加速计可以正确计算骨科患者在使用助行器时的早期术后步数。

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70134
Spiros Tsamassiotis, Michael Schwarze, Philipp Gehring, Roman F. Karkosch, Lars-René Tücking, Ann-Kathrin Einfeldt, Eike Jakubowitz
{"title":"加速计可以正确计算骨科患者在使用助行器时的早期术后步数。","authors":"Spiros Tsamassiotis,&nbsp;Michael Schwarze,&nbsp;Philipp Gehring,&nbsp;Roman F. Karkosch,&nbsp;Lars-René Tücking,&nbsp;Ann-Kathrin Einfeldt,&nbsp;Eike Jakubowitz","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Effective rehabilitation after orthopaedic surgery is critical. The early post-operative phase is increasingly managed in outpatient settings, necessitating objective measures such as step counts to monitor rehabilitation progress. However, it remains unclear if commercially available wearables or accelerometers using simple algorithms can accurately count steps in early post-operative conditions. We hypothesised that only accelerometers could accurately determine the number of steps under these conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This case series involved 20 healthy subjects, 7 female and 13 males, walking in a circle at varying speeds under partial loading with three different walking aids (forearm crutches, walking frame and rolling walker) and four wearables (Vivofit 4, Fenix 3HR, Fitbit Charge 3 and Omron HJ-325) and one accelerometer (AX6) worn on the wrist, hip and ankle. The two-point and modified three-point gait patterns commonly used post-operatively were simulated. The primary end point was the relative error (RE), defined as RE = (manual count − automated count)/manual count, of each wearable measurement compared to visual and video step counting, the gold standard.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The RE of AX6 and Fitbit was less than 0.1 for all walking aids except the rolling walker, with AX6 showing the lowest standard deviation (SD) compared to other wearables. Other wearables had significantly higher RE. Increased gait speed generally improved accuracy, reducing RE in most devices, except for the AX6, which showed the opposite trend. At 0.6 m/s, only AX6 achieved an RE below 0.1. The ankle was identified as the best measuring location.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>During the early post-operative period, commercial wearables can only accurately count steps under specific conditions and should be used cautiously for monitoring steps in the early post-operative phase. However, accelerometers with appropriate coding appear suitable for this purpose.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III diagnostic study.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerometers can correctly count orthopaedic patients' early post-operative steps while using walking aids\",\"authors\":\"Spiros Tsamassiotis,&nbsp;Michael Schwarze,&nbsp;Philipp Gehring,&nbsp;Roman F. Karkosch,&nbsp;Lars-René Tücking,&nbsp;Ann-Kathrin Einfeldt,&nbsp;Eike Jakubowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Effective rehabilitation after orthopaedic surgery is critical. The early post-operative phase is increasingly managed in outpatient settings, necessitating objective measures such as step counts to monitor rehabilitation progress. However, it remains unclear if commercially available wearables or accelerometers using simple algorithms can accurately count steps in early post-operative conditions. We hypothesised that only accelerometers could accurately determine the number of steps under these conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This case series involved 20 healthy subjects, 7 female and 13 males, walking in a circle at varying speeds under partial loading with three different walking aids (forearm crutches, walking frame and rolling walker) and four wearables (Vivofit 4, Fenix 3HR, Fitbit Charge 3 and Omron HJ-325) and one accelerometer (AX6) worn on the wrist, hip and ankle. The two-point and modified three-point gait patterns commonly used post-operatively were simulated. The primary end point was the relative error (RE), defined as RE = (manual count − automated count)/manual count, of each wearable measurement compared to visual and video step counting, the gold standard.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The RE of AX6 and Fitbit was less than 0.1 for all walking aids except the rolling walker, with AX6 showing the lowest standard deviation (SD) compared to other wearables. Other wearables had significantly higher RE. Increased gait speed generally improved accuracy, reducing RE in most devices, except for the AX6, which showed the opposite trend. At 0.6 m/s, only AX6 achieved an RE below 0.1. The ankle was identified as the best measuring location.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>During the early post-operative period, commercial wearables can only accurately count steps under specific conditions and should be used cautiously for monitoring steps in the early post-operative phase. However, accelerometers with appropriate coding appear suitable for this purpose.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level III diagnostic study.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696250/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:骨科手术后有效的康复至关重要。术后早期越来越多地在门诊进行管理,需要采取客观措施,如步数来监测康复进展。然而,目前尚不清楚商用可穿戴设备或使用简单算法的加速度计能否在术后早期准确计算步数。我们假设,在这些条件下,只有加速度计才能准确地确定步数。方法:本病例系列包括20名健康受试者,女性7名,男性13名,在部分负荷下以不同速度绕圈行走,使用3种不同的助行器(前臂拐杖、步行架和滚动助行器)和4种可穿戴设备(Vivofit 4、Fenix 3HR、Fitbit Charge 3和欧姆龙HJ-325)和1个加速度计(AX6)佩戴在手腕、髋部和脚踝。模拟了术后常用的两点和改良三点步态模式。主要终点是相对误差(RE),定义为RE =(手动计数-自动计数)/手动计数,每个可穿戴测量与视觉和视频步数(黄金标准)相比。结果:除滚动助行器外,所有助行器中AX6和Fitbit的RE均小于0.1,其中AX6的标准差(SD)较其他可穿戴设备最低。其他可穿戴设备的RE值明显更高。步态速度的增加通常会提高准确率,除了AX6外,大多数设备的RE值都降低了。在0.6 m/s时,只有AX6实现了低于0.1的RE。踝关节被确定为最佳测量位置。结论:术后早期商用可穿戴设备只能在特定条件下准确计数步数,术后早期监测步数应谨慎使用。然而,带有适当编码的加速度计似乎适合于此目的。证据等级:III级诊断性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accelerometers can correctly count orthopaedic patients' early post-operative steps while using walking aids

Purpose

Effective rehabilitation after orthopaedic surgery is critical. The early post-operative phase is increasingly managed in outpatient settings, necessitating objective measures such as step counts to monitor rehabilitation progress. However, it remains unclear if commercially available wearables or accelerometers using simple algorithms can accurately count steps in early post-operative conditions. We hypothesised that only accelerometers could accurately determine the number of steps under these conditions.

Methods

This case series involved 20 healthy subjects, 7 female and 13 males, walking in a circle at varying speeds under partial loading with three different walking aids (forearm crutches, walking frame and rolling walker) and four wearables (Vivofit 4, Fenix 3HR, Fitbit Charge 3 and Omron HJ-325) and one accelerometer (AX6) worn on the wrist, hip and ankle. The two-point and modified three-point gait patterns commonly used post-operatively were simulated. The primary end point was the relative error (RE), defined as RE = (manual count − automated count)/manual count, of each wearable measurement compared to visual and video step counting, the gold standard.

Results

The RE of AX6 and Fitbit was less than 0.1 for all walking aids except the rolling walker, with AX6 showing the lowest standard deviation (SD) compared to other wearables. Other wearables had significantly higher RE. Increased gait speed generally improved accuracy, reducing RE in most devices, except for the AX6, which showed the opposite trend. At 0.6 m/s, only AX6 achieved an RE below 0.1. The ankle was identified as the best measuring location.

Conclusion

During the early post-operative period, commercial wearables can only accurately count steps under specific conditions and should be used cautiously for monitoring steps in the early post-operative phase. However, accelerometers with appropriate coding appear suitable for this purpose.

Level of Evidence

Level III diagnostic study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Calcaneo-stop for paediatric idiopathic flexible flatfoot: High functional results and return to sport in 644 feet at mid-term follow-up Reproducibility of a new device for robotic-assisted TKA surgery The central fibre areas in the tibial footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament show the highest contribution to restriction of a posterior drawer force—A biomechanical robotic investigation The short version of the ALR-RSI scale is a valid and reproducible scale to evaluate psychological readiness to return to sport after ankle lateral reconstruction Which treatment strategy for irreparable rotator cuff tears is most cost-effective? A Markov model-based cost-utility analysis comparing superior capsular reconstruction, lower trapezius tendon transfer, subacromial balloon spacer implantation and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1