Eleanor Dunlop, Anita S Lawrence, Belinda Neo, Mairead Kiely, Anna Rangan, Caryl Nowson, Paul Adorno, Paul Atyeo, Edoardo Tescari, Daniel Russo-Batterham, Kim Doyle, Lucinda J Black
{"title":"模拟澳大利亚人口的维生素D强化方案。","authors":"Eleanor Dunlop, Anita S Lawrence, Belinda Neo, Mairead Kiely, Anna Rangan, Caryl Nowson, Paul Adorno, Paul Atyeo, Edoardo Tescari, Daniel Russo-Batterham, Kim Doyle, Lucinda J Black","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration <50 nmol/L) is prevalent in Australia, and 95% of Australians have been estimated to have low vitamin D intake (mean range 1.8-3.2 μg/d). Increasing the dietary supply of vitamin D could improve vitamin D status across the population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We modeled 4 vitamin D fortification scenarios to support useful and safe fortification strategies for Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used cross-sectional food consumption data from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 12,153 aged 2-85 y) and analytical food composition data. Scenario 1 modeled the systematic addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods for which vitamin D fortification is mandated (edible oil spreads) or optional (dairy products/plant-based alternatives, formulated beverages, permitted ready-to-eat breakfast cereals). Scenarios 2-4 modeled the addition of vitamin D to edible oil spreads and fluid milk/alternatives at higher concentrations than permitted and the addition of the maximum permitted amount to scenario 2, dairy products/alternatives other than fluid milk, formulated beverages; scenario 3: scenario 2 plus eligible ready-to-eat breakfast cereals; scenario 4: scenario 3 plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). We used the National Cancer Institute method to model the usual intake of vitamin D for each scenario by sex and age group. Dietary adequacy and safety were assessed using the North American Estimated Average Requirement (10 μg/d) and the Australian upper level of intake (80 μg/d).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under scenarios 1-4, respectively, the projected proportion of Australians with vitamin D intake <10 μg/d was 80%, 84%, 73%, and 60%. No participant exceeded the upper level of intake under any scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A systematic fortification strategy could support a nutritionally meaningful improvement in vitamin D intake across the Australian population. An optimal strategy would require amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Vitamin D Fortification Scenarios for the Australian Population.\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor Dunlop, Anita S Lawrence, Belinda Neo, Mairead Kiely, Anna Rangan, Caryl Nowson, Paul Adorno, Paul Atyeo, Edoardo Tescari, Daniel Russo-Batterham, Kim Doyle, Lucinda J Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration <50 nmol/L) is prevalent in Australia, and 95% of Australians have been estimated to have low vitamin D intake (mean range 1.8-3.2 μg/d). Increasing the dietary supply of vitamin D could improve vitamin D status across the population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We modeled 4 vitamin D fortification scenarios to support useful and safe fortification strategies for Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used cross-sectional food consumption data from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 12,153 aged 2-85 y) and analytical food composition data. Scenario 1 modeled the systematic addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods for which vitamin D fortification is mandated (edible oil spreads) or optional (dairy products/plant-based alternatives, formulated beverages, permitted ready-to-eat breakfast cereals). Scenarios 2-4 modeled the addition of vitamin D to edible oil spreads and fluid milk/alternatives at higher concentrations than permitted and the addition of the maximum permitted amount to scenario 2, dairy products/alternatives other than fluid milk, formulated beverages; scenario 3: scenario 2 plus eligible ready-to-eat breakfast cereals; scenario 4: scenario 3 plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). We used the National Cancer Institute method to model the usual intake of vitamin D for each scenario by sex and age group. Dietary adequacy and safety were assessed using the North American Estimated Average Requirement (10 μg/d) and the Australian upper level of intake (80 μg/d).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under scenarios 1-4, respectively, the projected proportion of Australians with vitamin D intake <10 μg/d was 80%, 84%, 73%, and 60%. No participant exceeded the upper level of intake under any scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A systematic fortification strategy could support a nutritionally meaningful improvement in vitamin D intake across the Australian population. An optimal strategy would require amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modeling Vitamin D Fortification Scenarios for the Australian Population.
Background: Low vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration <50 nmol/L) is prevalent in Australia, and 95% of Australians have been estimated to have low vitamin D intake (mean range 1.8-3.2 μg/d). Increasing the dietary supply of vitamin D could improve vitamin D status across the population.
Objectives: We modeled 4 vitamin D fortification scenarios to support useful and safe fortification strategies for Australia.
Methods: We used cross-sectional food consumption data from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 12,153 aged 2-85 y) and analytical food composition data. Scenario 1 modeled the systematic addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods for which vitamin D fortification is mandated (edible oil spreads) or optional (dairy products/plant-based alternatives, formulated beverages, permitted ready-to-eat breakfast cereals). Scenarios 2-4 modeled the addition of vitamin D to edible oil spreads and fluid milk/alternatives at higher concentrations than permitted and the addition of the maximum permitted amount to scenario 2, dairy products/alternatives other than fluid milk, formulated beverages; scenario 3: scenario 2 plus eligible ready-to-eat breakfast cereals; scenario 4: scenario 3 plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). We used the National Cancer Institute method to model the usual intake of vitamin D for each scenario by sex and age group. Dietary adequacy and safety were assessed using the North American Estimated Average Requirement (10 μg/d) and the Australian upper level of intake (80 μg/d).
Results: Under scenarios 1-4, respectively, the projected proportion of Australians with vitamin D intake <10 μg/d was 80%, 84%, 73%, and 60%. No participant exceeded the upper level of intake under any scenario.
Conclusions: A systematic fortification strategy could support a nutritionally meaningful improvement in vitamin D intake across the Australian population. An optimal strategy would require amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.