Brenda O'Neill, Mark A Linden, Pam Ramsay, Alia Darweish Medniuk, Joanne Outtrim, Judy King, Bronagh Blackwood
{"title":"ICU出院后患者的激活和支持需求:英国危重疾病幸存者调查。","authors":"Brenda O'Neill, Mark A Linden, Pam Ramsay, Alia Darweish Medniuk, Joanne Outtrim, Judy King, Bronagh Blackwood","doi":"10.1177/17511437241305266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the degree to which patients are actively involved, confident and capable of engaging with self-management and rehabilitation could be an initial step in guiding individualised supportive strategies for people after critical illness.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the levels of active involvement with self management among ICU survivors using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), explore associations between patient characteristics and PAM results, and investigate its relationship with patients' support needs at key transition points during the recovery process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants received both the PAM and Support Needs After Critical care (SNAC) questionnaires by post. The return of the completed questionnaires was considered as consent to participate. Ethical approval was obtained (17/NI/0236). Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data and Pearson's coefficient for correlations between variables.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were 200 completed PAM and SNAC questionnaires. PAM scores showed that levels of active involvement with self management fell into level 1 (<i>n</i> = 64; disengaged and overwhelmed, low confidence to self manage) and 2 (<i>n</i> = 70; still struggling), with considerably less participants achieving scores in level 3 (<i>n</i> = 51; taking action) and 4 (<i>n</i> = 15; pushing further). Lower patient activation levels were associated with higher support needs (r = -0.16, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that patient activation levels are low implying low knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage after critical illness, and also that patients have support needs at various timepoints during recovery. Future research should focus on a longitudinal study to track changes in activation and support needs in the same patients over time and identify effective strategies to optimise recovery after critical illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437241305266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient activation and support needs in patients after ICU discharge: A UK survey of critical illness survivors.\",\"authors\":\"Brenda O'Neill, Mark A Linden, Pam Ramsay, Alia Darweish Medniuk, Joanne Outtrim, Judy King, Bronagh Blackwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17511437241305266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the degree to which patients are actively involved, confident and capable of engaging with self-management and rehabilitation could be an initial step in guiding individualised supportive strategies for people after critical illness.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the levels of active involvement with self management among ICU survivors using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), explore associations between patient characteristics and PAM results, and investigate its relationship with patients' support needs at key transition points during the recovery process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants received both the PAM and Support Needs After Critical care (SNAC) questionnaires by post. The return of the completed questionnaires was considered as consent to participate. Ethical approval was obtained (17/NI/0236). Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data and Pearson's coefficient for correlations between variables.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were 200 completed PAM and SNAC questionnaires. PAM scores showed that levels of active involvement with self management fell into level 1 (<i>n</i> = 64; disengaged and overwhelmed, low confidence to self manage) and 2 (<i>n</i> = 70; still struggling), with considerably less participants achieving scores in level 3 (<i>n</i> = 51; taking action) and 4 (<i>n</i> = 15; pushing further). Lower patient activation levels were associated with higher support needs (r = -0.16, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that patient activation levels are low implying low knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage after critical illness, and also that patients have support needs at various timepoints during recovery. Future research should focus on a longitudinal study to track changes in activation and support needs in the same patients over time and identify effective strategies to optimise recovery after critical illness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17511437241305266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699553/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437241305266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437241305266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient activation and support needs in patients after ICU discharge: A UK survey of critical illness survivors.
Background: Understanding the degree to which patients are actively involved, confident and capable of engaging with self-management and rehabilitation could be an initial step in guiding individualised supportive strategies for people after critical illness.
Aims: To assess the levels of active involvement with self management among ICU survivors using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), explore associations between patient characteristics and PAM results, and investigate its relationship with patients' support needs at key transition points during the recovery process.
Methods: Eligible participants received both the PAM and Support Needs After Critical care (SNAC) questionnaires by post. The return of the completed questionnaires was considered as consent to participate. Ethical approval was obtained (17/NI/0236). Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data and Pearson's coefficient for correlations between variables.
Findings: There were 200 completed PAM and SNAC questionnaires. PAM scores showed that levels of active involvement with self management fell into level 1 (n = 64; disengaged and overwhelmed, low confidence to self manage) and 2 (n = 70; still struggling), with considerably less participants achieving scores in level 3 (n = 51; taking action) and 4 (n = 15; pushing further). Lower patient activation levels were associated with higher support needs (r = -0.16, p = 0.02).
Conclusion: We found that patient activation levels are low implying low knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage after critical illness, and also that patients have support needs at various timepoints during recovery. Future research should focus on a longitudinal study to track changes in activation and support needs in the same patients over time and identify effective strategies to optimise recovery after critical illness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.