Kai Hoffeld, Christopher Wahlers, Jan P. Hockmann, Sebastian Wegmann, Nadine Ott, Kilian Wegmann, Lars Peter Müller, Michael Hackl
{"title":"评估铰接肘支具减轻尺侧副韧带损伤后被动外翻力的疗效-生物力学研究。","authors":"Kai Hoffeld, Christopher Wahlers, Jan P. Hockmann, Sebastian Wegmann, Nadine Ott, Kilian Wegmann, Lars Peter Müller, Michael Hackl","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This biomechanical study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a hinged elbow orthosis in reducing passive valgus forces following medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries of the elbow joint. The hypothesis tested was that a hinged elbow orthosis reduces these passive valgus forces.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eight fresh frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were prepared and tested under three scenarios: intact ligaments, simulated UCL rupture and application of a hinged elbow brace after simulated UCL rupture. Valgus instability was assessed using a custom testing set-up and the Optotrak motion capture system. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the results across scenarios.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Intraclass correlation (ICC) calculation showed that the testing set-up was reliable in investigating valgus deflection across all levels of applied force. The hinged elbow brace reduced passive valgus forces after UCL rupture. The reduction in valgus instability was consistent with close approximation to the native state, although not reaching its level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The hypothesis—that a hinged elbow orthosis significantly reduces passive valgus forces in the elbow following UCL injuries—is not supported by the data and therefore has to be rejected. Nevertheless, the study demonstrates a tendency that a hinged elbow brace could mitigate these forces, at least in an experimental cadaveric model with static study conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>The level of evidence of this study is level IV.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the efficacy of hinged elbow braces in reducing passive valgus forces after ulnar collateral ligament injury—A biomechanical study\",\"authors\":\"Kai Hoffeld, Christopher Wahlers, Jan P. Hockmann, Sebastian Wegmann, Nadine Ott, Kilian Wegmann, Lars Peter Müller, Michael Hackl\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This biomechanical study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a hinged elbow orthosis in reducing passive valgus forces following medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries of the elbow joint. The hypothesis tested was that a hinged elbow orthosis reduces these passive valgus forces.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eight fresh frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were prepared and tested under three scenarios: intact ligaments, simulated UCL rupture and application of a hinged elbow brace after simulated UCL rupture. Valgus instability was assessed using a custom testing set-up and the Optotrak motion capture system. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the results across scenarios.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Intraclass correlation (ICC) calculation showed that the testing set-up was reliable in investigating valgus deflection across all levels of applied force. The hinged elbow brace reduced passive valgus forces after UCL rupture. The reduction in valgus instability was consistent with close approximation to the native state, although not reaching its level.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The hypothesis—that a hinged elbow orthosis significantly reduces passive valgus forces in the elbow following UCL injuries—is not supported by the data and therefore has to be rejected. Nevertheless, the study demonstrates a tendency that a hinged elbow brace could mitigate these forces, at least in an experimental cadaveric model with static study conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>The level of evidence of this study is level IV.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696245/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the efficacy of hinged elbow braces in reducing passive valgus forces after ulnar collateral ligament injury—A biomechanical study
Purpose
This biomechanical study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a hinged elbow orthosis in reducing passive valgus forces following medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries of the elbow joint. The hypothesis tested was that a hinged elbow orthosis reduces these passive valgus forces.
Methods
Eight fresh frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were prepared and tested under three scenarios: intact ligaments, simulated UCL rupture and application of a hinged elbow brace after simulated UCL rupture. Valgus instability was assessed using a custom testing set-up and the Optotrak motion capture system. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the results across scenarios.
Results
Intraclass correlation (ICC) calculation showed that the testing set-up was reliable in investigating valgus deflection across all levels of applied force. The hinged elbow brace reduced passive valgus forces after UCL rupture. The reduction in valgus instability was consistent with close approximation to the native state, although not reaching its level.
Conclusion
The hypothesis—that a hinged elbow orthosis significantly reduces passive valgus forces in the elbow following UCL injuries—is not supported by the data and therefore has to be rejected. Nevertheless, the study demonstrates a tendency that a hinged elbow brace could mitigate these forces, at least in an experimental cadaveric model with static study conditions.