.\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor Dunlop, Anita S Lawrence, Belinda Neo, Mairead Kiely, Anna Rangan, Caryl Nowson, Paul Adorno, Paul Atyeo, Edoardo Tescari, Daniel Russo-Batterham, Kim Doyle, Lucinda J Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration <50 nmol/L) is prevalent in Australia, and 95% of Australians have been estimated to have low vitamin D intake (mean range 1.8-3.2 μg/d). Increasing the dietary supply of vitamin D could improve vitamin D status across the population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We modeled 4 vitamin D fortification scenarios to support useful and safe fortification strategies for Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used cross-sectional food consumption data from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 12,153 aged 2-85 y) and analytical food composition data. Scenario 1 modeled the systematic addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods for which vitamin D fortification is mandated (edible oil spreads) or optional (dairy products/plant-based alternatives, formulated beverages, permitted ready-to-eat breakfast cereals). Scenarios 2-4 modeled the addition of vitamin D to edible oil spreads and fluid milk/alternatives at higher concentrations than permitted and the addition of the maximum permitted amount to scenario 2, dairy products/alternatives other than fluid milk, formulated beverages; scenario 3: scenario 2 plus eligible ready-to-eat breakfast cereals; scenario 4: scenario 3 plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). We used the National Cancer Institute method to model the usual intake of vitamin D for each scenario by sex and age group. Dietary adequacy and safety were assessed using the North American Estimated Average Requirement (10 μg/d) and the Australian upper level of intake (80 μg/d).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under scenarios 1-4, respectively, the projected proportion of Australians with vitamin D intake <10 μg/d was 80%, 84%, 73%, and 60%. No participant exceeded the upper level of intake under any scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A systematic fortification strategy could support a nutritionally meaningful improvement in vitamin D intake across the Australian population. An optimal strategy would require amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低维生素D状态(循环25-羟基维生素D浓度)目的:我们模拟了四种维生素D强化方案,以支持澳大利亚有效和安全的强化策略。方法:我们使用2011-2012年全国营养和体育活动调查(n = 12,153 2-85岁)的横断面食品消费数据和分析食品成分数据。情景1模拟了在所有强制强化维生素D的食品(食用油涂抹)或可选食品(乳制品/植物性替代品、配方饮料、允许的即食早餐谷物(RTEBC))中系统地添加最大允许量的维生素D。情景2-4模拟了在食用油涂抹剂和液态奶/替代品中以高于允许的浓度添加维生素D,以及在下列情景中添加最大允许量:情景2)液态奶、配方饮料以外的乳制品/替代品;方案3)方案2加上符合条件的RTEBC;方案4)方案3加上面包(澳大利亚不允许添加维生素D)。我们使用了国家癌症研究所的方法,按性别和年龄组对每种情况下维生素D的通常摄入量进行了建模。采用北美估计平均需取量(EAR, 10 μg/d)和澳大利亚最高摄入量(UL, 80 μg/d)评估膳食充分性和安全性。结果:分别在情景1-4下,澳大利亚人摄入维生素D的预计比例结论:系统的强化策略可以支持整个澳大利亚人口维生素D摄入量的有营养意义的改善。最理想的策略是修改澳大利亚新西兰食品标准法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling Vitamin D Fortification Scenarios for the Australian Population.

Background: Low vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration <50 nmol/L) is prevalent in Australia, and 95% of Australians have been estimated to have low vitamin D intake (mean range 1.8-3.2 μg/d). Increasing the dietary supply of vitamin D could improve vitamin D status across the population.

Objectives: We modeled 4 vitamin D fortification scenarios to support useful and safe fortification strategies for Australia.

Methods: We used cross-sectional food consumption data from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 12,153 aged 2-85 y) and analytical food composition data. Scenario 1 modeled the systematic addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods for which vitamin D fortification is mandated (edible oil spreads) or optional (dairy products/plant-based alternatives, formulated beverages, permitted ready-to-eat breakfast cereals). Scenarios 2-4 modeled the addition of vitamin D to edible oil spreads and fluid milk/alternatives at higher concentrations than permitted and the addition of the maximum permitted amount to scenario 2, dairy products/alternatives other than fluid milk, formulated beverages; scenario 3: scenario 2 plus eligible ready-to-eat breakfast cereals; scenario 4: scenario 3 plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). We used the National Cancer Institute method to model the usual intake of vitamin D for each scenario by sex and age group. Dietary adequacy and safety were assessed using the North American Estimated Average Requirement (10 μg/d) and the Australian upper level of intake (80 μg/d).

Results: Under scenarios 1-4, respectively, the projected proportion of Australians with vitamin D intake <10 μg/d was 80%, 84%, 73%, and 60%. No participant exceeded the upper level of intake under any scenario.

Conclusions: A systematic fortification strategy could support a nutritionally meaningful improvement in vitamin D intake across the Australian population. An optimal strategy would require amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
期刊最新文献
Implications of changes in human milk concentration across the first 6 months of life? Letter to the Editor. Retinol Isotope Dilution Testing in Population-based Surveys: Are We There Yet? The muscle building potential of vegan eating for older folks. Water as a source of iodine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1