P S Gopinath Thilak, Tanaya Mande, Vinay Kumar J Rajendra, H L Kishan Prasad, Padmaraj J Hegde
{"title":"口腔鳞状细胞癌的放射学、宏观和微观浸润深度的相关性:一项使用增强对比计算机断层扫描的前瞻性研究。","authors":"P S Gopinath Thilak, Tanaya Mande, Vinay Kumar J Rajendra, H L Kishan Prasad, Padmaraj J Hegde","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depth of invasion (DOI) significantly influences prognosis and treatment strategies in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Accurate preoperative imaging, such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), alongside postoperative histopathological evaluations, aids in determining DOI. This study evaluates the correlation between radiological DOI (rDOI), macroscopic DOI (PDOI), and microscopic DOI (pDOI) in OSCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 54 OSCC patients from April 2022 to November 2023. rDOI was assessed using preoperative CECT, while PDOI and pDOI were measured through histopathological examination of resected specimens. Spearman correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between DOI measurements, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong correlations were found between rDOI and PDOI (r = 0.713), rDOI and pDOI (r = 0.688), and PDOI and pDOI (r = 0.897, p < 0.001 for all). CECT overestimated DOI in T1 and T2 lesions, particularly in ulcerative tumors. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences of 1.86 mm (rDOI-PDOI) and 3.3 mm (rDOI-pDOI). Higher correlations were observed in the presence of perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and worst pattern of invasion 5 (WPOI 5), with r values up to 0.948 (rDOI-PDOI) and 0.980 (PDOI-pDOI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While rDOI correlates strongly with pathological DOI, overestimations in smaller and ulcerative lesions necessitate cautious interpretation. Pathological risk factors, including PNI, LVI, and WPOI 5, were associated with greater DOI and enhanced agreement between radiological and pathological assessments. Overall, CECT is a reliable tool for preoperative evaluation of DOI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"161 ","pages":"107159"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between radiological, macroscopic and microscopic depth of invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study using contrast-enhanced computed tomography.\",\"authors\":\"P S Gopinath Thilak, Tanaya Mande, Vinay Kumar J Rajendra, H L Kishan Prasad, Padmaraj J Hegde\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depth of invasion (DOI) significantly influences prognosis and treatment strategies in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Accurate preoperative imaging, such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), alongside postoperative histopathological evaluations, aids in determining DOI. This study evaluates the correlation between radiological DOI (rDOI), macroscopic DOI (PDOI), and microscopic DOI (pDOI) in OSCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 54 OSCC patients from April 2022 to November 2023. rDOI was assessed using preoperative CECT, while PDOI and pDOI were measured through histopathological examination of resected specimens. Spearman correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between DOI measurements, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong correlations were found between rDOI and PDOI (r = 0.713), rDOI and pDOI (r = 0.688), and PDOI and pDOI (r = 0.897, p < 0.001 for all). CECT overestimated DOI in T1 and T2 lesions, particularly in ulcerative tumors. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences of 1.86 mm (rDOI-PDOI) and 3.3 mm (rDOI-pDOI). Higher correlations were observed in the presence of perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and worst pattern of invasion 5 (WPOI 5), with r values up to 0.948 (rDOI-PDOI) and 0.980 (PDOI-pDOI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While rDOI correlates strongly with pathological DOI, overestimations in smaller and ulcerative lesions necessitate cautious interpretation. Pathological risk factors, including PNI, LVI, and WPOI 5, were associated with greater DOI and enhanced agreement between radiological and pathological assessments. Overall, CECT is a reliable tool for preoperative evaluation of DOI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral oncology\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"107159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107159\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correlation between radiological, macroscopic and microscopic depth of invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study using contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
Background: Depth of invasion (DOI) significantly influences prognosis and treatment strategies in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Accurate preoperative imaging, such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), alongside postoperative histopathological evaluations, aids in determining DOI. This study evaluates the correlation between radiological DOI (rDOI), macroscopic DOI (PDOI), and microscopic DOI (pDOI) in OSCC.
Methods: This study included 54 OSCC patients from April 2022 to November 2023. rDOI was assessed using preoperative CECT, while PDOI and pDOI were measured through histopathological examination of resected specimens. Spearman correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between DOI measurements, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Results: Strong correlations were found between rDOI and PDOI (r = 0.713), rDOI and pDOI (r = 0.688), and PDOI and pDOI (r = 0.897, p < 0.001 for all). CECT overestimated DOI in T1 and T2 lesions, particularly in ulcerative tumors. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences of 1.86 mm (rDOI-PDOI) and 3.3 mm (rDOI-pDOI). Higher correlations were observed in the presence of perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and worst pattern of invasion 5 (WPOI 5), with r values up to 0.948 (rDOI-PDOI) and 0.980 (PDOI-pDOI).
Conclusion: While rDOI correlates strongly with pathological DOI, overestimations in smaller and ulcerative lesions necessitate cautious interpretation. Pathological risk factors, including PNI, LVI, and WPOI 5, were associated with greater DOI and enhanced agreement between radiological and pathological assessments. Overall, CECT is a reliable tool for preoperative evaluation of DOI.
期刊介绍:
Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck.
Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.