{"title":"维多利亚时代的自然治疗哲学作为浪漫自然主义和实验室医学的调和:E.W.莱恩(1823-89)卫生医学的案例。","authors":"Min Bae","doi":"10.1017/mdh.2024.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article primarily concentrates on the theoretical and intellectual dimensions of nature cure, particularly efforts to revive it during the second half of the nineteenth century. Little is known about specific medical professionals or theories concerning the Victorian philosophy of nature cure, although this philosophy is mentioned in general terms in studies on alternative medicine and hygiene. This article illuminates a Victorian nature cure philosophy through the works of Edward W. Lane (1823-1889). As a physician and hydropathist, Lane aspired to create a new form of medical system, 'hygienic medicine', seeking answers to the questions 'What is disease?' and 'What is medicine?' throughout his career. Lane was among many physicians interested in nature's healing power during his time. However, few undertook as thorough a theorisation of nature cure philosophy as Lane did in the latter half of the nineteenth century, a period that presented unprecedented challenges in reconciling medicine with nature. This study explores the subtle nuances of the concepts that Lane actively used in his theoretical explanations, including 'nature', 'laws of health' and 'vital force', interpreting his efforts as a reconciliation between Romantic naturalism and laboratory medicine. The aim of this study is not to re-evaluate the significance of Lane's medical theory itself. It rather uses Lane as a lens to reveal the intricacies of Victorian nature cure philosophy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18275,"journal":{"name":"Medical History","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Victorian nature cure philosophy as a reconciliation of Romantic Naturalism and laboratory medicine: the case of E.W. Lane's (1823-89) hygienic medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Min Bae\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/mdh.2024.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article primarily concentrates on the theoretical and intellectual dimensions of nature cure, particularly efforts to revive it during the second half of the nineteenth century. Little is known about specific medical professionals or theories concerning the Victorian philosophy of nature cure, although this philosophy is mentioned in general terms in studies on alternative medicine and hygiene. This article illuminates a Victorian nature cure philosophy through the works of Edward W. Lane (1823-1889). As a physician and hydropathist, Lane aspired to create a new form of medical system, 'hygienic medicine', seeking answers to the questions 'What is disease?' and 'What is medicine?' throughout his career. Lane was among many physicians interested in nature's healing power during his time. However, few undertook as thorough a theorisation of nature cure philosophy as Lane did in the latter half of the nineteenth century, a period that presented unprecedented challenges in reconciling medicine with nature. This study explores the subtle nuances of the concepts that Lane actively used in his theoretical explanations, including 'nature', 'laws of health' and 'vital force', interpreting his efforts as a reconciliation between Romantic naturalism and laboratory medicine. The aim of this study is not to re-evaluate the significance of Lane's medical theory itself. It rather uses Lane as a lens to reveal the intricacies of Victorian nature cure philosophy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical History\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2024.42\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2024.42","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文主要关注自然疗法的理论和知识层面,特别是在19世纪下半叶复兴它的努力。人们对维多利亚时代自然疗法哲学的具体医学专业人士或理论知之甚少,尽管这种哲学在替代医学和卫生研究中被广泛提及。本文通过爱德华·w·莱恩(Edward W. Lane, 1823-1889)的作品阐释了维多利亚时代的自然疗法哲学。作为一名内科医生和水疗师,莱恩渴望创造一种新的医疗体系——“卫生医学”,寻求“什么是疾病?”和“什么是医学?”在他的职业生涯中。在他那个时代,莱恩是许多对大自然的治愈能力感兴趣的医生之一。然而,很少有人像莱恩在19世纪下半叶那样,对自然治疗哲学进行了彻底的理论化,这一时期在调和医学与自然方面面临着前所未有的挑战。本研究探讨了莱恩在他的理论解释中积极使用的概念的细微差别,包括“自然”、“健康法则”和“生命力”,将他的努力解释为浪漫自然主义和实验室医学之间的和解。本研究的目的不是重新评价莱恩医学理论本身的意义。而是用莱恩作为镜头来揭示维多利亚时代自然疗法哲学的复杂性。
A Victorian nature cure philosophy as a reconciliation of Romantic Naturalism and laboratory medicine: the case of E.W. Lane's (1823-89) hygienic medicine.
This article primarily concentrates on the theoretical and intellectual dimensions of nature cure, particularly efforts to revive it during the second half of the nineteenth century. Little is known about specific medical professionals or theories concerning the Victorian philosophy of nature cure, although this philosophy is mentioned in general terms in studies on alternative medicine and hygiene. This article illuminates a Victorian nature cure philosophy through the works of Edward W. Lane (1823-1889). As a physician and hydropathist, Lane aspired to create a new form of medical system, 'hygienic medicine', seeking answers to the questions 'What is disease?' and 'What is medicine?' throughout his career. Lane was among many physicians interested in nature's healing power during his time. However, few undertook as thorough a theorisation of nature cure philosophy as Lane did in the latter half of the nineteenth century, a period that presented unprecedented challenges in reconciling medicine with nature. This study explores the subtle nuances of the concepts that Lane actively used in his theoretical explanations, including 'nature', 'laws of health' and 'vital force', interpreting his efforts as a reconciliation between Romantic naturalism and laboratory medicine. The aim of this study is not to re-evaluate the significance of Lane's medical theory itself. It rather uses Lane as a lens to reveal the intricacies of Victorian nature cure philosophy.
期刊介绍:
Medical History is a refereed journal devoted to all aspects of the history of medicine and health, with the goal of broadening and deepening the understanding of the field, in the widest sense, by historical studies of the highest quality. It is also the journal of the European Association for the History of Medicine and Health. The membership of the Editorial Board, which includes senior members of the EAHMH, reflects the commitment to the finest international standards in refereeing of submitted papers and the reviewing of books. The journal publishes in English, but welcomes submissions from scholars for whom English is not a first language; language and copy-editing assistance will be provided wherever possible.