口腔鳞状细胞癌的放射学、宏观和微观浸润深度的相关性:一项使用增强对比计算机断层扫描的前瞻性研究。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107159
P S Gopinath Thilak, Tanaya Mande, Vinay Kumar J Rajendra, H L Kishan Prasad, Padmaraj J Hegde
{"title":"口腔鳞状细胞癌的放射学、宏观和微观浸润深度的相关性:一项使用增强对比计算机断层扫描的前瞻性研究。","authors":"P S Gopinath Thilak, Tanaya Mande, Vinay Kumar J Rajendra, H L Kishan Prasad, Padmaraj J Hegde","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depth of invasion (DOI) significantly influences prognosis and treatment strategies in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Accurate preoperative imaging, such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), alongside postoperative histopathological evaluations, aids in determining DOI. This study evaluates the correlation between radiological DOI (rDOI), macroscopic DOI (PDOI), and microscopic DOI (pDOI) in OSCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 54 OSCC patients from April 2022 to November 2023. rDOI was assessed using preoperative CECT, while PDOI and pDOI were measured through histopathological examination of resected specimens. Spearman correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between DOI measurements, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong correlations were found between rDOI and PDOI (r = 0.713), rDOI and pDOI (r = 0.688), and PDOI and pDOI (r = 0.897, p < 0.001 for all). CECT overestimated DOI in T1 and T2 lesions, particularly in ulcerative tumors. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences of 1.86 mm (rDOI-PDOI) and 3.3 mm (rDOI-pDOI). Higher correlations were observed in the presence of perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and worst pattern of invasion 5 (WPOI 5), with r values up to 0.948 (rDOI-PDOI) and 0.980 (PDOI-pDOI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While rDOI correlates strongly with pathological DOI, overestimations in smaller and ulcerative lesions necessitate cautious interpretation. Pathological risk factors, including PNI, LVI, and WPOI 5, were associated with greater DOI and enhanced agreement between radiological and pathological assessments. Overall, CECT is a reliable tool for preoperative evaluation of DOI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"161 ","pages":"107159"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between radiological, macroscopic and microscopic depth of invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study using contrast-enhanced computed tomography.\",\"authors\":\"P S Gopinath Thilak, Tanaya Mande, Vinay Kumar J Rajendra, H L Kishan Prasad, Padmaraj J Hegde\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depth of invasion (DOI) significantly influences prognosis and treatment strategies in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Accurate preoperative imaging, such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), alongside postoperative histopathological evaluations, aids in determining DOI. This study evaluates the correlation between radiological DOI (rDOI), macroscopic DOI (PDOI), and microscopic DOI (pDOI) in OSCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 54 OSCC patients from April 2022 to November 2023. rDOI was assessed using preoperative CECT, while PDOI and pDOI were measured through histopathological examination of resected specimens. Spearman correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between DOI measurements, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong correlations were found between rDOI and PDOI (r = 0.713), rDOI and pDOI (r = 0.688), and PDOI and pDOI (r = 0.897, p < 0.001 for all). CECT overestimated DOI in T1 and T2 lesions, particularly in ulcerative tumors. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences of 1.86 mm (rDOI-PDOI) and 3.3 mm (rDOI-pDOI). Higher correlations were observed in the presence of perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and worst pattern of invasion 5 (WPOI 5), with r values up to 0.948 (rDOI-PDOI) and 0.980 (PDOI-pDOI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While rDOI correlates strongly with pathological DOI, overestimations in smaller and ulcerative lesions necessitate cautious interpretation. Pathological risk factors, including PNI, LVI, and WPOI 5, were associated with greater DOI and enhanced agreement between radiological and pathological assessments. Overall, CECT is a reliable tool for preoperative evaluation of DOI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral oncology\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"107159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107159\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)的侵袭深度(DOI)显著影响预后和治疗策略。准确的术前成像,如对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT),以及术后组织病理学评估,有助于确定DOI。本研究评估了OSCC的放射学DOI (rDOI)、宏观DOI (PDOI)和微观DOI (PDOI)之间的相关性。方法:本研究纳入了2022年4月至2023年11月的54例OSCC患者。术前CECT评估rDOI,切除标本组织病理学检查PDOI和PDOI。Spearman相关分析和Bland-Altman图评估了DOI测量值之间的一致性,统计显著性设置为p。结果:rDOI与PDOI (r = 0.713)、rDOI与PDOI (r = 0.688)、PDOI与PDOI (r = 0.897, p)之间存在强相关性。结论:虽然rDOI与病理DOI相关性强,但在较小和溃疡性病变中高估的值需要谨慎解释。病理危险因素,包括PNI、LVI和WPOI 5,与更高的DOI以及放射学和病理评估之间的一致性增强相关。综上所述,CECT是术前评价DOI的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation between radiological, macroscopic and microscopic depth of invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study using contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

Background: Depth of invasion (DOI) significantly influences prognosis and treatment strategies in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Accurate preoperative imaging, such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), alongside postoperative histopathological evaluations, aids in determining DOI. This study evaluates the correlation between radiological DOI (rDOI), macroscopic DOI (PDOI), and microscopic DOI (pDOI) in OSCC.

Methods: This study included 54 OSCC patients from April 2022 to November 2023. rDOI was assessed using preoperative CECT, while PDOI and pDOI were measured through histopathological examination of resected specimens. Spearman correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between DOI measurements, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: Strong correlations were found between rDOI and PDOI (r = 0.713), rDOI and pDOI (r = 0.688), and PDOI and pDOI (r = 0.897, p < 0.001 for all). CECT overestimated DOI in T1 and T2 lesions, particularly in ulcerative tumors. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences of 1.86 mm (rDOI-PDOI) and 3.3 mm (rDOI-pDOI). Higher correlations were observed in the presence of perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and worst pattern of invasion 5 (WPOI 5), with r values up to 0.948 (rDOI-PDOI) and 0.980 (PDOI-pDOI).

Conclusion: While rDOI correlates strongly with pathological DOI, overestimations in smaller and ulcerative lesions necessitate cautious interpretation. Pathological risk factors, including PNI, LVI, and WPOI 5, were associated with greater DOI and enhanced agreement between radiological and pathological assessments. Overall, CECT is a reliable tool for preoperative evaluation of DOI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral oncology
Oral oncology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
505
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck. Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Comment on "Extensive necrosis of the tongue as a very early adverse event of head and neck radiotherapy". Comment on "Surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for cT1-T3 supraglottic laryngeal cancers: A systematic review". Selperctinib as neoadjuvant therapy for RET-altered papillary thyroid carcinoma: Two case reports. Association of race and ethnicity with quality of care among head and neck cancer patients in California. Immunotherapeutic strategies beyond the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma - A scoping review on current developments in agents targeting TIM-3, TIGIT, LAG-3, and VISTA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1