不同的调查方法会影响医生的工作偏好吗?中国东部地区离散选择实验的结果。

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1474795
Lizhu Wang, Dan Hu, Jing Zhu
{"title":"不同的调查方法会影响医生的工作偏好吗?中国东部地区离散选择实验的结果。","authors":"Lizhu Wang, Dan Hu, Jing Zhu","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1474795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the impact of online and offline survey methods on the participation of physicians in discrete choice experiment (DCE) surveys in Eastern China and explore their attitudes towards primary healthcare work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved active doctors practicing at secondary or county-level general hospitals in Eastern China, who completed a DCE questionnaire either online or offline. A mixed logit model was used to analyze the data, considering the relative importance of various job attributes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that online surveys save costs and offline surveys help increase the response rate for questionnaires. The validity rate for the completed questionnaires was high (>90%) across both research methods. A mixed logit model simulation analysis revealed that compensation packages were the dominant influence on doctors' choices. The online survey showed that doctors were more likely to choose to work in village health centers if their salary was flat (<i>β</i> = 1.330), while the offline survey showed that doctors were also more likely to choose village health centers when their salary was increased by 10% (<i>β</i> = 1.095). Work organization and public recognition also had a significant effect on doctors' primary job choices (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded that remuneration, work organization, and public recognition are key factors affecting physicians' willingness to work in primary healthcare settings. For respondents with higher education and cognitive abilities, online surveys are recommended for DCE research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"9 ","pages":"1474795"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do different survey methods affect physicians' stated work preferences? Findings from a discrete choice experiment in Eastern China.\",\"authors\":\"Lizhu Wang, Dan Hu, Jing Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1474795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the impact of online and offline survey methods on the participation of physicians in discrete choice experiment (DCE) surveys in Eastern China and explore their attitudes towards primary healthcare work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved active doctors practicing at secondary or county-level general hospitals in Eastern China, who completed a DCE questionnaire either online or offline. A mixed logit model was used to analyze the data, considering the relative importance of various job attributes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that online surveys save costs and offline surveys help increase the response rate for questionnaires. The validity rate for the completed questionnaires was high (>90%) across both research methods. A mixed logit model simulation analysis revealed that compensation packages were the dominant influence on doctors' choices. The online survey showed that doctors were more likely to choose to work in village health centers if their salary was flat (<i>β</i> = 1.330), while the offline survey showed that doctors were also more likely to choose village health centers when their salary was increased by 10% (<i>β</i> = 1.095). Work organization and public recognition also had a significant effect on doctors' primary job choices (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded that remuneration, work organization, and public recognition are key factors affecting physicians' willingness to work in primary healthcare settings. For respondents with higher education and cognitive abilities, online surveys are recommended for DCE research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sociology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"1474795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1474795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1474795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在考察线上和线下调查方式对华东地区医师离散选择实验(DCE)调查参与程度的影响,并探讨其对初级卫生保健工作的态度。方法:研究对象为华东地区二级或县级综合医院的在职医生,他们在线上或线下填写了一份DCE问卷。考虑到各种作业属性的相对重要性,采用混合logit模型对数据进行分析。结果:本研究发现线上调查节省了成本,线下调查有助于提高问卷的回复率。在两种研究方法中,完成的问卷的效度都很高(bbb90 %)。混合logit模型仿真分析表明,薪酬方案是影响医生选择的主要因素。在线调查显示,当医生的工资水平不变时,他们更有可能选择在乡村卫生院工作(β = 1.330),而线下调查显示,当医生的工资水平增加10%时,他们也更有可能选择在乡村卫生院工作(β = 1.095)。工作组织和公众认可对医生的主要职业选择也有显著影响(p )结论:薪酬、工作组织和公众认可是影响医生在初级卫生保健机构工作意愿的关键因素。对于受教育程度较高、认知能力较强的受访者,建议采用在线调查的方式进行DCE研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do different survey methods affect physicians' stated work preferences? Findings from a discrete choice experiment in Eastern China.

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the impact of online and offline survey methods on the participation of physicians in discrete choice experiment (DCE) surveys in Eastern China and explore their attitudes towards primary healthcare work.

Methods: The study involved active doctors practicing at secondary or county-level general hospitals in Eastern China, who completed a DCE questionnaire either online or offline. A mixed logit model was used to analyze the data, considering the relative importance of various job attributes.

Results: This study found that online surveys save costs and offline surveys help increase the response rate for questionnaires. The validity rate for the completed questionnaires was high (>90%) across both research methods. A mixed logit model simulation analysis revealed that compensation packages were the dominant influence on doctors' choices. The online survey showed that doctors were more likely to choose to work in village health centers if their salary was flat (β = 1.330), while the offline survey showed that doctors were also more likely to choose village health centers when their salary was increased by 10% (β = 1.095). Work organization and public recognition also had a significant effect on doctors' primary job choices (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The study concluded that remuneration, work organization, and public recognition are key factors affecting physicians' willingness to work in primary healthcare settings. For respondents with higher education and cognitive abilities, online surveys are recommended for DCE research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Dismantling racial inequalities in higher education. Exploring perceived barriers to palliative and end of life care provision in South-West England: bringing together the perspectives of professionals, patients, and families. Unveiling inequality: the sociological dynamics of road infrastructure development and social justice in rural Eastern Cape, South Africa. Using the knife to build the trust? The role of trust in the decision-making process of aesthetic surgeons and women patients/clients. A family caregiver perspective: rethinking recovery with phenomenology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1