不同DWI序列对前列腺MR影像及前列腺良性疾病预测价值的评价。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Current Medical Imaging Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2174/0115734056329976241209112720
Hanli Dan, Lu Yang, Yuchuan Tan, Yipeng Zhang, Yong Tan, Jing Zhang, Min Li, Meng Lin, Jiuquan Zhang
{"title":"不同DWI序列对前列腺MR影像及前列腺良性疾病预测价值的评价。","authors":"Hanli Dan, Lu Yang, Yuchuan Tan, Yipeng Zhang, Yong Tan, Jing Zhang, Min Li, Meng Lin, Jiuquan Zhang","doi":"10.2174/0115734056329976241209112720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early diagnosis of prostate cancer can improve the survival rate of patients on the premise of high-quality images. The prerequisite for early diagnosis is high-quality images. ZOOMit is a method for high-resolution, zoomed FOV imaging, allowing diffusion-weighted images with high contrast and resolution in short acquisition times. RESOLVE DWI is an advanced MRI technique developed to obtain high-resolution diffusionweighted images with reduced susceptibility-related artifacts.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the image quality of conventional single-shot Echo-planar Imaging (ss-EPI), Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI), zoomed FOV imaging (ZOOMit) DWI, and readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains (RESOLVE) DWI sequences for prostate imaging, and optimize the strategy to obtain high-quality Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in order to discriminate malignant and benign prostate diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one patients were enrolled, including 31 with prostate cancer, 11 with prostate benign disease, and 9 with bladder cancer. Patients underwent MRI scans using T2-weighted (T2W), ss-EPI DWI, ZOOMit DWI, and RESOLVE DWI (b = 0, 50, 1400 s/mm2) sequences using a 3.0T MRI scanner. Subjective scores of image quality were evaluated by two independent radiologists. Differences in the subjective scores and objective parameters among the three sequences were compared. The agreement and consistency between the findings of the two raters were evaluated with Kappa or Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to distinguish malignant and benign prostate disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement of subjective scores of 51 patients was high or moderate between the two radiologists (kappa: 0.529-0.880). ZOOMit displayed the highest clarity and the lowest distortion and artifacts compared to ss-EPI and RESOLVE. The two radiologic technicians obtained moderate or high consistency of objective measurement (ICC: 0.527-0.924). In the ROC analysis, ADCmean and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores for three sequences were comparable in differentiating prostate cancer from benign prostate disease (all p>0.05), in which ZOOMit indicated the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0.930 and 0.790, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the other two sequences, ZOOMit can be deemed preferable to improve prostate MRI diffusion imaging as it has exhibited the highest AUC in identifying prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Prostate MR Image and Predictive Value for Benign Prostate Disease among Different DWI Sequences.\",\"authors\":\"Hanli Dan, Lu Yang, Yuchuan Tan, Yipeng Zhang, Yong Tan, Jing Zhang, Min Li, Meng Lin, Jiuquan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734056329976241209112720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early diagnosis of prostate cancer can improve the survival rate of patients on the premise of high-quality images. The prerequisite for early diagnosis is high-quality images. ZOOMit is a method for high-resolution, zoomed FOV imaging, allowing diffusion-weighted images with high contrast and resolution in short acquisition times. RESOLVE DWI is an advanced MRI technique developed to obtain high-resolution diffusionweighted images with reduced susceptibility-related artifacts.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the image quality of conventional single-shot Echo-planar Imaging (ss-EPI), Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI), zoomed FOV imaging (ZOOMit) DWI, and readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains (RESOLVE) DWI sequences for prostate imaging, and optimize the strategy to obtain high-quality Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in order to discriminate malignant and benign prostate diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one patients were enrolled, including 31 with prostate cancer, 11 with prostate benign disease, and 9 with bladder cancer. Patients underwent MRI scans using T2-weighted (T2W), ss-EPI DWI, ZOOMit DWI, and RESOLVE DWI (b = 0, 50, 1400 s/mm2) sequences using a 3.0T MRI scanner. Subjective scores of image quality were evaluated by two independent radiologists. Differences in the subjective scores and objective parameters among the three sequences were compared. The agreement and consistency between the findings of the two raters were evaluated with Kappa or Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to distinguish malignant and benign prostate disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement of subjective scores of 51 patients was high or moderate between the two radiologists (kappa: 0.529-0.880). ZOOMit displayed the highest clarity and the lowest distortion and artifacts compared to ss-EPI and RESOLVE. The two radiologic technicians obtained moderate or high consistency of objective measurement (ICC: 0.527-0.924). In the ROC analysis, ADCmean and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores for three sequences were comparable in differentiating prostate cancer from benign prostate disease (all p>0.05), in which ZOOMit indicated the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0.930 and 0.790, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the other two sequences, ZOOMit can be deemed preferable to improve prostate MRI diffusion imaging as it has exhibited the highest AUC in identifying prostate cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056329976241209112720\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056329976241209112720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前列腺癌的早期诊断可以在高质量影像的前提下提高患者的生存率。早期诊断的前提是高质量的图像。ZOOMit是一种高分辨率的方法,缩放FOV成像,允许扩散加权图像具有高对比度和分辨率在短的采集时间。RESOLVE DWI是一种先进的MRI技术,用于获得高分辨率的扩散加权图像,减少了与敏感性相关的伪影。目的:比较常规单次超声平面成像(ss-EPI)、弥散加权成像(DWI)、放大视场成像(ZOOMit) DWI和长可变回声序列读数分割(RESOLVE) DWI序列用于前列腺成像的图像质量,优化策略,获得高质量的磁共振成像(MRI),以鉴别前列腺恶性和良性疾病。方法:纳入51例患者,其中前列腺癌31例,前列腺良性疾病11例,膀胱癌9例。患者使用3.0T MRI扫描仪进行t2加权(T2W), ss-EPI DWI, ZOOMit DWI和RESOLVE DWI (b = 0,50,1400 s/mm2)序列的MRI扫描。图像质量的主观评分由两名独立的放射科医生评估。比较三个序列的主观得分和客观参数的差异。用Kappa或类内相关系数(ICC)来评价两种评分者的一致性和一致性。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线用于区分前列腺恶性和良性疾病。结果:51例患者主观评分与两名放射科医师的一致性为高或中(kappa: 0.529-0.880)。与ss-EPI和RESOLVE相比,ZOOMit显示了最高的清晰度和最低的失真和伪影。两名放射技师获得了中等或高度的客观测量一致性(ICC: 0.527-0.924)。在ROC分析中,三个序列的ADCmean和前列腺影像学报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分在鉴别前列腺癌和前列腺良性疾病方面具有可比性(均p < 0.05),其中ZOOMit的曲线下面积(AUC)最高(分别为0.930和0.790)。结论:ZOOMit序列鉴别前列腺癌的AUC最高,与其他两个序列相比,可以更好地改善前列腺MRI扩散成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Prostate MR Image and Predictive Value for Benign Prostate Disease among Different DWI Sequences.

Background: Early diagnosis of prostate cancer can improve the survival rate of patients on the premise of high-quality images. The prerequisite for early diagnosis is high-quality images. ZOOMit is a method for high-resolution, zoomed FOV imaging, allowing diffusion-weighted images with high contrast and resolution in short acquisition times. RESOLVE DWI is an advanced MRI technique developed to obtain high-resolution diffusionweighted images with reduced susceptibility-related artifacts.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the image quality of conventional single-shot Echo-planar Imaging (ss-EPI), Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI), zoomed FOV imaging (ZOOMit) DWI, and readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains (RESOLVE) DWI sequences for prostate imaging, and optimize the strategy to obtain high-quality Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in order to discriminate malignant and benign prostate diseases.

Methods: Fifty-one patients were enrolled, including 31 with prostate cancer, 11 with prostate benign disease, and 9 with bladder cancer. Patients underwent MRI scans using T2-weighted (T2W), ss-EPI DWI, ZOOMit DWI, and RESOLVE DWI (b = 0, 50, 1400 s/mm2) sequences using a 3.0T MRI scanner. Subjective scores of image quality were evaluated by two independent radiologists. Differences in the subjective scores and objective parameters among the three sequences were compared. The agreement and consistency between the findings of the two raters were evaluated with Kappa or Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to distinguish malignant and benign prostate disease.

Results: The agreement of subjective scores of 51 patients was high or moderate between the two radiologists (kappa: 0.529-0.880). ZOOMit displayed the highest clarity and the lowest distortion and artifacts compared to ss-EPI and RESOLVE. The two radiologic technicians obtained moderate or high consistency of objective measurement (ICC: 0.527-0.924). In the ROC analysis, ADCmean and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores for three sequences were comparable in differentiating prostate cancer from benign prostate disease (all p>0.05), in which ZOOMit indicated the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0.930 and 0.790, respectively).

Conclusion: Compared to the other two sequences, ZOOMit can be deemed preferable to improve prostate MRI diffusion imaging as it has exhibited the highest AUC in identifying prostate cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
期刊最新文献
A Novel Fragmentation-based Approach for Accurate Segmentation of Small-Sized Brain Tumors in MRI Images. Left Basal Ganglia Stroke-induced more Alterations of Functional Connectivity: Evidence from an fMRI Study. Demographic Characteristics of Pneumoconiosis Cases: A Single Centre Experience. A Robust Approach to Early Glaucoma Identification from Retinal Fundus Images using Dirichlet-based Weighted Average Ensemble and Bayesian Optimization. Application Value of A Clinical Radiomic Nomogram for Identifying Diabetic Nephropathy and Nondiabetic Renal Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1