Q2 Dentistry Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_7_24
Arya Brahmanta, Meralda Rossy Syahdinda, Hansen Kurniawan, Anand Marya, Deepak Chandrasekharan
{"title":"Facialprofile determination using a novel face analyzer orthodontic mobile application.","authors":"Arya Brahmanta, Meralda Rossy Syahdinda, Hansen Kurniawan, Anand Marya, Deepak Chandrasekharan","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_7_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To find out the difference, the type of facial profile, and facial asymmetry between manual methods and mobile application, which is named the face analyzer orthodontic application. Facial profiles can be determined from the side of the face, categorized into three types: straight, convex, and concave profiles. Facial asymmetry refers to the imbalance between facial components concerning size, shape, and opposing positions of planes, lines, or points.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The research design was a cross-sectional study design using extra oral patient photographs who were treated in Orthodontic Department of Nala Husada Dental Hospital, Surabaya. The technique used was simple random sampling. The number of samples obtained based on inclusion and exclusion criteria was 37 patients, ranged 9-15 years old. The facial profile and asymmetry were determined from extra oral photos before objectively analyzed and processed in face analyzer application by comparing with the manual technique. Wilcoxon test, used to determine the significance value of facial profiles and the facial asymmetry, was analyzed by McNemar's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Testing on two variables with two different treatment groups obtained <i>P</i> > 0.05. The Wilcoxon test result (<i>P</i> = 0.157) indicates there is no significant difference, and the McNemar test result (<i>P</i> = 0.375) indicates there was no significant difference in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of determining the facial profile and facial asymmetry showed no difference between manual and face analyzer orthodontic mobile applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_7_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的找出手动方法和移动应用程序(被命名为面部分析仪正畸应用程序)之间的差异、面部轮廓类型和面部不对称。脸部轮廓可从脸部侧面确定,分为三种类型:直脸、凸脸和凹脸。面部不对称是指面部各组成部分在大小、形状以及平面、线条或点的相对位置方面的不平衡:研究设计为横断面研究设计,使用在泗水 Nala Husada 牙科医院正畸科接受治疗的口腔外患者照片。采用的技术是简单随机抽样。根据纳入和排除标准获得的样本数量为 37 名患者,年龄在 9-15 岁之间。面部轮廓和不对称是通过口腔外照片确定的,然后在面部分析仪应用程序中进行客观分析和处理,并与手动技术进行比较。Wilcoxon检验用于确定面部轮廓和面部不对称的显著性值,McNemar检验用于分析:结果:对两个不同治疗组的两个变量进行检验,P>0.05。Wilcoxon 检验结果(P = 0.157)表明两组间无显著差异,McNemar 检验结果(P = 0.375)表明两组间无显著差异:结论:在确定面部轮廓和面部不对称方面,手动和面部分析仪正畸移动应用的结果没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facialprofile determination using a novel face analyzer orthodontic mobile application.

Objectives: To find out the difference, the type of facial profile, and facial asymmetry between manual methods and mobile application, which is named the face analyzer orthodontic application. Facial profiles can be determined from the side of the face, categorized into three types: straight, convex, and concave profiles. Facial asymmetry refers to the imbalance between facial components concerning size, shape, and opposing positions of planes, lines, or points.

Materials and methods: The research design was a cross-sectional study design using extra oral patient photographs who were treated in Orthodontic Department of Nala Husada Dental Hospital, Surabaya. The technique used was simple random sampling. The number of samples obtained based on inclusion and exclusion criteria was 37 patients, ranged 9-15 years old. The facial profile and asymmetry were determined from extra oral photos before objectively analyzed and processed in face analyzer application by comparing with the manual technique. Wilcoxon test, used to determine the significance value of facial profiles and the facial asymmetry, was analyzed by McNemar's test.

Results: Testing on two variables with two different treatment groups obtained P > 0.05. The Wilcoxon test result (P = 0.157) indicates there is no significant difference, and the McNemar test result (P = 0.375) indicates there was no significant difference in the two groups.

Conclusions: The results of determining the facial profile and facial asymmetry showed no difference between manual and face analyzer orthodontic mobile applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating the characteristics of the mandibular canal in cone beam CT. Orthodontic practice marketing: The orthodontist and laypeople's perspective. Role of physical and dentofacial features in bullying among United Arab Emirates schoolchildren and its impact on school performance - A cross-sectional study. Quantitative assessment of orthodontic treatments performed by graduate orthodontic students of an International School of Dentistry. Skeletal and dental effects of skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant devices during class II malocclusion treatment: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1