翻转课堂教学中学生对生物化学的理解。

IF 6.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Smart Learning Environments Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1186/s40561-024-00356-z
Edward N Harris, Evan A Schroder, Teryn J Berks
{"title":"翻转课堂教学中学生对生物化学的理解。","authors":"Edward N Harris, Evan A Schroder, Teryn J Berks","doi":"10.1186/s40561-024-00356-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concept-heavy courses such as Biochemistry in life and physical science curricula are challenging for many college-aged students. It is easy for students to disengage in a lecture and not learn the subject matter while in class. To improve student learning <i>and</i> participation, we employed a flipped format for the first half of the course and compared learning outcomes and attitudes with the traditional lecture in the second half of the course. The experimental course was an upper-level biochemistry course taken primarily by juniors (49%), seniors (40%), and some graduate students (10%) at the college level. Our results indicate that lower-performing students academically benefited from the flipped format (twofold lower failure rate as compared to previous years), whereas, there was no change with higher performing students when comparing student grades from previous courses. Academic assessments were derived from exams, quizzes, in-class activity/participation, and out-of-class homework. Participation and overall satisfaction with the course was significantly much higher in the flipped format (88% of students) than in the traditional lecture (< 10%) for all students. In-class activities in both faculty preparation and execution were crucial to the success of the flipped format. Our conclusions are that the flipped pedagogy is better for the reinforcement of difficult concepts for struggling students (95% students in agreement) and merits higher participation than the traditional lecture. Two-way communication between instructor and students is encouraged and enhanced with in-class activities and case studies. Due to the success of this project and in agreement with ~ 75% of the students, the entire course will be flipped going forward.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40561-024-00356-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":21774,"journal":{"name":"Smart Learning Environments","volume":"11 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student comprehension of biochemistry in a flipped classroom format.\",\"authors\":\"Edward N Harris, Evan A Schroder, Teryn J Berks\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40561-024-00356-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Concept-heavy courses such as Biochemistry in life and physical science curricula are challenging for many college-aged students. It is easy for students to disengage in a lecture and not learn the subject matter while in class. To improve student learning <i>and</i> participation, we employed a flipped format for the first half of the course and compared learning outcomes and attitudes with the traditional lecture in the second half of the course. The experimental course was an upper-level biochemistry course taken primarily by juniors (49%), seniors (40%), and some graduate students (10%) at the college level. Our results indicate that lower-performing students academically benefited from the flipped format (twofold lower failure rate as compared to previous years), whereas, there was no change with higher performing students when comparing student grades from previous courses. Academic assessments were derived from exams, quizzes, in-class activity/participation, and out-of-class homework. Participation and overall satisfaction with the course was significantly much higher in the flipped format (88% of students) than in the traditional lecture (< 10%) for all students. In-class activities in both faculty preparation and execution were crucial to the success of the flipped format. Our conclusions are that the flipped pedagogy is better for the reinforcement of difficult concepts for struggling students (95% students in agreement) and merits higher participation than the traditional lecture. Two-way communication between instructor and students is encouraged and enhanced with in-class activities and case studies. Due to the success of this project and in agreement with ~ 75% of the students, the entire course will be flipped going forward.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40561-024-00356-z.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart Learning Environments\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698299/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart Learning Environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00356-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Learning Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00356-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

概念重的课程,如生命生物化学和物理科学课程对许多大学生来说是具有挑战性的。学生们很容易在课堂上脱离课堂,不去学习课程内容。为了提高学生的学习和参与,我们在课程的前半部分采用了翻转的形式,并在课程的后半部分将学习成果和态度与传统的讲座进行了比较。实验课程是一门高级生物化学课程,主要由大三学生(49%)、大四学生(40%)和一些研究生(10%)参加。我们的研究结果表明,成绩较差的学生在学业上受益于翻转教学模式(与前几年相比,不合格率降低了两倍),然而,在比较以前课程的学生成绩时,表现较好的学生没有任何变化。学术评估来源于考试、小测验、课堂活动/参与和课外作业。学生对翻转授课的参与度和总体满意度明显高于传统授课(补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,下载地址:10.1186/s40561-024-00356-z)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Student comprehension of biochemistry in a flipped classroom format.

Concept-heavy courses such as Biochemistry in life and physical science curricula are challenging for many college-aged students. It is easy for students to disengage in a lecture and not learn the subject matter while in class. To improve student learning and participation, we employed a flipped format for the first half of the course and compared learning outcomes and attitudes with the traditional lecture in the second half of the course. The experimental course was an upper-level biochemistry course taken primarily by juniors (49%), seniors (40%), and some graduate students (10%) at the college level. Our results indicate that lower-performing students academically benefited from the flipped format (twofold lower failure rate as compared to previous years), whereas, there was no change with higher performing students when comparing student grades from previous courses. Academic assessments were derived from exams, quizzes, in-class activity/participation, and out-of-class homework. Participation and overall satisfaction with the course was significantly much higher in the flipped format (88% of students) than in the traditional lecture (< 10%) for all students. In-class activities in both faculty preparation and execution were crucial to the success of the flipped format. Our conclusions are that the flipped pedagogy is better for the reinforcement of difficult concepts for struggling students (95% students in agreement) and merits higher participation than the traditional lecture. Two-way communication between instructor and students is encouraged and enhanced with in-class activities and case studies. Due to the success of this project and in agreement with ~ 75% of the students, the entire course will be flipped going forward.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40561-024-00356-z.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Smart Learning Environments
Smart Learning Environments Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
The role of telecollaboration in English language teacher education: a systematic review Revealing the true potential and prospects of augmented reality in education Designing and evaluating an augmented reality system for an engineering drawing course Student comprehension of biochemistry in a flipped classroom format. Challenges and opportunities of AI in inclusive education: a case study of data-enhanced active reading in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1