母语和非母语学习伙伴对医学生第二语言医学荷兰语学习信心和合作策略的影响

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2024-08-12 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-02138-1
Hao Yu, S Eleonore Köhler, Fatemeh Janesarvatan, Jeroen J G van Merriënboer, Maryam Asoodar
{"title":"母语和非母语学习伙伴对医学生第二语言医学荷兰语学习信心和合作策略的影响","authors":"Hao Yu, S Eleonore Köhler, Fatemeh Janesarvatan, Jeroen J G van Merriënboer, Maryam Asoodar","doi":"10.1007/s40670-024-02138-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored how native and nonnative study partners impact medical students' confidence, learning strategies, and perceptions of learning experiences in second language (L2) medical Dutch learning using Kolb's experiential learning framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve third-year international bachelor medical students participated in a mixed-methods pre-post quasi-experimental design. Four students were paired with highly proficient native Dutch partners in a mixed group, and eight nonnative students formed pairs in a homogeneous group. The need satisfaction competence scale was used for pre- and post-tests, and individual interviews were analyzed for content and themes. Code co-occurrence and network analyses were carried out to identify the relationships between themes in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Common themes in both groups included a positive atmosphere, collaboration, and confidence. The mixed group prioritized language learning and motivation, while the homogeneous group emphasized interpersonal relationships and feedback-seeking behaviors. Nonnative students in homogeneous groups gained confidence, while confidence of those in mixed groups decreased, possibly due to comparing themselves with native partners. Homogeneous groups have communication focused collaborative strategies, while the mixed group emphasized personal growth with fewer drawbacks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that initiating the course with homogeneous nonnative student groups fosters collaboration and builds confidence among participants. However, to maintain motivation and further enhance language proficiency, it is advisable to introduce native Dutch partners at a later stage of the course. This approach allows students to benefit from both the positive collaborative atmosphere and interpersonal growth fostered in homogeneous groups, as well as the language learning and motivation gains associated with mixed-group experiences. Overall, our study highlights the importance of considering the stage of language learning and student needs in designing effective second language learning environments for medical students.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02138-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"34 6","pages":"1445-1455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Native and Nonnative Study Partners on Medical Students' Confidence and Collaborative Strategies in Second Language Medical Dutch Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Hao Yu, S Eleonore Köhler, Fatemeh Janesarvatan, Jeroen J G van Merriënboer, Maryam Asoodar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40670-024-02138-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored how native and nonnative study partners impact medical students' confidence, learning strategies, and perceptions of learning experiences in second language (L2) medical Dutch learning using Kolb's experiential learning framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve third-year international bachelor medical students participated in a mixed-methods pre-post quasi-experimental design. Four students were paired with highly proficient native Dutch partners in a mixed group, and eight nonnative students formed pairs in a homogeneous group. The need satisfaction competence scale was used for pre- and post-tests, and individual interviews were analyzed for content and themes. Code co-occurrence and network analyses were carried out to identify the relationships between themes in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Common themes in both groups included a positive atmosphere, collaboration, and confidence. The mixed group prioritized language learning and motivation, while the homogeneous group emphasized interpersonal relationships and feedback-seeking behaviors. Nonnative students in homogeneous groups gained confidence, while confidence of those in mixed groups decreased, possibly due to comparing themselves with native partners. Homogeneous groups have communication focused collaborative strategies, while the mixed group emphasized personal growth with fewer drawbacks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that initiating the course with homogeneous nonnative student groups fosters collaboration and builds confidence among participants. However, to maintain motivation and further enhance language proficiency, it is advisable to introduce native Dutch partners at a later stage of the course. This approach allows students to benefit from both the positive collaborative atmosphere and interpersonal growth fostered in homogeneous groups, as well as the language learning and motivation gains associated with mixed-group experiences. Overall, our study highlights the importance of considering the stage of language learning and student needs in designing effective second language learning environments for medical students.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02138-1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Educator\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"1445-1455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699018/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02138-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02138-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究利用Kolb的体验式学习框架,探讨母语和非母语学习伙伴如何影响医学生在第二语言医学荷兰语学习中的信心、学习策略和学习经验感知。方法:12名国际医学本科三年级学生参与混合方法的前后准实验设计。四名学生与非常精通荷兰语的荷兰人组成混合组,八名非荷兰人组成一组。使用需求满足能力量表进行前后测试,并对内容和主题进行个体访谈分析。通过代码共现和网络分析来确定两组主题之间的关系。结果:两组的共同主题包括积极的氛围、合作和自信。混合组优先考虑语言学习和动机,而同质组强调人际关系和寻求反馈的行为。同质组的非本地学生信心增强,而混合组的学生信心下降,可能是由于与本地伙伴比较所致。同质组注重沟通协作策略,而混合组注重个人成长,缺点较少。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在同质的非母语学生群体中开始课程可以促进合作,并在参与者之间建立信心。然而,为了保持动力和进一步提高语言能力,建议在课程的后期引入荷兰本土的合作伙伴。这种方法使学生既能从同质群体中培养的积极的合作氛围和人际成长中受益,也能从混合群体的经历中获得语言学习和动力。总之,我们的研究强调了在为医学生设计有效的第二语言学习环境时考虑语言学习阶段和学生需求的重要性。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s40670-024-02138-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Native and Nonnative Study Partners on Medical Students' Confidence and Collaborative Strategies in Second Language Medical Dutch Learning.

Objective: This study explored how native and nonnative study partners impact medical students' confidence, learning strategies, and perceptions of learning experiences in second language (L2) medical Dutch learning using Kolb's experiential learning framework.

Methods: Twelve third-year international bachelor medical students participated in a mixed-methods pre-post quasi-experimental design. Four students were paired with highly proficient native Dutch partners in a mixed group, and eight nonnative students formed pairs in a homogeneous group. The need satisfaction competence scale was used for pre- and post-tests, and individual interviews were analyzed for content and themes. Code co-occurrence and network analyses were carried out to identify the relationships between themes in the two groups.

Results: Common themes in both groups included a positive atmosphere, collaboration, and confidence. The mixed group prioritized language learning and motivation, while the homogeneous group emphasized interpersonal relationships and feedback-seeking behaviors. Nonnative students in homogeneous groups gained confidence, while confidence of those in mixed groups decreased, possibly due to comparing themselves with native partners. Homogeneous groups have communication focused collaborative strategies, while the mixed group emphasized personal growth with fewer drawbacks.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that initiating the course with homogeneous nonnative student groups fosters collaboration and builds confidence among participants. However, to maintain motivation and further enhance language proficiency, it is advisable to introduce native Dutch partners at a later stage of the course. This approach allows students to benefit from both the positive collaborative atmosphere and interpersonal growth fostered in homogeneous groups, as well as the language learning and motivation gains associated with mixed-group experiences. Overall, our study highlights the importance of considering the stage of language learning and student needs in designing effective second language learning environments for medical students.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02138-1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
期刊最新文献
Letter from the Editor. IAMSE Artificial Intelligence Meeting Survey: AI's Impact on Medical Education Faculty. Letter from the Editor. Mini Self-Retrieval Practices of Skeletal Muscles in the Human Gross Anatomy Course. Embracing Technology to Develop a Clinical Pharmacology and Medication Safety Elective in Undergraduate Medical Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1