{"title":"坚持口腔器械治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者持续气道正压衰竭。","authors":"Akio Himejima, Maho Kono, Keishi Wada, Liqin Wang, Ayako Masago, Kentaro Okuno","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to determine the continuation and success rates of oral appliance (OA) therapy for patients in whom continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy failed. The secondary aim was to identify predictive factors for the long-term use of OA in patients with CPAP failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 81 patients who failed with CPAP use were included in this study. Patients who had been using OA for more than 1 year at follow-up visits were assigned to Group S, whereas those who discontinued OA or were lost to follow-up within 1 year were assigned to Group D. We investigated the continuation and success rates of OA therapy, as well as predictive factors for its long-term use for those with CPAP failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 81 patients, 60 were in Group S and 21 were in Group D; 74.0% of patients with CPAP failure continued OA therapy for more than 1 year. The apnea-hypopnea index was reduced from 41.3±21.7/h to 12.4±6.5/h with OA therapy. The only significant predictor of long-term OA use in patients with CPAP failure was awareness of the effectiveness of OA therapy after 1 month (P = 0.003, odds ratio: 9.731, 95% confidence interval: 2.146-44.119).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who recognized the effectiveness of OA treatment in the early stages were more likely to continue using OA therapy long-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":16887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prosthodontic research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with continuous positive airway pressure failure.\",\"authors\":\"Akio Himejima, Maho Kono, Keishi Wada, Liqin Wang, Ayako Masago, Kentaro Okuno\",\"doi\":\"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to determine the continuation and success rates of oral appliance (OA) therapy for patients in whom continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy failed. The secondary aim was to identify predictive factors for the long-term use of OA in patients with CPAP failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 81 patients who failed with CPAP use were included in this study. Patients who had been using OA for more than 1 year at follow-up visits were assigned to Group S, whereas those who discontinued OA or were lost to follow-up within 1 year were assigned to Group D. We investigated the continuation and success rates of OA therapy, as well as predictive factors for its long-term use for those with CPAP failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 81 patients, 60 were in Group S and 21 were in Group D; 74.0% of patients with CPAP failure continued OA therapy for more than 1 year. The apnea-hypopnea index was reduced from 41.3±21.7/h to 12.4±6.5/h with OA therapy. The only significant predictor of long-term OA use in patients with CPAP failure was awareness of the effectiveness of OA therapy after 1 month (P = 0.003, odds ratio: 9.731, 95% confidence interval: 2.146-44.119).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who recognized the effectiveness of OA treatment in the early stages were more likely to continue using OA therapy long-term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of prosthodontic research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of prosthodontic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00138\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prosthodontic research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adherence to oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with continuous positive airway pressure failure.
Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to determine the continuation and success rates of oral appliance (OA) therapy for patients in whom continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy failed. The secondary aim was to identify predictive factors for the long-term use of OA in patients with CPAP failure.
Methods: A total of 81 patients who failed with CPAP use were included in this study. Patients who had been using OA for more than 1 year at follow-up visits were assigned to Group S, whereas those who discontinued OA or were lost to follow-up within 1 year were assigned to Group D. We investigated the continuation and success rates of OA therapy, as well as predictive factors for its long-term use for those with CPAP failure.
Results: Of the 81 patients, 60 were in Group S and 21 were in Group D; 74.0% of patients with CPAP failure continued OA therapy for more than 1 year. The apnea-hypopnea index was reduced from 41.3±21.7/h to 12.4±6.5/h with OA therapy. The only significant predictor of long-term OA use in patients with CPAP failure was awareness of the effectiveness of OA therapy after 1 month (P = 0.003, odds ratio: 9.731, 95% confidence interval: 2.146-44.119).
Conclusions: Patients who recognized the effectiveness of OA treatment in the early stages were more likely to continue using OA therapy long-term.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Prosthodontic Research is published 4 times annually, in January, April, July, and October, under supervision by the Editorial Board of Japan Prosthodontic Society, which selects all materials submitted for publication.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research originated as an official journal of Japan Prosthodontic Society. It has recently developed a long-range plan to become the most prestigious Asian journal of dental research regarding all aspects of oral and occlusal rehabilitation, fixed/removable prosthodontics, oral implantology and applied oral biology and physiology. The Journal will cover all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to reestablish subjective and objective harmonious oral aesthetics and function.
The most-targeted topics:
1) Clinical Epidemiology and Prosthodontics
2) Fixed/Removable Prosthodontics
3) Oral Implantology
4) Prosthodontics-Related Biosciences (Regenerative Medicine, Bone Biology, Mechanobiology, Microbiology/Immunology)
5) Oral Physiology and Biomechanics (Masticating and Swallowing Function, Parafunction, e.g., bruxism)
6) Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)
7) Adhesive Dentistry / Dental Materials / Aesthetic Dentistry
8) Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Dysphagia Rehabilitation
9) Digital Dentistry
Prosthodontic treatment may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, of orofacial trauma, or of a variety of dental and oral diseases and orofacial pain conditions.
Reviews, Original articles, technical procedure and case reports can be submitted. Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Journal of Prosthodontic Research are welcomed.